Best Zoo Exhibit in U.S.

Anyhuis: At least you accomplished something with your last post to BlackRhino, you got him to want to visit Henry Doorly in the future!:D Even while mentioning something you think is overrated.:D
 
Ok, well I won't start a new thread but here is my 26 to 50 ranks in the list!:

26. Tropical Rain Forest, Woodland Park Zoo
27. Canadian Wilds, Calgary Zoo
28. African Savanna, Honolulu Zoo
29. Great Northwest, Oregon Zoo
30. African Forest, Columbus Zoo
31. Ituri Forest, San Diego Zoo
32. Monkey Trails and Forest Tails, San Diego Zoo
33. African Savanna, Woodland Park Zoo
34. Northern Trail, Woodland Park Zoo
35. Destination Africa, Calgary Zoo
36. Big Cat Falls, Philadelphia Zoo
37. Africa, Oregon Zoo
38. Jungala, Busch Gardens Tampa
39. Mundo Maya, Dallas World Aquarium - this is more a zoo than an aquarium
40. Florida, Lowry Park Zoo
41. Mountain Woodland, Arizona Sonora Desert Museum - this is the exhibit that is the fuzziest in my memory, saw it in 1992 or so
42. Asian Gardens, Lowry Park Zoo
43. Tropical Discovery, Denver Zoo
44. Orinoco Rainforest, Dallas World Aquarium - this is more a zoo than an aquarium
45. Asian Forest Sanctuary, Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium
46. Asian Falls, Fort Worth Zoo
47. African Kopje, San Diego Zoo - the exhibit that first interested me in the subject of zoo design!
48. Carnivore Kingdom, Philadelphia Zoo
49. Primate World, Lowry Park Zoo
50. African Savanna, San Francisco Zoo - wow, my local zoo made the list!

Interesting to see the exhibits from Lowry Park on there. I disagree on those exhibits, but it is your list, and if I were to come up with a list of 50 exhibits there would be plenty exhibits that everyone would disagree with. Does Tropical Rain Forest include Jaguar Cove?
 
Allen, I personally just don't like Mayan temples. Just my opinion.

My point is that you listed it as if it was an "obvious Plus" to not have the Mayan temple, when in fact, it's only a plus for you -- and a few others.

On the underwater viewing part...and it is better than not having it at all. I think its better for a zoo to have it then not, for those few times an animal decides to use its pool it makes for an incredible experience. I think it depends on luck

I just don't think something that "depends on luck" or is basically "hit or miss" should be MUCH of a factor in determining what is an incredible exhibit. For example, have you heard of the National Zoo's O-Line? For about 15 minutes a day, you can see orangutans swinging on a line directly above you, as they transport themselves from one side of the Zoo to the other. Honestly, I've never seen this great thing, but I've seen many pictures of it. If this experience were available to visitors for most of the day in Washington, I would consider the O-Line for my Top Exhibits list. But since it's 100% dependent on being at the Zoo at a specific time once per day, I can't rate it so highly. Quite honestly, the chances of seeing an elephant, tiger, or jaguar in the water are even more remote. Thus, while I agree it's better to have underwater viewing than not have it, this still isn't a major factor in highly rating an exhibit. It's a minor factor, but not a major one.
 
I agree that it shouldn't be a big factor for animals like that, but I would certainly consider it simply because it creates the potential for truly special zoo experiences, even though rare.
 
My point is that you listed it as if it was an "obvious Plus" to not have the Mayan temple, when in fact, it's only a plus for you -- and a few others.



I just don't think something that "depends on luck" or is basically "hit or miss" should be MUCH of a factor in determining what is an incredible exhibit. For example, have you heard of the National Zoo's O-Line? For about 15 minutes a day, you can see orangutans swinging on a line directly above you, as they transport themselves from one side of the Zoo to the other. Honestly, I've never seen this great thing, but I've seen many pictures of it. If this experience were available to visitors for most of the day in Washington, I would consider the O-Line for my Top Exhibits list. But since it's 100% dependent on being at the Zoo at a specific time once per day, I can't rate it so highly. Quite honestly, the chances of seeing an elephant, tiger, or jaguar in the water are even more remote. Thus, while I agree it's better to have underwater viewing than not have it, this still isn't a major factor in highly rating an exhibit. It's a minor factor, but not a major one.


But (and not trying to make you look bad), doesn't it make it that much more thrilling to see an animal (that doesn't usually go for a swim) swimming in their pool? I think it does. And for elephants, every elephant keeper I have asked has told me their elephants use their pools everyday. At least once a day. I will admit I have not seen it too often either, but the times I have it is a very cool experience.
 
Yes, I have included Jaguar Cove in Woodland Parks Tropical Rain Forest, since it nearly seamlessly connects to the older part of the exhibit...there are even vines that drape between one of the jaguar viewing areas and the indoor forest building.

On Lowry Park, its interesting that their newer Africa exhibit area ranks lower than the ones on my list. Something about it seemed disjointed.

Zoos I have visited that have no exhibit complexes on my list:
Miami Metrozoo
Los Angeles Zoo
Tierpark Hellabrun - I don't remember any specific exhibits here in 1995
Schonnbrunn Tiergarten - ibid
Biodome Montreal
Phoenix Zoo - was there in 1985
Oakland Zoo
Wildlife World Sydney - nice place but hard to break it up into exhibit areas
Lion Country Safari Irvine - closed
St. Augustine Alligator Farm
Hartleys Crocodile Adventures Cairns
Santa Barbara Zoo
Santa Ana Zoo
Charles Paddock Zoo
 
Count me as one who has yet to see Jaguar Cove. But even before it was opened, I think I could identify the problem with this "exhibit" -- it's very disjointed. You're never really sure whether or not you are still in the "Tropical Rain Forest" exhibit.

This of course can be a problem with ranking many multi-enclosure exhibits. For example, here at the Indianapolis Zoo, technically the "Oceans complex" includes the excellent Oceans building, outdoor polar bear exhibit, outside walrus habitat, and the amazing Dolphin Dome and show. If we can really consider these all together as "one exhibit", I think Indianapolis' Oceans complex has to be a Top 10 exhibit in the nation. But Jon and I didn't combine all of these, especially since it's quite a walk from the Oceans building to the Dolphins building. A somewhat similar thing is Kansas City's Africa exhibit. While the area is huge and has many different sections, I couldn't argue with anyone who wanted to consider this different exhibits. But IF you do consider this entire package as one exhibit (as I do, because of the strong continuous theme), then this HAS TO be considered a Top 10 (or Top 5) exhibit!



Let me answer a couple of specifics in your description:
(1) You repeatedly name its "absence of mayan temple" as if this is a "plus". It certainly is to you, but NOT necessarily for everyone else. To be, it's a "minus". I actually LIKE the Mayan temple in Jacksonville's jaguar exhibit slightly better.
(2) I've repeatedly pointed out that "underwater viewing" can be very, very overrated. When it comes to animals that are almost in the water -- hippos, polar bears, sea lions, otters, beavers, etc -- then underwater viewing is amazing! But for animals that are rarely (or only occasionally) in the water -- jaguars, tigers, elephants -- it's not a big deal. I've been to my local Indianapolis Zoo hundreds of times, and in those visits I've seen the elephants in the water maybe 3 times. I've seen the tigers in the water exactly once (I was with SnowLeopard at the time!). So thus Jaguar Cove's "underwater viewing" is really not that big a deal, same with the Bronx Zoo's Tiger Mountain. Even Omaha is very excited that in a few years they'll be opening (what they say is) the world's first elephant exhibit with underwater viewing. Sorry Omaha -- OVERRATED!

A couple of comments:

Once Jaguar Cove was added to the Tropical Rain Forest complex, it really "pulls together" what were disjointed elements into a single experience: starting with Jaguars, moving through the indoor exhibits, back outside to the primate islands (one now apparently only housing duikers), then to the colobus mesh exhibit, and finally to the two gorilla exhibits and back out at the original entry point.

Leipzig zoo has the world's first underwater elephant view--and it is spectacular for 10 seconds after the elephant submerges, then becomes so cloudy you can't see a thing--but very fun while it lasts. The former director of Omaha was so impressed he added it to the "wish list" for future improvements at Omaha.
 
Regarding the pachyderm underwater peep show, I personally do not like to see elephants swimming withour their trunks.
 
Yes, I have included Jaguar Cove in Woodland Parks Tropical Rain Forest, since it nearly seamlessly connects to the older part of the exhibit...there are even vines that drape between one of the jaguar viewing areas and the indoor forest building.

On Lowry Park, its interesting that their newer Africa exhibit area ranks lower than the ones on my list. Something about it seemed disjointed.

Zoos I have visited that have no exhibit complexes on my list:
Miami Metrozoo
Los Angeles Zoo
Tierpark Hellabrun - I don't remember any specific exhibits here in 1995
Schonnbrunn Tiergarten - ibid
Biodome Montreal
Phoenix Zoo - was there in 1985
Oakland Zoo
Wildlife World Sydney - nice place but hard to break it up into exhibit areas
Lion Country Safari Irvine - closed
St. Augustine Alligator Farm
Hartleys Crocodile Adventures Cairns
Santa Barbara Zoo
Santa Ana Zoo
Charles Paddock Zoo

Thanks.

I've only been to Miami, LA, Phoenix, and Santa Ana out of that list and I think I would agree that none had anything great in terms of what you're rating at least. Although I don't have the best memory of everything at Phoenix, and it was quite good for the most part, and Amazon and Beyond wasn't open yet when I was at Miami.
 
Geormorph, regarding Columbus, why the islands of southeast asia? I wasn't really impressed by it, not saying it was bad, but nothing special imo. And why their African Forest? Thought it was good, but again, nothing special, and not as good as their North American section, or Asia Trail for that matter.
 
Are there any great themed multi species exhibit complexes in Pittsburg?

The Africa savanna section is pretty good, but doubt it'd make a list like this.

The Water's edge which features polar bears, sea otters, and eventually walruses is good, and could make the list, especially once they get the walruses.
 
Unfortunatley Asia Trail wasn't open when I was there and I didnt see North America...I probably remember Islands as impressive because of the theming!
 
The Africa savanna section is pretty good, but doubt it'd make a list like this.

The Water's edge which features polar bears, sea otters, and eventually walruses is good, and could make the list, especially once they get the walruses.

I'd rate the Pittsburgh African exhibits well above the very disappointing Water's Edge (see Snowleopard's review).

Missing from these lists are the Desert Grasslands and Upland Desert Trail at ASDM (peccary, lizard, coyote, "Life on the Rocks,"), Minnesota Zoo's Minnesota Trail and Russia's Grizzly Coast (from all reports), Cleveland's Wolf Woods, and Binder Park's Africa.
 
I'd rate the Pittsburgh African exhibits well above the very disappointing Water's Edge (see Snowleopard's review).

Missing from these lists are the Desert Grasslands and Upland Desert Trail at ASDM (peccary, lizard, coyote, "Life on the Rocks,"), Minnesota Zoo's Minnesota Trail and Russia's Grizzly Coast (from all reports), Cleveland's Wolf Woods, and Binder Park's Africa.

Water's Edge certainly has too much fake rock, which is why I'd put Maryland Zoo's polar bear exhibit above it, but I'd still take that exhibit over the Islands at Columbus, and can see some putting it in a top 50 list, especially when they haven't been to most of the zoos in the country.

And I'm certainly not saying either of the aforementioned Pitt exhibits are great, the aquarium is probably the best quality part of that zoo, but geomorph won't consider that.
 
I'd rate the Pittsburgh African exhibits well above the very disappointing Water's Edge (see Snowleopard's review).

Missing from these lists are the Desert Grasslands and Upland Desert Trail at ASDM (peccary, lizard, coyote, "Life on the Rocks,"), Minnesota Zoo's Minnesota Trail and Russia's Grizzly Coast (from all reports), Cleveland's Wolf Woods, and Binder Park's Africa.

Another great exhibit that is missing is St. Louis' River's Edge and Bronx's Himalayan Highlands.

Pittsburgh's African Savanna is extremely ordinary, and if it were to make a top list that would be a good indication that America is lacking good exhibits. But it's not, so Pittsburgh's African Savanna shouldn't be on anyone's top 50 list unless they have some sort of connection with Pittsburgh Zoo.
 
@ANyhuis: ZooChatter "reduakari" is correct about the Tropical Rainforest area at the Woodland Park Zoo. With Jaguar Cove in 2003 a brand-new entrance was constructed, and there is an enormous, fake, kapok tree that serves as the official gateway to the tropical zone. The jaguar exhibit is brilliant, the indoor area with ocelots, toucans, golden lion tamarins, anacondas, walk-through aviary, reptiles and birds, etc, is all very well done but nothing spectacular; the outdoor island habitats for red ruffed lemurs and red flanked duikers are also brilliant, the colobus monkey exhibit is very good with 5 of the active primates; the 2 gorilla enclsoures still hold up extremely well 30 years later. The area has a loop that leads back to within a few feet of the Jaguar Cove entrance, and so every time I visit the zoo I look for the jaguar twice. The last time you visited I admit that perhaps the tropical area was a little disjointed, but the 2003 entrance ties it all together. Also, the African Savanna area of the zoo has a new entrance since you last visited. In 2001 an African Village was constructed as the gateway to the 30 year-old area, and in 2002 an African wild dog exhibit was added. So both the African and Tropical sections of the zoo are now much more clearly defined, and it is time for another visit from you!:)

@geomorph: It never ceases to amaze me how great zoos can not have any exhibits worthy of a top 50 list. I love the Miami Metrozoo (all moats and no bars) and yet there is nothing there that would make my own list of top exhibits. I've seen "Amazon and Beyond" and think that it needs years of growth to become a great set of enclosures, and "Wings of Asia" is borderline brilliant but I'm not a huge bird fan.

I'd rank the Columbus Zoo in my top 5 zoos, but everything there is quite good but lacks true world-class status. Probably nothing would make my top exhibits list, even though I have no problem classifying it in my top 5 zoos.
 
@geomorph: It never ceases to amaze me how great zoos can not have any exhibits worthy of a top 50 list. I love the Miami Metrozoo (all moats and no bars) and yet there is nothing there that would make my own list of top exhibits. I've seen "Amazon and Beyond" and think that it needs years of growth to become a great set of enclosures, and "Wings of Asia" is borderline brilliant but I'm not a huge bird fan.

I'd rank the Columbus Zoo in my top 5 zoos, but everything there is quite good but lacks true world-class status. Probably nothing would make my top exhibits list, even though I have no problem classifying it in my top 5 zoos.

Miami Metrozoo is certainly miles better than the Lowry Park Zoo which is very small and lacks a decent exhibit.

Amazon & Beyond has grown a lot since your visit and the daily rain showers in Miami help to make all the enclosures more lush and filled with greenery. I personally really love that section, and the giant otter habitat is brilliant. Amazon & Beyond is the type of exhibit though that reduakri would not like as sewers and fences are in plain view of guests in many of the exhibits. The holding buildings are starting to become less evident with the foliage growing in. I like it better than Wings of Asia, as I am not a bird fan at all.
 
Back
Top