America's 100 Must See Exhibits

Good luck actually seeing the bears at Detroit. The enclosure is so good that the bears spend most of their time in the off-exhibit areas - you're very unlikely to actually see them. Columbus' Polar Frontier is much better in this aspect and would have my pick in AROL's place. Polar Frontier also features live Rainbow Trout that the bears love to hunt right in front of visitors - even if you saw the bears at Detroit they wouldn't be doing anything that cool.
 
Does anyone know why Detroit phased out the Arctic Fox and Snowy Owl? I know the sea otters replaced the seals but I'm curious to know why two satellite enclosures were emptied of inhabitants. Are there plans to add anything back in?
 
Does anyone know why Detroit phased out the Arctic Fox and Snowy Owl? I know the sea otters replaced the seals but I'm curious to know why two satellite enclosures were emptied of inhabitants. Are there plans to add anything back in?
The Arctic Foxes were removed for a viewing area. Just another Kagan removal I think, I'd assume the same for the owl.
 
Good luck actually seeing the bears at Detroit. The enclosure is so good that the bears spend most of their time in the off-exhibit areas - you're very unlikely to actually see them. Columbus' Polar Frontier is much better in this aspect and would have my pick in AROL's place. Polar Frontier also features live Rainbow Trout that the bears love to hunt right in front of visitors - even if you saw the bears at Detroit they wouldn't be doing anything that cool.
I would honestly put both up here. Arctic Ring of Life is better for the bears while Polar Frontier is better for the visitors.
 
Good luck actually seeing the bears at Detroit. The enclosure is so good that the bears spend most of their time in the off-exhibit areas - you're very unlikely to actually see them.
You've made this claim numerous times, and it's clearly an over-exaggeration of how hard it is to actually see the bears based on your personal experience of not seeing them. I've been to Detroit multiple times and had no issues spotting a Polar Bear, as have many other people judging by the number of photos of the animals in the ZC gallery. Are they guaranteed to be seen? No, but they're certainly not almost impossible to spot like you claim.
29. Arctic Ring of Life
Detroit Zoo, MI
Opened: 2001
Size: 4 Acres (1.6 Hectares)
Inhabitants: Polar Bear, Sea Otter


Before the turn of the 21st century, there wasn’t hardly a single polar bear enclosure in America that could be described as anything other than horribly inadequate. Thousands of pounds of discarded concrete rubble later, there arguably isn’t a single bad exhibit remaining. However, almost none of them come even close to this one, which was one of the first glimpses at what a modern polar bear habitat could look like in the US. The Arctic Ring of Life was an enormous step forward for polar bear husbandry. While not as large as many enclosures in Europe, it’s stronger from a visitor standpoint with huge underwater viewing windows and a 70 foot long walkthrough tunnel providing views of the bears and the adjacent sea otters. Both yards are still very impressive in size and represent two different environments: the grassy tundra and the Arctic sea, with simulated ice packs included. The polar bear exhibits are still just as good as they were when they were first unveiled over two decades ago, but unfortunately the complex as a whole seems to be just a bit past its prime. Supporting species including seals, arctic foxes and snowy owls were removed and even the recent addition of sea otters does not fully make up for it. As a result there’s now a huge amount of space with not many animals to be seen. The two species present are in phenomenal accommodations, but the return of additional satellite enclosures would improve this complex immensely.

full

@pachyderm pro
full

@Moebelle
full

@pachyderm pro
full

@Moebelle
full

@pachyderm pro

Similar Exhibits: Like I said, while conditions for polar bears in zoos have drastically improved following the opening of this exhibit, few come even remotely close to what Detroit has put together. The key is to build enclosures that are open without many visible barriers, which has proven to reduce stereotypic behavior. This is why one of the only exhibits that could rival the Arctic Ring of Life is the Polar Frontier at the Columbus Zoo. An extremely impressive polar bear habitat with grizzly bear and arctic fox as supporting species. The polar bear exhibit at North Carolina Zoo is also worthy of a mention, representing both a forested woodland and rocky coastline environment.

Columbus Zoo

full

@ZooNerd1234
full

@Moebelle

North Carolina Zoo

full

@Coelacanth18
full

@Moebelle
This is a solid inclusion, although the lack of satellite exhibits is disappointing.

In North America, easily the most deserving exhibit for Polar Bears is at Assiniboine Zoo in Canada, although of course, that exhibit is ineligible for this list:D.
 
Good luck actually seeing the bears in Detroit. The enclosure is so good that the bears spend most of their time in the off-exhibit areas - you're very unlikely to actually see them. Columbus' Polar Frontier is much better in this aspect and would have my pick in AROL's place. Polar Frontier also features live Rainbow Trout that the bears love to hunt right in front of visitors - even if you saw the bears at Detroit they wouldn't be doing anything that cool.
I know you've gone on the record in the past calling this exhibit overrated, but I disagree with that assessment. When I visited this past October a juvenile bear was playing with a fish toy in one of the large pools and it was great fun to observe. After she finished wrestling with the toy in the water, she ran out of the pool and began to roll around the grass while tossing the toy around. Definitely pretty cool and the most fun I've ever had watching polar bears. The ice pack enclosure was closed for pathway replacements, but I was still able to catch one of the adult bears wandering around from a distance. Even if you don't see the bears at first, I think it's pretty likely you'll see them if you through a second or third time later in the day.
Does anyone know why Detroit phased out the Arctic Fox and Snowy Owl? I know the sea otters replaced the seals but I'm curious to know why two satellite enclosures were emptied of inhabitants. Are there plans to add anything back in?
The arctic fox exhibit was removed for additional polar bear viewing which I found to be completely unnecessary. The snowy owls were in an aviary adjacent to the ice pack enclosure, but were removed a number of years ago and the space was planted over. I'm not quite sure what happened with the owls as they've been gone for quite some time.
 
Well I mean, yes, I did miss seeing Polar Bears at Detroit, but even so my claims that they are difficult to see is not based only on my experience as I've heard this sentiment from others as well, including regular visitors. It's a problem that plagues all of Detroit, really, but it's especially an issue with the Polar Bears since their exhibit takes up so much space.
 
I am glad that facilities, including Detroit, have been making polar bears the center of their own complexes in the last two-ish decades rather than just another bear. It’s a shame that Detroit’s complex is basically just the polar bears and some otters now. Columbus, Louisville, Toledo, Brookfield, etc. at least still have their complexes intact. (Even if Brookfield’s is more of Yellowstone vibe than an arctic one.) You didn’t mention the theming around the area. I get that. It’s not theme park caliber. Not on Louisville or Columbus’s level, either. But it’s a fun touch.

That’s two-thirds of Detroit’s best exhibits. Looking forward to what you have to say about the last one.
 
I'm starting to lose track of what exhibits have been covered already - could an index be added to the beginning of the thread? We're enough pages in now it's a pain to try and find them.

Alphabetised by zoo, rather than the (unnecessarily, in my view) random order used by Pachy.
  1. Gelada Reserve, Bronx Zoo
  2. Madagascar, Bronx Zoo
  3. World of Birds, Bronx Zoo
  4. Tropic World, Brookfield Zoo
  5. Heart of Africa, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium
  6. Giants of the Savanna, Dallas Zoo
  7. Arctic Ring of Life, Detroit Zoo
  8. National Amphibian Conservation Center, Detroit Zoo
  9. Kilimanjaro Safari, Disney’s Animal Kingdom
  10. Wisconsin Heritage (badgers), Henry Vilas Zoo
  11. McNair Asian Elephant Habitat, Houston Zoo
  12. South America’s Pantanal, Houston Zoo
  13. St Vincent’s Dolphin Pavilion, Indianapolis Zoo
  14. Pepper Family Wildlife Center (lion exhibit), Lincoln Park Zoo
  15. Russia’s Grizzly Coast, Minnesota Zoo
  16. Tiger Base Camp and Tiger Lair, Minnesota Zoo
  17. Kelp Forest, Monterey Bay Aquarium
  18. Expedition Peru (Andean bears), Nashville Zoo
  19. Desert Dome, Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo
  20. Seabird Aviary, Oregon Coast Aquarium
  21. Desert Lives, Phoenix Zoo
  22. Stork aviary, Racine Zoo
  23. Gharial Pond, San Diego Zoo
  24. Monkey Trails and Forest Tales, San Diego Zoo
  25. Condor Ridge, San Diego Zoo Safari Park
  26. Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium, St Louis Zoo
  27. River’s Edge, St Louis Zoo
  28. Promedica Museum of Natural History, Toledo Zoo & Aquarium
  29. Living Northwest Trail, Woodland Park Zoo
 
I'm starting to lose track of what exhibits have been covered already - could an index be added to the beginning of the thread? We're enough pages in now it's a pain to try and find them.

A mod can correct me if I'm off-base, but I believe indexes are added at the conclusion of the thread; otherwise a mod would have to update it every day.

Alphabetised by zoo, rather than the (unnecessarily, in my view) random order used by Pachy.

Alternatively, I like the random order as we get something different each time; reading about six Bronx exhibits in a row might start to feel repetitive, even if they're all interesting. But until there's an index that comes at an organizational cost, and I can see why that might be a sticking point for others.

Also thanks for the list!
 
I'm starting to lose track of what exhibits have been covered already - could an index be added to the beginning of the thread? We're enough pages in now it's a pain to try and find them.
I've put together a complete index that I will post once the list is complete. @TeaLovingDave has promised to reproduce it at the beginning of the thread so it will be easier to navigate. We're on track to reach 100 pages at the rate we're going so it'll definitely be necessary.
Alphabetised by zoo, rather than the (unnecessarily, in my view) random order used by Pachy.
I quite like the randomized order. It's less predicable and more exciting for readers to not know what exhibit may be next and like @Coelacanth18 said, it would get a little stale hearing about exhibits from the same zoo back-to-back. The index will be ordered by state and will have hyperlinks to every profile, so you'll be able to easily find the exhibit you're looking for.
 
Last edited:
Sure - you do it how you like - it’s your project. :) The only thing I think is a little lost is the conversations about what *doesn’t* make the cut.
I understand what you mean, but I think that's something that can be discussed at the end of the thread. This way when all is said and done people can bring up exhibits that they think should've or shouldn't have made the cut without interfering with dialogue about exhibits actually on the list.
 
A mod can correct me if I'm off-base, but I believe indexes are added at the conclusion of the thread; otherwise a mod would have to update it every day.

I actually *did* offer to create one at the start of this thread and update it as the thread progressed, but @pachyderm pro requested that I hold off on doing so until he posts the complete index at the conclusion of the thread :)
 
27 Monterey Kelp Aquarium is an outstanding choice (which everyone seems to agree with).

28 St Louis River's Edge is also good. I only saw Phase 1, having visited in either 1999 or 2000, but I went to see what was (at the time) the only king cheetah in the USA, so it holds a special place for that reason.
 
29. Arctic Ring of Life
Detroit Zoo, MI
Opened: 2001
Size: 4 Acres (1.6 Hectares)
Inhabitants: Polar Bear, Sea Otter


Before the turn of the 21st century, there wasn’t hardly a single polar bear enclosure in America that could be described as anything other than horribly inadequate. Thousands of pounds of discarded concrete rubble later, there arguably isn’t a single bad exhibit remaining. However, almost none of them come even close to this one, which was one of the first glimpses at what a modern polar bear habitat could look like in the US. The Arctic Ring of Life was an enormous step forward for polar bear husbandry. While not as large as many enclosures in Europe, it’s stronger from a visitor standpoint with huge underwater viewing windows and a 70 foot long walkthrough tunnel providing views of the bears and the adjacent sea otters. Both yards are still very impressive in size and represent two different environments: the grassy tundra and the Arctic sea, with simulated ice packs included. The polar bear exhibits are still just as good as they were when they were first unveiled over two decades ago, but unfortunately the complex as a whole seems to be just a bit past its prime. Supporting species including seals, arctic foxes and snowy owls were removed and even the recent addition of sea otters does not fully make up for it. As a result there’s now a huge amount of space with not many animals to be seen. The two species present are in phenomenal accommodations, but the return of additional satellite enclosures would improve this complex immensely.

full

@pachyderm pro
full

@Moebelle
full

@pachyderm pro
full

@Moebelle
full

@pachyderm pro

Similar Exhibits: Like I said, while conditions for polar bears in zoos have drastically improved following the opening of this exhibit, few come even remotely close to what Detroit has put together. The key is to build enclosures that are open without many visible barriers, which has proven to reduce stereotypic behavior. This is why one of the only exhibits that could rival the Arctic Ring of Life is the Polar Frontier at the Columbus Zoo. An extremely impressive polar bear habitat with grizzly bear and arctic fox as supporting species. The polar bear exhibit at North Carolina Zoo is also worthy of a mention, representing both a forested woodland and rocky coastline environment.

Columbus Zoo

full

@ZooNerd1234
full

@Moebelle

North Carolina Zoo

full

@Coelacanth18
full

@Moebelle

I honestly believe Columbus Zoo's Polar Frontier should get its own spot. Even though I haven't visited there personally, Polar Frontier impresses me in a way that the underwater viewing allows the best view of Polar Bears utilizing the roof to swim and play on it. Plus the grasslands of Polar Frontiers is practically the main view while Arctic Ring of Life focuses more on the snow and ice aspects of it, quite evidenced by the amount of sculpted icebergs on the underwater viewing area similiar to that of the icy areas of North Pole.

I would replace Columbus's with Pittsburgh's also quite impressive underwater tunnel viewing of the Polar Bears, not as impressive as Detroit's but still quite remarkable.
 
Last edited:
I honestly believe Columbus Zoo's Polar Frontier should get its own spot. Even though I haven't visited there personally, Polar Frontier impresses me in a way that the underwater viewing allows the best view of Polar Bears utilizing the roof to swim and play on it. Plus the grasslands of Polar Frontiers is practically the main view while Arctic Ring of Life focuses more on the snow and ice aspects of it, quite evidenced by the amount of sculpted icebergs on the underwater viewing area similiar to that of the icy areas of North Pole.

I would replace Columbus's with Pittsburgh's also quite impressive underwater tunnel viewing of the Polar Bears, not as impressive as Detroit's but still quite remarkable.
I agree with both being must-see exhibits in their own right. On my predicted list, I included both Polar Frontier and Arctic Ring of Life as exhibits I expected the inclusion of. However, there are a lot of similarities between the two exhibits, so it doesn't surprise me that the OP decided to include them in one post, with the smaller exhibit at Columbus included as a similar exhibit. I also had Glacier Run at Louisville Zoo on my list, and now I'm curious to see it it'll make the cut- as it's not as good of a Polar Bear exhibit as Columbus' (a similar exhibit), but stands out in its own right due to its theming.
 
Back
Top