In the last days, a german animal welfare group brought up concerns (and lanced serveral press articles) that a large number of the gorillas in captivity may not be pure western lowland gorillas, but subspecies hybrids between gorilla gorilla and gorilla diehli - western lowland and cross river gorillas. These concerns are based on an anaylisis of the studbook, because a number of gorillas originate from Nigeria, where both subspecies occur. They critize that no genetic analysis of zoo gorillas has ever happened.
I was stunned to read this because I never considered the possibility that some zoo gorillas could be cross river gorillas, which are even rarer then mountain gorillas. I think they have always been much rarer then the western lowland gorillas, which makes the possibility that some came to western zoos small.
What do you think???
Well it is all well and good raising issues. It is not so good that these animal welfare groups spread rumours without ever contacting the European studbook keeper nor cooperating with them in giving "purported" evidence. Their sole purpose is of creating a media racket! No more, no less.
Besides, if they were really interested in sound western lowland gorilla breeding .... We maintain studbooks for the kind of thing they are raising. Any individual can easily trace who is the current EEP studbook coordinator for the species. So, rather than go to the media first without any corroborating evidence they should have contacted him in the first place.
Another example how animal welfare groups have no long term conservation objective whatsoever. Which is my personal form of criticism on them. Their ONLY objective is shutting down zoos completely, whereas they do not fund nor finance any sound long term in situ conservation programmes (and zoos do, though admittedly more could be done, but hey ... so could the rest of the western world).
What I do find disconcerting is that quite frequently zoos do not take this kind of attack quite seriously and sort of ignore it. The damage being done, journalists with a nose for a story will go for the sensationalist approach ... and without checking their own information just publish.
Is the free press not great. One can ofcourse litigate for defamation, but often that is in an obscure spot of the paper ... you will find some form of reparation.
If someone might have the current/latest studbook, I will gladly look into the evidence in there ... and comment in earnest.
K.B.