That used to be the case, but since then the two tigers have moved to a sanctuary. Their exhibit is being enlarged and when the renovations are complete it will hold Sumatran tigers.Doesn't Nashville have something similar?
That used to be the case, but since then the two tigers have moved to a sanctuary. Their exhibit is being enlarged and when the renovations are complete it will hold Sumatran tigers.Doesn't Nashville have something similar?
It's too bad India doesn't seem willing to export any Bengal tigers. It would be neat to have both color phases in zoos outside of India.If White tigers in captivity were still a morph of pure Indian tiger,as was originally the case, it would be more acceptable to keep/breed the two colours alongside each other. The problem is that pure Indians have disappeared in zoos outside of India, with all White tigers now being impure/generic.
I know this has been discussed in depth but I have to admit that I do like seeing white tigers. They are beautiful animals. However, I do agree that priority should be given to the orange ones. This isn't to say that they don't have educational value. Maybe if a zoo had some space I could see keeping one (especially if it's a rescued one) to educate the public about that color variation. Doesn't Nashville have something similar?
I think you may be confusing the subspecies.I believe there was a bulk DNA testing of Tigers held in European zoos done some years ago with the results showing the bulk of so called Indian Tigers were in fact just that Indian Tigers!
This is interesting in context of this discussion - not a wild white tiger, but certainly one whiter than normal, in Kaziranga. Just posted today.
Dr Rajesh Gopal on Twitter