Andrew Swales
Well-Known Member
Have all these attempted mixes ended like this:
or is it just a matter of - if or when?
Fair enough, but my point is I assumed the bears still had full access to it, if they don't, I would not have voted for it as a part time bear exhibit and maybe others would not have either!It is, as it ever was on the exhibit plans, a mixed exhibit for bears and wolves.
Clearly, if the smaller area was all they had access to, then there would be more validity in this argument. But both species are still being established in a new enclosure, and it’s designed to allow staff to shift the species as required. I don’t doubt that in the long-term, the bears will spend the majority of their time in the large space. They might even be in it now - who’s to say otherwise!
Have to go with longleat on this one! A massive, natural exhibit where you can see and photograph the animals without looking though large fences. The size lets the animals be a real pack, run and play and do everything else. The animals are also clearly comfortable, as the parents had a litter soon after entering the exhibit. They were able to build 3 natural underground dens to move the pups between, with their older litter helping to care for them. There's not many places where something like that could happen.
Have all these attempted mixes ended like this:
or is it just a matter of - if or when?
This seems to be the exception rather than the rule. The Bear - Wolf mix is very common in the Netherlands/Belgium/Germany/Switzerland/France and this is the only time I have heard of it going wrong. In most enclosures the animals seemed fairly relaxed, tolerating eachothers presence. Why it went wrong in Dierenrijk, after having them together for 15 years, I do not know.
This seems to be the exception rather than the rule. The Bear - Wolf mix is very common in the Netherlands/Belgium/Germany/Switzerland/France and this is the only time I have heard of it going wrong. In most enclosures the animals seemed fairly relaxed, tolerating eachothers presence. Why it went wrong in Dierenrijk, after having them together for 15 years, I do not know.
That's right, they still doI thought Woburn mixed their bears and wolves?
Thought so!
Then, considering Woburn is an American black bear/wolf mix, would this setup be more mutually tolerant than brown bear/wolf?
I would be interested to hear opinions on whether members think the benefits outweigh the risks in mixed exhibits of this kind. In my view I'm not sure they do.
Clearly the Longleat exhibit is proving to be the strongest contender to Highland currently. Does anyone have any photos of their exhibit?
Size of the exhibit is the most critical factor, but also separation areas and the make-up of both groups. Non-breeding for both would reduce potential tensions. Individual differences could also come into play - age, neutered, hand-rearing etc. Unless the exhibit was very big then it would be risky. I haven't seen Woburn's but I would guess that would be what you're aiming for.I would be interested to hear opinions on whether members think the benefits outweigh the risks in mixed exhibits of this kind. In my view I'm not sure they do.
Results are in. Congratulations to Highland for winning the vote for Best UK Wolf enclosure. This win maintains Highlands 100% record so far with them previously having won the vote for Polar Bears and Snow Leopards. This was however their lowest proportion of a vote gained in a poll so far. The rest of the vote was split across multiple collections with there being plenty of good quality wolf enclosures in the UK. I'm assuming currently that most of the votes in the other category are for Longleat which would place them in second place on the poll and continue their good record in these threads. @speedycheese @Tea_and_Biology @carl the birder @zoosafari123 @Elephantelephant did you all want to vote for Longleat?
Highland: 51.2%
Longleat/Other: 18.6%
Wildwood: 11.6%
Cotswold: 7.0%
Woburn: 7.0%
Wild Place: 4.7%
Hard to understand how Wildwood scored third place. I suspect that some people vote having never seen some of the exhibits and base it on photos. WW's exhibit looks okay when the trees are in full leaf in summer, but it is an absolute mudhole when it gets wet. Viewing is rather poor too. Size wise not too bad (depending on how many animals are in it). Not their best exhibit.Results are in. Congratulations to Highland for winning the vote for Best UK Wolf enclosure. This win maintains Highlands 100% record so far with them previously having won the vote for Polar Bears and Snow Leopards. This was however their lowest proportion of a vote gained in a poll so far. The rest of the vote was split across multiple collections with there being plenty of good quality wolf enclosures in the UK. I'm assuming currently that most of the votes in the other category are for Longleat which would place them in second place on the poll and continue their good record in these threads. @speedycheese @Tea_and_Biology @carl the birder @zoosafari123 @Elephantelephant did you all want to vote for Longleat?
Highland: 51.2%
Longleat/Other: 18.6%
Wildwood: 11.6%
Cotswold: 7.0%
Woburn: 7.0%
Wild Place: 4.7%
I voted for Wildwood having seen all of those outside Scotland, so not basing it on photos.Hard to understand how Wildwood scored third place. I suspect that some people vote having never seen some of the exhibits and base it on photos. WW's exhibit looks okay when the trees are in full leaf in summer, but it is an absolute mudhole when it gets wet. Viewing is rather poor too. Size wise not too bad (depending on how many animals are in it). Not their best exhibit.
I haven't seen many of the exhibits, hence not voting. Not surprised that Highland won. I would have said that Cotswold's was better than WW easily. Wild Place looks interesting, with or without bear interaction.