while i can certainly see the potential for frustration in not having more guanacos and vicuñas in captivity/in a zoo context, the three animals are so similar to me personally (and taxonomically) that i feel like for the general zoogoer it's just... not worth the effort of managing flighty, sensitive, unpredictable, undomesticated prey animals vs their significantly more predictable, braver, tamer, more recognizable relatives. I'd imagine llamas are also a heck of a lot easier to obtain- just logistically they seem like a much more convenient option.
I would like to see zoos that hold camelids do more to try to educate about the domestic and wild variants. I don't think that is very well understood by the general public.
Given how many llamas and alpacas (at least in the UK anyway) are held by places that don't specialise in exotic species, I would like to see more zoos focus on vicuna and guanaco.
I'd prefer guanacos or vicuñas but guanacos seem uncommon in the USA and I don't think there are vicuñas here. Llamas are sort of like dromedaries or domestic Bactrian camels in that regard. A suitable stand it. This could extend to non-camelid species like domestic yak, water buffalo or reindeer (if that's a thing).Just wanted to know everyone's opinions on this. Is it okay for zoos to put llamas into mixed species exhibits with rheas, capybaras, etc. or should they stick to guanacos or vicunas instead of llamas.
I always thought that would be a neat mix. Especially since Australian dromedaries are the closest to being wild.Is there anywhere that mixes dromedaries with Australian fauna like kangaroos and emus?
Not in the same enclosure but Minnesota had Dromedary in their Australian complex for almost the entirety of that complex's existence.Is there anywhere that mixes dromedaries with Australian fauna like kangaroos and emus?
I'd prefer guanacos or vicuñas but guanacos seem uncommon in the USA and I don't think there are vicuñas here. Llamas are sort of like dromedaries or domestic Bactrian camels in that regard. A suitable stand it. This could extend to non-camelid species like domestic yak, water buffalo or reindeer (if that's a thing).
Overloon mixes dromedarys with australian fauna. Seperated by the kanagroos and people by a moat, what the waterfowl can reach themIs there anywhere that mixes dromedaries with Australian fauna like kangaroos and emus?
Are llamas alpacas the domestic counterpart to guanacos? Certainly alpacas look a bit different but llamas are pretty similar.Reindeer are a bit complicated in the domestic/wild "debate" (if you can even call it that). In North America, caribou are wild Rangifer tarandus while reindeer refers to domesticated R. tarandus. In Eurasia they're all called reindeer. All caribou are wild, while reindeer can be wild, semi-domesticated, or domesticated. A domesticated reindeer and a wild caribou are the same scientific animal but can be very very different in not just behavior, but appearance; domestic reindeer are smaller and not quite as beefy, compared to caribou who are taller and more muscular.
I see you're from North Dakota- basically for you (and I, and any other North American) reindeer already refers to the domesticated version of R. tarandus, while caribou refers to their undomesticated counterparts. I
This is of course an even more complicated question: At what point do we draw the line when counting things as "stand-ins"? Is a reindeer a stand-in for a caribou if they're technically the exact same species? I'm struggling right now to think of any other animals where this conundrum exists... wild horses, maybe?
these are questions i do not have answers to. but as a minnesotan i felt obligated to bring up the pedantic details of caribou and reindeer.
Llama are believed to be domesticated guanaco and alpaca are believe to be domesticated vicuna.Are llamas alpacas the domestic counterpart to guanacos? Certainly alpacas look a bit different but llamas are pretty similar.
I would say "no", it is not a stand-in since they are the same species. These camelids are not the same species, but domesticated versions of wild counterparts. But I am not a purist when it comes to subspecies and displays in collections, someone that is a purist would almost certainly disagree.Is a reindeer a stand-in for a caribou if they're technically the exact same species?
Detroit Zoo…did…back in the 1970s, per a documentary from that time I watched.Is there anywhere that mixes dromedaries with Australian fauna like kangaroos and emus?
Just wanted to know everyone's opinions on this. Is it okay for zoos to put llamas into mixed species exhibits with rheas, capybaras, etc. or should they stick to guanacos or vicunas instead of llamas.
I imagine reindeer aren't so common in the US because in most places with zoos the summers are generally too hot for them. Unless they have a higher tolerance for heat than I'm aware of. I've seen yaks as standalone exhibits but not water buffalo (never seen them anywhere). Bactrian camels I've only seen as standalone exhibits and I have seen llamas that way a time or two. Maybe these domestics are hard to place.I will say ...
I have never seen llama or alpaca in a zoo [except Zoo Berlin? I guess?] in the context of other South American fauna; nor have I really seen either in any other context than a children's farm section.
Interestingly with water buffalo and yaks however I have only ever seen them as standalone exhibits, as per reindeer.
Though what surprised me a bit is that reindeer aren't all too common zoo animals in USA from what I understand. Most USA zoos merely get reindeer in as seasonal displays.... and in my experience amongst major zoos not overly common either somehow but they are there and especially smaller places tend to have them.
On that note do any places keep reindeer as part of children's farm anyways? I would think breeding would be difficult as bull reindeer in rut wouldn't be sort of animal you'd want kids close to. So many places end up keeping only gelded males and/or females. Though what I don't like much about gelded males is that they don't tend to shed velvet fully....can look weird
Have you seen domestic horses as a stand in for something? On the subject of domestics, the Hogle Zoo in Salt Lake City appears to exhibit donkeys in its new Utah Wild exhibit. This is along the same lines as dromedaries in an Australian exhibit.Reindeer are a bit complicated in the domestic/wild "debate" (if you can even call it that). In North America, caribou are wild Rangifer tarandus while reindeer refers to domesticated R. tarandus. In Eurasia they're all called reindeer. All caribou are wild, while reindeer can be wild, semi-domesticated, or domesticated. A domesticated reindeer and a wild caribou are the same scientific animal but can be very very different in not just behavior, but appearance; domestic reindeer are smaller and not quite as beefy, compared to caribou who are taller and more muscular.
I see you're from North Dakota- basically for you (and I, and any other North American) reindeer already refers to the domesticated version of R. tarandus, while caribou refers to their undomesticated counterparts. I
This is of course an even more complicated question: At what point do we draw the line when counting things as "stand-ins"? Is a reindeer a stand-in for a caribou if they're technically the exact same species? I'm struggling right now to think of any other animals where this conundrum exists... wild horses, maybe?
these are questions i do not have answers to. but as a minnesotan i felt obligated to bring up the pedantic details of caribou and reindeer.