British Isles Cup Redux - League B - Bristol/Wildplace vs Marwell

Bristol et al vs Marwell - TROPICAL FORESTS

  • Marwell 2/1 Bristol

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Marwell 3/0 Bristol

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .

TeaLovingDave

Moderator
Staff member
15+ year member
Another fairly broad topic, with various possible lines of discussion along which decisions and votes can be made - TROPICAL FORESTS.

So, which collection fares better in your opinion?
 
I'm not going to vote for now, I will wait to see what points others bring up.

Though I do sense that Bristol may be well in the lead here...
 
Six votes in the other match already but none in this one? :P I do hope people have realised I posted two threads!
 
Here are some species lists if it helps (though I doubt it will given they both have exactly 24 rainforest mammals...:p)

Bristol:

Okapi
Red-river hog
Red-bellied lemur
Black-and-white ruffed lemur
Agile gibbon
Aye-aye
Azara's agouti
Black and Gold Howler monkey
Blue eyed black lemur
Colombian spider monkey
Common squirrel monkey
Comoros flying fox
Golden lion tamarin
Golden-headed lion tamarin
Goodfellow's tree kangaroo
Java mouse deer
Linnaeus's two-toed sloth
Lion tailed macaque
Negros warty pig
New Guinea ground cuscus
Pygmy slow loris
Six-banded armadillo
Western lowland gorilla
Western pygmy hippopotamus

Marwell

Asian small-clawed otter
Binturong
Black-and-white ruffed lemur
Capybara
Collared peccary
Common squirrel monkey
Cottontop tamarin
Dark cusimanse
Eastern bongo
Golden lion tamarin
Golden headed lion tamarin
Java mouse deer
Linnaeus's two-toed sloth
Lowland anoa
Northern narrow-striped boky
Okapi
Pygmy marmoset
Red ruffed lemur
Siamang
Silvery marmoset
South American tapir
Western pygmy hippopotamus
Western sitatuga
White-faced saki

Potentially interesting to note that over half of the Bristol list is made up of primates!
Will try and post some enclosure pics later but might never get round to it... :)
 
Bristol also has the forest of birds, the first part of Bug Wold, tropical fish tanks in the aquarium, butterfly house and some reptiles.
Marwell has its new tropical house but i haven't seen it yet.
 
I haven't been to either for a while, but I remember Marwell having a tropical house that was certainly respectable but nothing overly spectacular. Bristol, meanwhile, had a really nice bird and butterfly house, and then there was Bug World, one of the best insect houses I've ever seen (and I really REALLY don't like insect houses, namely because I don't like tarantulas) and it started with a nice little tropical section which I thought was really nice.

Also, never been to Wild Place.
 
@pipaluk - as someone who - in recent years - has been even more critical of the direction Marwell has taken than I have of Edinburgh, I think it would be informative for the purposes of the current discussion to hear from you why you have voted 2-1 for Bristol; in other words, what are the aspects which mean that Marwell - despite its decline - is still worthy of earning a point :)
 
@pipaluk - as someone who - in recent years - has been even more critical of the direction Marwell has taken than I have of Edinburgh, I think it would be informative for the purposes of the current discussion to hear from you why you have voted 2-1 for Bristol; in other words, what are the aspects which mean that Marwell - despite its decline - is still worthy of earning a point :)
I'm not really sure Marwell does necessarily deserve a point but Bristol is the winner here so I voted 2-1 and waited for someone to persuade me why it should be 3-0.
On mammals it had already been said it was a tie number wise, though I think Bristol's list is slightly more impressive - Aye Aye, tree kangaroo, agile gibbon, gorilla of those that aren't duplicated spring to mind.
I don't think this category is probably Marwell's weakest against Bristol : primates, birds, misc mammals, ectotherms, it would be an easy 3-0 Bristol but although Bristol is better in this one, I need convincing Marwell's collection is 3-0 inferior. Maybe 2 1/2 to 1/2 is more accurate
 
Here are some species lists if it helps (though I doubt it will given they both have exactly 24 rainforest mammals...:p)

Bristol:

Okapi
Red-river hog
Red-bellied lemur
Black-and-white ruffed lemur
Agile gibbon
Aye-aye
Azara's agouti
Black and Gold Howler monkey
Blue eyed black lemur
Colombian spider monkey
Common squirrel monkey
Comoros flying fox
Golden lion tamarin
Golden-headed lion tamarin
Goodfellow's tree kangaroo
Java mouse deer
Linnaeus's two-toed sloth
Lion tailed macaque
Negros warty pig
New Guinea ground cuscus
Pygmy slow loris
Six-banded armadillo
Western lowland gorilla
Western pygmy hippopotamus

Marwell

Asian small-clawed otter
Binturong
Black-and-white ruffed lemur
Capybara
Collared peccary
Common squirrel monkey
Cottontop tamarin
Dark cusimanse
Eastern bongo
Golden lion tamarin
Golden headed lion tamarin
Java mouse deer
Linnaeus's two-toed sloth
Lowland anoa
Northern narrow-striped boky
Okapi
Pygmy marmoset
Red ruffed lemur
Siamang
Silvery marmoset
South American tapir
Western pygmy hippopotamus
Western sitatuga
White-faced saki

Potentially interesting to note that over half of the Bristol list is made up of primates!
Will try and post some enclosure pics later but might never get round to it... :)
Here are some pics of the enclosures from animals mentioned in this list:

Bristol:

full

Black and Gold Howler Monkey outdoor enclosure.

full

Black and Gold Howler Monkey indoor enclosure.

full

Brown Spider Monkey indoor enclosure.

full

Linnaeus's Two-toed Sloth and Six-banded Armadillo enclosure.

full

Lion-tailed Macaque indoor enclosure

full

Lion-tailed Macaque Outdoor enclosure.

full

Negros Warty Pig enclosure

full

Agile Gibbon indoor enclosure

full

Agile Gibbon island

full

Gorilla Indoor enclosure.

full

Aye-aye and Malagasy Jumping Rat enclosure

full

New Guinea Ground Cuscus enclosure. (Also shared with Brush-tailed Bettong)

full

Goodfellow's Tree Kangaroo enclosure. Photo from 2018.

All of these photos were taken by @MagpieGoose except for the Goodfellow's Tree Kangaroo enclosure picture, that was taken by @zoogiraffe . More pics from Bristol and Wildplace, Marwell coming in next posts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TNT
I would have probably voted Bristol in this cup due to the mammalian species from the tropics kept being representative of just a bit more in terms of biogeographic regions.

Not sure about Marwell but they may have the edge over Bristol with birds or herps.
 
Yes, London just didn't impress me, quite a nice range of species and many of top conservation concern but it did have a sort of fading glory type feel to it (ZSL in general).

Well, I suspect I'd have chewed someone's arm off to see it as it was even two decades ago (assuming that is when you last saw it) :P
 
London :) as I assumed you'd have last seen them around the same time.

Well I was in London last year and did pay a couple of visits to ZSL but I did first visit the zoo way back when I first visited Bristol which would have been in the early 2000's.

I honestly can't remember anything about the reptile house except that they had some crocodiles that I believe were New Guinean instead of the Phillipine crocodiles they now have (not 100 % sure about that though and they may have been the same that are currently kept).

Strangely enough I really can't remember anything else about London zoo except that there were chimpanzees still kept in those strange looking barred enclosures (that appear to have now left the collection), some diana and Hanuman langur monkeys (that were still there last year) and the Clore pavilion had more species like armadillo (and I think wombats maybe ?) and looked very different from the current building.

Overall I have much stronger memories of Bristol and its collection and being impressed by the zoo in general. I think if I was to pay a visit now I would still prefer Bristol to London.
 
Last edited:
some diana and hanuman langur monkeys (that were still there last year)

Actually the langurs present now are a relatively new arrival, coming to the zoo when Land of the Lions opened, and are genus-level hybrids as is the case for almost all "Hanuman" Langur in Europe. The ones present in the early to mid 2000s were purebred Sri Lanka Grey Langur (Semnopithecus priam) and were actively phased out by the collection by the end of that decade if memory serves me correctly.
 
Actually the langurs present now are a relatively new arrival, coming to the zoo when Land of the Lions opened, and are genus-level hybrids as is the case for almost all "Hanuman" Langur in Europe. The ones present in the early to mid 2000s were purebred Sri Lanka Grey Langur (Semnopithecus priam) and were actively phased out by the collection by the end of that decade if memory serves me correctly.

It sounds like ZSL through and through to phase out a purebred species and bring in a breeding group of some hybrids, LOL, well can't say I'm suprised at all.
 
Back
Top