Animals That Simply Don't Interest You

Any "children's zoo" animals, any farm animals, reindeer, ostrich, ring tailed lemurs and meerkat.

Common, not endangered and unnecessary "filler".

Reminds me of some of those weird Chinese zoos that put dogs on display

I have no problem with "rare breeds" farm collections, as they serve a different purpose.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don’t really have much interest in the insects. Some are cool like the Australian Walking Stick, but I don’t spend much time looking at them.
 
Any "children's zoo" animals, any farm animals, reindeer, ostrich, ring tailed lemurs and meerkat.

Common, not endangered and unnecessary "filler".

Reminds me of some of those weird Chinese zoos that put dogs on display

I have no problem with "rare breeds" farm collections, as they serve a different purpose.

Ring-Tailed Lemurs are endangered :p Additionally, there are plenty of children's zoos that house important and endangered species, or that are used to showcase indigenous wildlife.

What are they then? Are they still under Canis lupus?

Canis dingo is the name many refer to them as now.

~Thylo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Canis dingo is the name many refer to them as now.

~Thylo

There's still debate about the taxonomic status of the dingo. Some consider it a subspecies of the wolf, others a subspecies of the dog (with dog and wolf as two seperate species) and some as only a variant or genetic clade within the larger population of dogs.

I don't think 'many' refer to it as a full species, most sources I can find either list it as a subspecies or a genetic clade. Mitochondrial genome sequences indicates that the dingo falls within the domestic dog clade
 
Ring-Tailed Lemurs are endangered :p Additionally, there are plenty of children's zoos that house important and endangered species, or that are used to showcase indigenous wildlife.



Canis dingo is the name many refer to them as now.

~Thylo
I’m kinda skeptical that they could form their own species, considering how they’ve only had a few thousand years to diverge from domestic dogs. Unless, of course, it’s been discovered that they did not evolve from domesticated dogs after all.
 
Are there any animals that you would not be excited about seeing at a zoo? I'm not talking entire orders of species, like thinking all birds or insects are boring. I'm also not talking about species that are inherently boring, like certain nocturnal animals when put in diurnal exhibits. I'm talking about single species that everyone else seems to love but when you think about them, you are unimpressed for whatever reason.

I have this odd experience with Barbary macaques. I don't think they're ugly, and I'm sure they're active (never even seen one at a zoo). I am aware that lots of research has been published about them, and that they are interesting creatures. I also would be excited to see any other species of macaque, even ones that look similar. However, for the strangest reason, Barbary macaques just....don't pique my interest. I cannot put my finger on why for the life of me.

Does anyone else experience this with any species?

I dont like bats. The henry doorly zoo and aquarium has over 1000 of them. As often and as many animal species as the omaha zoo has given away, couldn't we get rid of all those bats?
 
This is probably really unpopular to say but probably about 80% of birds I really don't have much of an interest in. I enjoy birds of prey, penguins/other sea birds, larger birds like ostriches and emus, and anything unique-looking (toucan, hoatzin, etc.), but other than that, I'll most likely skip a zoo's bird exhibit. There were many years where I didn't go into the Bird House at Lincoln Park Zoo simply because I just didn't care for them. I know a lot of people are bird fans, and that's great that you love them, but I just have really never found them interesting.
 
Back
Top