Tuli (Masai Giraffe) is noticeably pregnant. It is unknown when the calf is expected
Tuli gave birth to a male calf on August 15th, unfortunately, this calf (sired by Rocket from Toledo), as was her last calf, is a Masai/generic hybrid calf, which has 100% wasted several years in her reproductive life in adding value to the pure-Masai population.Tuli (Masai Giraffe) is noticeably pregnant. It is unknown when the calf is expected
That seems rather harsh to say the least.Tuli gave birth to a male calf on August 15th, unfortunately, this calf (sired by Rocket from Toledo), as was her last calf, is a Masai/generic hybrid calf, which has 100% wasted several years in her reproductive life in adding value to the pure-Masai population.
Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Welcomes Giraffe Calf
In all fairness, it is a correct observation. Hybrid calves (and moreover male calves to boot) typically do not actively participate in either species' breeding program and are destined to sit as display animals. Not to mention that breeding hybrid animals has little to no conservation or captive population-building purpose, which does absolutely waste reproductive potential that could've gone to producing more calves for a single species. This is especially true in regards to the Masai, which is currently the only pure species population held in US zoos. We really need every pure calf we can get in that regard.That seems rather harsh to say the least.
And I'm saying that people act like these calves are monsters and should be put down because they're hybrids. People were acting the same way when Franklin was born at Toledo.In all fairness, it is a correct observation. Hybrid calves (and moreover male calves to boot) typically do not actively participate in either species' breeding program and are destined to sit as display animals. Not to mention that breeding hybrid animals has little to no conservation or captive population-building purpose, which does absolutely waste reproductive potential that could've gone to producing more calves for a single species. This is especially true in regards to the Masai, which is currently the only pure species population held in US zoos. We really need every pure calf we can get in that regard.
I think this could be said to be a bit exaggerated as well. People can express their disappointment and frustration with the Zoo’s irresponsible management of these animals — wasting two whole calves and over four years of an animal’s reproductive lifespan on hybrid offspring of a species that needs more calves on the ground is extremely irresponsible — without that being a commentary on the animals themselves. Of course it is not the animals’s fault that they exists, but is very unfortunate in the grand scheme of the Masai giraffe population that these two hybrid calves exist.And I'm saying that people act like these calves are monsters and should be put down because they're hybrids. People were acting the same way when Franklin was born at Toledo.
I still think it's way to harsh and unfair to the keepers and vets who've watched these animals. Also, I don't care about genetic purity and honestly think it's overrated. The average guest isn't going to know the difference.I think this could be said to be a bit exaggerated as well. People can express their disappointment and frustration with the Zoo’s irresponsible management of these animals — wasting two whole calves and over four years of an animal’s reproductive lifespan on hybrid offspring of a species that needs more calves on the ground is extremely irresponsible — without that being a commentary on the animals themselves. Of course it is not the animals’s fault that they exists, but is very unfortunate in the grand scheme of the Masai giraffe population that these two hybrid calves exist.
The criticism of the production of these calves also isn’t a reflection of the keeper staff, necessarily, but rather of the staff in the Zoo’s management that has allowed for them to be produced, as those decisions are usually made well above the level of most keepers. I, myself, am a keeper, and I know that if the facility I work for was so nonchalantly allowing for the production of hybrid offspring from valuable purebred animals, I would be very upset, but that would not change the care I provide for those animals and I know it would not reflect on my own abilities to do my job.I still think it's way to harsh and unfair to the keepers and vets who've watched these animals. Also, I don't care about genetic purity and honestly think it's overrated. The average guest isn't going to know the difference.
I imagined that was likely the case, but that is still irresponsible management in my opinion. I have worked with many giraffe over many years, and yes, birth control in giraffe is certainly not always reliable and there are risks of permanent sterilization. With both of those being well known to be potential problems, other solutions really should have been determined — especially after the birth control failed the first time.Woah woah woah, I guess it needs to be stated that Tuli was on birth control during the conception of both calves. Giraffe birth control is notoriously unreliable, and there was no intention of her producing a calf with a generic male. These accident calves just happened before she could be transferred, with the first one delaying her transfer and the second one being conceived during the delay.
This calf was conceived in Toledo, so in any case this isn't a reflection of Cleveland's management. Tuli arrived already pregnant.As with many things, the truth's probably somewhere in the middle.
Cleveland's keepers are among the best in the business if you consider how long-lived so many of their animals are. As I'm sure many of us know, they do not make breeding decisions.
That being said, I've had a morbid curiosity with the ups and downs of giraffes at CMZ. They used to have a vibrant herd and an incredibly successful breeding program that seems to have been in decline for the last decade. I'm sure everyone's doing their best, but it certainly seems like something changed.
In my most cynical opinion, someone probably raised concerns about birthing a healthy hybrid calf. BUT . . . it's a baby. Everybody loves babies, and if there were a chance for a healthy giraffe calf, the admins would've encouraged it by any means necessary. Babies mean tickets and visits.
It reminds me of something I heard many years ago when Brian Zimmerman took over as CEO of the Cleveland Metroparks. He adamantly wanted to breed the elephants despite all of them being too old by the time he started.
His reasoning? Baby elephants are the biggest babies when it comes to marketing and attendance - and he's not wrong, but biology trumped business in that case.
And "accidents" happen. I know of at least one Cleveland giraffe calf that was the result of a happy accident when a past-her-prime female was briefly put in the same enclosure as a young male. Nobody expected a calf, but one was born, nonetheless.
Also, I don't care about genetic purity and honestly think it's overrated. The average guest isn't going to know the difference.
The newborn giraffe calf will make his public debut today. Naming options for a donation naming vote areTuli gave birth to a male calf on August 15th, unfortunately, this calf (sired by Rocket from Toledo), as was her last calf, is a Masai/generic hybrid calf, which has 100% wasted several years in her reproductive life in adding value to the pure-Masai population.
Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Welcomes Giraffe Calf