America's 50 Must See Zoos

Thank you @pachyderm pro for a wonderful thread. It was a joy to read about the 50 amazing zoological establishments and I know it is a very time-consuming project to tackle a major ZooChat thread.

Including Beaver Springs Park Aquarium ;), I've visited 48 out of the 51 selected facilities. I've never been to Duke Lemur Center, Sylvan Heights Bird Park or The Wilds and all three of those are places that are a little more obscure and specific in what animals they have. Maybe one day I'll get to that trio!

I think that the list was a great one, with very few contentious choices. For sure, Central Park is tiny and not nearly a full day out in comparison to places such as Oregon or Phoenix, but it is still arguably America's "first" zoo (Philly fans might debate that point) and so including Central Park makes sense to me. I personally think that one could perhaps add Jacksonville, arguably the "best" of the big zoos to miss out on a spot. I would have swapped in Jacksonville for either Tampa or even White Oak.

It is interesting that there was no slot for a reptile zoo of any kind, although some of the big zoos (Omaha, Dallas, Fort Worth, Saint Louis, San Diego, etc.) already have massive collections of cold-blooded critters. A little-known establishment that could have sneaked into the list would be Reptile Gardens in Rapid City, South Dakota. I made a detailed species list during my 2014 visit and ended up with around 130 on-show reptiles and amphibians, with a rumored 90+ more behind the scenes. Also, that zoo's 'Sky Dome' opened in 1965 and it is arguably the very first walk-through rainforest building in an American zoo.
I forgot that Reptile Gardens existed! That would be another great pick for a reptile zoo, possibly a better pick than MToxins.
 
It is interesting that there was no slot for a reptile zoo of any kind, although some of the big zoos (Omaha, Dallas, Fort Worth, Saint Louis, San Diego, etc.) already have massive collections of cold-blooded critters. A little-known establishment that could have sneaked into the list would be Reptile Gardens in Rapid City, South Dakota. I made a detailed species list during my 2014 visit and ended up with around 130 on-show reptiles and amphibians, with a rumored 90+ more behind the scenes. Also, that zoo's 'Sky Dome' opened in 1965 and it is arguably the very first walk-through rainforest building in an American zoo.
St. Augustine Alligator Farm made the list to represent crocodilians., other good candidates in the herp space would be the new Iguanaland in Punta Gorda and The Reptarium in Utica MI. maybe Gatorland in Orlando.
 
I personally think that one could perhaps add Jacksonville, arguably the "best" of the big zoos to miss out on a spot. I would have swapped in Jacksonville for either Tampa or even White Oak.

It is interesting that there was no slot for a diverse reptile zoo of any kind, although some of the big zoos (Omaha, Dallas, Fort Worth, Saint Louis, San Diego, etc.) already have massive collections of cold-blooded critters. St. Augustine would obviously count, but it is very heavy on crocodilians. A little-known establishment that could have sneaked into the list would be Reptile Gardens in Rapid City, South Dakota. I made a detailed species list during my 2014 visit and ended up with around 130 on-show reptiles and amphibians, with a rumored 90+ more behind the scenes. Also, that zoo's 'Sky Dome' opened in 1965 and it is arguably the very first walk-through rainforest building in an American zoo.
I definitely agree with Jacksonville being on the list. By all means both Jacksonville and Tampa zoos still have facilities to keep up to date. However I remember getting out of Jax with a better impression than I did with Tampa.

Also for reptile zoos, isn’t there Clyde Peeling’s Reptiland? I heard some fine things about it.
 
Not saying that I wouldn't recommend stopping by if you've never been, but I found Reptiland to be kind of underwhelming. The collection wasn't nearly as large or diverse as I was hoping it would be (especially based on Peeling's traveling exhibits, such as the Geckos one, which has a lot of rarely exhibited species). The quality of the enclosures was also kind of... meh. Which is frankly astonishing, considering that exhibit design is what Peeling is best known for. For example, the Peeling golden frog exhibit at the Maryland Zoo is a work of art. The golden frog exhibit at Reptiland is... a small glass tank with a few small pieces of furniture.
 
I'll post more detailed thoughts anon, as I am currently working, but for now I shall say that @pachyderm pro should be proud of what he has achieved :)

Along with providing behind the scenes help with formatting, edits and updating the index post at the start of the thread, I've been working on a nice little extra to mark the end of the thread. As such, with PP's blessing here are two maps showing the geographic spread of the collections which he selected; the first, using Google Earth, is more precise but the markers are slightly harder to see (especially in the arid western regions!) and those markers in close proximity to one another are difficult or impossible to tell apart; the second is rather less precise and was done manually by myself, but where collections are in close proximity, all remain visible.

USA Top 50 Topographic.JPG

usa-map.jpg
 

Attachments

  • USA Top 50 Topographic.JPG
    USA Top 50 Topographic.JPG
    112.8 KB · Views: 121
  • usa-map.jpg
    usa-map.jpg
    188.8 KB · Views: 117
Excellent thread, Pachy - a certain Thread of the Year finalist - you might have to recuse yourself! Congratulations and thank you.

The only two selections I'd probably veer away from including are White Oak and Moody Gardens - the latter looks nice, but it's hard for me to pinpoint what's unique about it other than the pyramid structure.

Thinking about what's not represented, or represented only sparingly, the biggest thing is major bird collections. You've got two specialist collections (I know Sylvan Heights has more than just waterfowl, but it's definitely what it's known for), and a couple of general zoos with notable bird collections. But I'm tempted to give a spot to Tracy Aviary, or even perhaps San Antonio to even that up a little.

I can see the argument for Fossil Rim, but I reckon The Wilds covers that niche well enough. There's lots of places that could arguably claim this spot but I'll plump for Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium, with its stunning location.
 
I think Pachyderm pro did a good job here. Of course there are collection that everyone agree on, but there's also smaller facilities that I know nothing of, and specialist facilities that stand out on its own. Just a question, maybe Fort Wayne children zoo deserve at least an honorable mention?

Excellent thread, Pachy - a certain Thread of the Year finalist - you might have to recuse yourself! Congratulations and thank you.
I'm not sure about that even though this is a great thread. I can think of 2 thread which spark a bit more originality yet being equally good this year already, but we'll see.
 
The Alaska SeaLife Center, AK, is also noteworthy for having several rare pinnipeds and a great seabird collection in a scenic location.

I reckon that, all things considered, this is the collection I'd have swapped White Oak out for, given the species held, the fact that in many ways it represents a "type" of collection poorly-represented in the list, and the attractive and unique setting.

The Alaska Sealife Center was also heavily considered, but just doesn't have quite enough to see.

He says, having given the final slot to a collection with only 15 species :P even if it is a rather nice collection and some VERY nice species!
 
One last time, thanks again for all of the accolades everyone! It means more than you will ever know. :)

I personally think that one could perhaps add Jacksonville, arguably the "best" of the big zoos to miss out on a spot. I would have swapped in Jacksonville for either Tampa or even White Oak.
Jacksonville was a viable contender for the list, but quite frankly it looks a bit bland. A very good zoo with some standout exhibits like the South American and African Forest areas, but it lacks character and significant rarities being rather ABC focused. Perhaps in a few years when they finish that cool looking manatee tank I'd have a change of heart.

With that said, in between the start of this thread and now Tampa opened its new panther complex which looks so genuinely awful it's enough to make me question if I should have put it on this thread to begin with. Perhaps that seems overly harsh, but it's definitely one of the more interchangeable selections.

It is interesting that there was no slot for a diverse reptile zoo of any kind, although some of the big zoos (Omaha, Dallas, Fort Worth, Saint Louis, San Diego, etc.) already have massive collections of cold-blooded critters. St. Augustine would obviously count, but it is very heavy on crocodilians. A little-known establishment that could have sneaked into the list would be Reptile Gardens in Rapid City, South Dakota. I made a detailed species list during my 2014 visit and ended up with around 130 on-show reptiles and amphibians, with a rumored 90+ more behind the scenes. Also, that zoo's 'Sky Dome' opened in 1965 and it is arguably the very first walk-through rainforest building in an American zoo.
I forgot that Reptile Gardens existed! That would be another great pick for a reptile zoo, possibly a better pick than MToxins.
St. Augustine Alligator Farm made the list to represent crocodilians., other good candidates in the herp space would be the new Iguanaland in Punta Gorda and The Reptarium in Utica MI. maybe Gatorland in Orlando.
Also for reptile zoos, isn’t there Clyde Peeling’s Reptiland? I heard some fine things about it.
I never seriously considered any reptile parks minus St. Augustine. The enclosure quality at Reptile Gardens and Reptileland looks questionable to say the least and downright abysmal to say the most. The collections are definitely very large, but as @snowleopard said there are several major zoos that have collections of a similar magnitude, often in much better exhibits. I have heard good things about Iguanaland, but being so recent it has yet to really cement itself in the American zoo landscape. I will add that I do think MToxins look really intriguing and I encourage everyone to read the profile put together by @birdsandbats on his zoos of Wisconsin thread here.

I truly do not understand why white oak was included and fossil rim wasn't.
There's definitely an argument to be made here, as it's easy to compare these two facilities. As I mentioned, The Wilds and Northwest Trek both have extensive drive-through portions, and what makes White Oak a bit more unique is that you aren't driving through hundred acre pastures, rather stopping at many points to really interact with many of its residents. I recall a big critique of White Oak when I first included it was that you could see most of its species elsewhere, but it doesn't appear like any of the species on display at Fossil Rim are entirely unique either. It looks like a great place though, and in total honesty if White Oak didn't recently bring in the ringling elephants I don't think I would have put it on the list to begin with, so maybe it would have had a chance.

Thinking about what's not represented, or represented only sparingly, the biggest thing is major bird collections. You've got two specialist collections (I know Sylvan Heights has more than just waterfowl, but it's definitely what it's known for), and a couple of general zoos with notable bird collections. But I'm tempted to give a spot to Tracy Aviary, or even perhaps San Antonio to even that up a little.
The National Aviary was dismissed quickly as none of its exhibits look very innovative or even all that good to begin with. The Tracy Aviary on the other hand looks much nicer and I definitely think you could make a case for its inclusion. I do think Sylvan Heights is the overall strongest bird park that the United States has to offer, which imo made it a no brainer for this top 50.

With five Texas zoos already on the list, three already being large traditional zoos, San Antonio was always a tad lower on the totem pole than the other major collections in the state. By comparison, it's a bit scruffy with less impressive exhibitry, but the bird and herp collections are admittedly really good. I do think it has a very bright future a head of itself and the various smaller upgrades it has done have been excellent (@nczoofan uploaded some great pictures showing how much the zoo has improved with minimal resources), so maybe in a few more years it would be more likely to crack the list.

He says, having given the final slot to a collection with only 15 species :p even if it is a rather nice collection and some VERY nice species!
Yes, but the International Crane Foundation already holds every possible species that fits its core purpose. The Alaska SeaLife Center's collection still has room to grow and has yet to reach its full potential. I'm not suggesting anything crazy like belugas, but if there was an opportunity to add sea otters and the like that would be very good.

a certain Thread of the Year finalist - you might have to recuse yourself!
I see @lintworm is already sending his undercover operatives in an attempt to guarantee the win this year. Nice try! If people insist on voting for my thread, then who am I to get in their way? :p;) In all seriousness, as flattering as it is that this is a possibility, I have a gut feeling that @lintworm will likely reign victorious for a third time. A) His thread is an entirely unique idea while mine is a variation of his initial concept (and I'm already planning to do the same to his current project :p), and B) European based threats have proven to be dominant every year. Who knows though, there is still a long ways to go until we get to the competition. Let's see what everyone can do!
 
The Alaska SeaLife Center's collection still has room to grow and has yet to reach its full potential. I'm not suggesting anything crazy like belugas, but if there was an opportunity to add sea otters and the like that would be very good.

The Alaska SeaLife Centre *does* hold Sea Otter, I believe - they were the source for all of the individuals which have come to Europe in recent years.
 
The Alaska SeaLife Centre *does* hold Sea Otter, I believe - they were the source for all of the individuals which have come to Europe in recent years.
Only the occasional rescue and afaik they never go on exhibit when there are ones being rehabilitated. There is no reference to them being there on their website and no photos in the ZooChat gallery either. Where is this notion that they are sending individuals to Europe coming from?
 
There's definitely an argument to be made here, as it's easy to compare these two facilities. As I mentioned, The Wilds and Northwest Trek both have extensive drive-through portions, and what makes White Oak a bit more unique is that you aren't driving through hundred acre pastures, rather stopping at many points to really interact with many of its residents. I recall a big critique of White Oak when I first included it was that you could see most of its species elsewhere, but it doesn't appear like any of the species on display at Fossil Rim are entirely unique either. It looks like a great place though, and in total honesty if White Oak didn't recently bring in the ringling elephants I don't think I would have put it on the list to begin with, so maybe it would have had a chance.

I'm not understanding why the elephants made the difference either, as the elephants are entirely behind the scenes and not even visible if you pay for the tour. If it's the interactions, you can have those with almost all of these species elsewhere, as well.
 
I'm not understanding why the elephants made the difference either, as the elephants are entirely behind the scenes and not even visible if you pay for the tour. If it's the interactions, you can have those with almost all of these species elsewhere, as well.
The elephants are only BTS at the moment, but the center has made it clear they are intent on offering opportunities for the general public to view them once the remaining individuals arrive.
 
What makes DWA must visit is also what makes it unpleasant (to the animals, at least) From the photos/videos I saw, "They cram a lot in here" seems like an understatement. Instead of an aquarium just think of it as Daryl's menagerie or sth. Yeah of course I agree it should be on the list, I do feel like DWA leans to "bad because it's too good".
Well put, I was quite disturbed by the many tiny enclosures. Personally I feel it was a real step backwards in zoos, despite the amazing collection.
 
I want to say you did an excellent job on this thread, and honestly thank you for doing this. I can tell you put a lot of work and research into this thread. You've also opened up my eyes to facilities I didn't know a lot about or even knew existed, and I'm sure you've done the same thing to others. This list had quite a few surprises in it.

I mean, a whole zoo dedicated to only cranes? That's my favorite family of birds you know that's going on my zoo bucket list! :p
 
I just wanted to say you did an amazing job. I have been to 20 of the 50 zoos on the list and I largely agree with the list you came up with. I know Moody was a bit controversial but I’ll be there this week to see for myself. I may have a few personal favorites that I could justify for such a thread: Greensboro science center (great aquarium and zoo combination, with a focus not on ABC’s) and Rosamond Gifford (with it’s rarities and unique style given its climate). But these would have both been borderline. You did include one personal favorite though Sylvan Heights which I am glad is finally getting its due credit on this site.

Lastly I understand some people were mad about White Oaks inclusion. Personally I understand and support it, but can we maybe try to stop beating a dead horse on this. Its a great facility and while inaccessible to many does invaluable work. Fossil Rim does much the same but its collection is nothing stunning tbh, with better ungulate collections to be seen at many safari drive-thrus. This includes Natural Bridge which really is a great institution for the most part and one which has been getting closer to the AZA programs in recent years.
 
Where is this notion that they are sending individuals to Europe coming from?

The fact that the animals at Brest, Den Blå Planet Aquarium, SeaLife Birmingham and the most recent arrivals at Lisbon Oceanario all came from there, for a start :p

For instance, the following report from 2014: The Copenhagen Post - Danish News in English

I haven't been to a zoo dedicated only to cranes, but did go somewhere that only had cranes and bobcats. Unfortunately the whole place was a construction site.

ba-dum-tsss-drum.gif
 
Back
Top