Marwell Wildlife Bring back....?

Kwame said:
According to the inventory on the Marwell website at the start of 2009 Marwell had 2 male and 3 female Western Black and white Colobus monkeys.

During 2009 they had a birth but this unfortunately died.

Also during 2009 two of the females died leaving the 2 males and 1 remaining female as of 31 December 2009.

Thankyou for the update. The two females must have died in the last three months of 2009 then. As HuxleyPig confirms there are now only 2(males?) perhaps the third female has also died even more recently ?

This group appeared to be doing quite well but sadly not now. Western Colobus do seem rather fragile in captivity- they seem to 'blossom' for some years with breeding and then start to die off again. Paignton's group is currently in a similar situation. I wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the Marwell group?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I would most like to see the return of jaguars to the collection. The black male was beautiful.

Does anyone know why they chose to stop holding this species and where the animals went to?
 
The jags all went to Chester's Spirit of the Jaguar exhibit.

The decision to send away the jaguars wasn't an easy one, but there were a number of factors which were mostly financial, they couldn't afford to get a new exhibit in time for one that was quickly becoming unsuitable as it aged, and I believe Jaguar Cars who sponsored Marwell's jaguars pulled out, leaving little finance left.
 
I think, African hunting dogs would be a superb addition next to the African valley.
 
I would like to see the return of Asian Lions or Caracal Lynx or even European Bison
 
There are certainly plenty of species to choose from. During its lifetime Marwell has probably exhibited a far greater turnover of species than any other ZooPark of equivalent size and age in the UK. I'm not really sure why that should be although the shift of policy to keeping more African Antelope would certainly have been responsible for some of the changes. But many others aren't related to that.
 
one of the key things with Marwell (certinly in the Early days) was that they would aquire a rare species (for example wisent) that is also rare in zoos, they would exhibit them until they had segnificent (soz cant spell) breeding results and for them to 'stock up' in Zoos then they would move them on and 'replace' them with another rare species. for example the Wisent were replaced by Sitatunga which still recide in the same encloure to this day
 
Last edited:
It would be the Jaguars and the Black Rhinos for me (I know Marwell has its White Rhinos, but still...).
As for the domestic animals...I do commend Marwell for the brave decision to phase out its domestic animals though. There was a time when I thought it was OK for zoos to have a little children's farm or pets' corner filled with rabbits and guinea-pigs and goats, but I've done a complete U-turn now. To have domestic animals in a zoo only fosters the idea, still prevalent in many people's minds, that the zoo is there only as a form of children's entertainment. Zoos need to be taken more seriously than this. There is already a legion of city farms/farm parks/petting farms around the country where children can meet, stroke and even occasionally handle domestic animals. Let them keep goats, ponies, and all the rest, and let zoos concentrate on non-domestic animals.
 
Whilst it is true that Marwell does appear to have had a fairly hefty turnover of species over the years, the turnover is probably no greater than most zoos. It must be remembered that Marwell Zoo, as I still prefer to call it, opened in 1972, and thus all the animal comings and goings are spread over a timescale of nearly forty years. There are presently 20 species at the zoo which were founder members of the collection back in 1972 (although in a few cases the zoo went out of a species only to acquire a fresh group some years later). Those species in the collection now that were also present in 1972 are: (list correct as to January 2010)

Bennett's Wallaby
Cheetah
Amur Tiger
Chapman's Zebra
Grevy's Zebra
Hartmann's Mountain Zebra
Przewalski's Wild Horse
Brazilian Tapir (zoo went out of this species in 1997, but species reacquired in 2009)
Giraffe
Nyala
Common Waterbuck
Scimitar-horned Oryx
Black Wildebeest (White-tailed Gnu) (zoo went out of species in 1979, reacquired 2009)
Ostrich
Greater Rhea
Emu (zoo went out of species in 1984, reacquired 2006)
Greater Flamingo (zoo went out of species in 2003, reacquired 2006)
Greylag Goose
Demoiselle Crane (zoo went out of species in 1984, reacquired 2001)
Sarus Crane
 
zooman64 said:
It would be the Jaguars and the Black Rhinos for me (I know Marwell has its White Rhinos, but still...).
As for the domestic animals...I do commend Marwell for the brave decision to phase out its domestic animals though. There was a time when I thought it was OK for zoos to have a little children's farm or pets' corner filled with rabbits and guinea-pigs and goats, but I've done a complete U-turn now. To have domestic animals in a zoo only fosters the idea, still prevalent in many people's minds, that the zoo is there only as a form of children's entertainment. Zoos need to be taken more seriously than this. There is already a legion of city farms/farm parks/petting farms around the country where children can meet, stroke and even occasionally handle domestic animals. Let them keep goats, ponies, and all the rest, and let zoos concentrate on non-domestic animals.
Click to expand...

I dont want to sidetrack this thread but I couldnt help but see this and completley disagree. I see the point of zoos, in addition to the captive breeding of endangered species, is to harbour a sense of excitement, to inspire and entrance all generations (particularly the young), thus leading to a repsect for wildlife and feeling of responsibility. Domestic animals allow this in their physical intimacy, entertaining and inspiring children, ultimatley leaving them with happy memories. Zoos are a form of entertainment and so long this is in conjunction with species conservation then there is nothing wrong in that.

Rant over back to Marwell
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top