Me too, around 1973, she is probably the only mammal I've seen in the next 50 years that was alive then and still is!Saw Delilah at Bristol zoo,can't remember exactly what year but I think it was in the early 1970s
Me too, around 1973, she is probably the only mammal I've seen in the next 50 years that was alive then and still is!Saw Delilah at Bristol zoo,can't remember exactly what year but I think it was in the early 1970s
That's a really sobering thought, I don't know what you think but it certainly doesn't feel like 50 years to me!Me too, around 1973, she is probably the only mammal I've seen in the next 50 years that was alive then and still is!
It is terrifying!That's a really sobering thought, I don't know what you think but it certainly doesn't feel like 50 years to me!
Me too, around 1973, she is probably the only mammal I've seen in the next 50 years that was alive then and still is!
Just read a very brief bit of news from the Belfast Telegraph....concerns over animal welfare that 84 animals have died in the last 3 years...and that's it, what does this mean?
Anybody know?
You are so right, I was thinking along the same lines, a couple of fish tanks with neon tetras ,I mean the press have alot to answer for, can you imagine how the staff feelTraditionally these stories with 'scary' totals of dead animals turn out to include a lot of small animals whose lifespan might not even be as long as the arbitrary time period they've checked the number for, and someone has just seen a big number and not understood it.
Basically, a number like that without context is meaningless. If it's 84 large mammals, that might be a lot for a zoo of Belfast's size. If it's 84 stick insects in three years then that's almost certainly just animals living out their lives. Chances are that's a mix of everything and perfectly within expectations but without knowing which animals this relates to and with nothing to suggest they all died of something avoidable the number tells us nothing.