Gorilla House was still closed today, so hopefully no serious problems.
Today was my first visit to Bristol Zoo in more than four years. Unfortunately I found my visit a little concerning. The northern boundary remains excellent, with the obvious exception of the lion enclosure (much bigger than I remember, I am convinced the footprint and existing infrastructure make snow leopards a good choice to replace the current inhabitants). The Twilight House, Reptile House, Aquarium and Insect House are the backbone of the zoo.
I have always considered Penguin and Seal Coast to be excellent; I am unsure if that is indeed the case. It was partially closed to allow for work to be done in the aviary. I found the underwater viewing to be a bit grubby; perhaps this lower area needs redecorating. The fur seal pool is only going to look smaller every year, and whilst the aviary is very good the penguin/tern mix seems to becoming more and more common. This exhibit, on this visit at least, no longer 'anchored' the southern side of the zoo.
There isn't much to say about the Tree Kangaroo Aviary, which hadn't opened on my previous visit. Hopefully the history of the exhibit are known to readers; in its current form it is a borderline failure, as the aviary is unused and the tree kangaroo exhibits look rushed and out of place. Nice views of an unusual animal, but that's about all I can say.
When I read the plans mentioned several posts prior, I was quite concerned. It reads as if they plan to develop Wild Place into a major zoo and the Clifton site in sort of the opposite direction. After today's visit I am almost inclined to say this would be a good thing. If Wild Place does become what we probably all want it to then Bristol ZG will need to distinguish itself. Only a sheer madman would interfere with the good parts of the zoo: the aforementioned northern avenue as well as the primate islands. Almost everything else, I would argue, could be considered up for grabs in terms of reworking the site for the future.