In Africa a good deal of the countries don't even have zoos. Guyana and several countries and territories in the Caribbean have nothing.
oh sorry I thought that zoo was in French Guiana. Does French Guiana have a zoo?Guyana *has got* a zoo actually : The Guyana National Zoo.![]()
I think this thread might be losing the plot. Cities with zoos, aquaria etc require tourism (and space) to support them, certainly Western zoos. Rarely can they survive on purely on local visits alone. Residents of Wakefield would more then likely visit animal collections in nearby Leeds, if not going further afield to Yorkshire WP. Having had the misfortune of living in Stoke for a month, I can guarantee nobody would be a willing tourist. Anyway the revamped Peak Wildlife Park is not far away.Wakefield in England as well (well same exemple as before, other close cities have zoos like Chester but Wakefield doesn't have a large zoo afaik), I'd tend to list Stoke-on-Trent as well.
Having the misfortune of living close to Stoke its one big zoo of which its animal attraction in fenced off from the rest of Stoke to protect the animals from the people that live in Stoke.As for Peak I wouldn't waste my time these days it was far better when it was Blackbrook then it was a collection to be proud of!!I think this thread might be losing the plot. Cities with zoos, aquaria etc require tourism (and space) to support them, certainly Western zoos. Rarely can they survive on purely on local visits alone. Residents of Wakefield would more then likely visit animal collections in nearby Leeds, if not going further afield to Yorkshire WP. Having had the misfortune of living in Stoke for a month, I can guarantee nobody would be a willing tourist. Anyway the revamped Peak Wildlife Park is not far away.
My closest big city is Bath, which is already a tourist destination, does not have a zoo. It would be illogical/uneconomical to site one in the city based purely on the relatively close proximity of Bristol and Longleat.
Never seen as much security fencing as I have in Stoke... Pity about the transition of Blackbrook to Peak. The former had an amazing collection of birds, but I guess that just because you are sited near a big population/city does not guarantee financial stability for a zoo.Having the misfortune of living close to Stoke its one big zoo of which its animal attraction in fenced off from the rest of Stoke to protect the animals from the people that live in Stoke.As for Peak I wouldn't waste my time these days it was far better when it was Blackbrook then it was a collection to be proud of!!
It is surprising some of the places that do manage to support zoos. For example, the state I live in supports four zoos and is the least visited state in the USA. Somehow the zoos are supported.I think this thread might be losing the plot. Cities with zoos, aquaria etc require tourism (and space) to support them, certainly Western zoos. Rarely can they survive on purely on local visits alone. Residents of Wakefield would more then likely visit animal collections in nearby Leeds, if not going further afield to Yorkshire WP. Having had the misfortune of living in Stoke for a month, I can guarantee nobody would be a willing tourist. Anyway the revamped Peak Wildlife Park is not far away.
My closest big city is Bath, which is already a tourist destination, does not have a zoo. It would be illogical/uneconomical to site one in the city based purely on the relatively close proximity of Bristol and Longleat.
What about the city of Orlando Florida it’s a well known city (thanks to Disney and other stuff like that) and is directly in the center of my home-state sure it has the Central Florida Zoo and other animal attractions here and there but none the less this city has not a single offical zoo at least..
Well then I do admit I did make mistakes when writing my previous post but rest assured I do say you are right about the whole zoo thing and thus I should have made some more thought into my post so I apologize for my mistakes I did on my last post but they we all make mistakes every once in a while so yeah again I should have made more thought into my last post so basically I apologize for not thinking through with my actions and thus this is where I will conclude with this post..
Does eastern Iowa get enough tourists? A zoo in Iowa City would be nice but I would be curious how well it would do. Then again I guess nobody said it had to be a big zoo.I think I'll add a few opinions, I apologize if any of them have been previously mentioned.
I feel like Eastern Iowa needs a zoo of some sort. Iowa City has a good sized population, but the nearest zoos are a few hours away.
Myrtle Beach/Wilmington need a zoo as well. Wilmington has a good sized population and is close to a major US Navy base, but no zoo except the crappy Tregembo. Myrtle Beach has tons of tourists coming in every year, but no proper zoo. They do have Alligator Adventure and the monstrosity that is the Wacatee Zoo, but a proper zoo would be a good idea.
For Florida, Tallahassee and Cape Coral both are large areas without a major zoo. Naples is the closest to Cape Coral I believe but that's about an hour away
Guam could use a proper zoo as well. The zoo they have there is tiny, and not the best. I feel like if a proper zoo were to open up, although quite costly, it could be an interesting collection as I imagine it could obtain many rare species from Asian governments.
Tons of people round here go to Branson, although I'm not sure why. (I've heard it's terrible). Iowa City is home to University of Iowa, one of the state's top universities. The other major one is Iowa State in Ames (go cyclones!) but Des Moines is pretty close.Does eastern Iowa get enough tourists? A zoo in Iowa City would be nice but I would be curious how well it would do. Then again I guess nobody said it had to be a big zoo.
Myrtle Beach seems like a great place for a zoo as there are plenty of tourists. I wonder also if Branson, Missouri could support one. I know virtually nothing about that place so could be way off base.
I think I'll add a few opinions, I apologize if any of them have been previously mentioned.
I feel like Eastern Iowa needs a zoo of some sort. Iowa City has a good sized population, but the nearest zoos are a few hours away.
Myrtle Beach/Wilmington need a zoo as well. Wilmington has a good sized population and is close to a major US Navy base, but no zoo except the crappy Tregembo. Myrtle Beach has tons of tourists coming in every year, but no proper zoo. They do have Alligator Adventure and the monstrosity that is the Wacatee Zoo, but a proper zoo would be a good idea.
For Florida, Tallahassee and Cape Coral both are large areas without a major zoo. Naples is the closest to Cape Coral I believe but that's about an hour away
Guam could use a proper zoo as well. The zoo they have there is tiny, and not the best. I feel like if a proper zoo were to open up, although quite costly, it could be an interesting collection as I imagine it could obtain many rare species from Asian governments.
Does eastern Iowa get enough tourists? A zoo in Iowa City would be nice but I would be curious how well it would do. Then again I guess nobody said it had to be a big zoo.
Myrtle Beach seems like a great place for a zoo as there are plenty of tourists. I wonder also if Branson, Missouri could support one. I know virtually nothing about that place so could be way off base.
I thin another option would be trying to find a place east of there to get the population from Davenport