The only thing i cant agree on is the orang enclosure, it may not be perfect, but tiga & rajang seem to be ok in it and it is a massive improvement on the old one! It also affords better public viewing than others elsewhere which cost far more to build. It's certainly better than at least 2 other orang enclosures ive seen in the uk and less dated.
IMHO Colchester is probably one of the most improved and fastest developing zoos in the uk over the last decade or so and is now a top 5 rather than a top 20ish zoo!
I probably should have elaborated a little more on why I feel disappointed with the Orang-utan enclosure; I just didn’t want my post to be hugely long. (like this one!
I would like to add that Colchester is probably my favourite zoo and I also admire the way the collection brings in new species and continually evolves.
But i am not a fan of the enclosure and many of my opinions on the exhibit have been summed up by IanRobinoisn and Pertinax points.
My main issues are: -
•The fact that only about a third of the floor area of the building has been given over to the orang-utans with the majority being public floor space.
•As mentioned the aquatic exhibits could not have come cheap (especially the cylindrical saltwater tank) and I feel that the money could have been spent better else ware. A few standard tanks buried into the wall of the exhibit and maybe an aviary at one end would have been sufficient to add more diversity to the exhibit.(IMO)
•The lack of climbing opportunities, especially outside, is poor when much money has been spent elsewhere (the aquariums
•As Pertinax said the outside resembles a pit and is not attractive in my opinion. If the outer wall had been terraced to allow for planting it would have toned down the walls.
I overall would say the enclosure is average and would definitely agree that it is in an improvement on the old enclosure and that there are worse enclosures within the UK for orangs.
But it is the fact that the enclosure is new and took 4 years to construct with an equal amount of time spent talking of building the new enclosure, it is for this reason that I feel disappointed with the overall result especially considering the cost came in at £1.75milliion. Being in the construction sector I would estimate in the region of 60%-70% of the total build probably was spent on ground works to the enclosure. The whole enclosure is effectively below ground level and the cost of the excavation and construction of the retaining walls and tunnel through to the sea lion exhibit must have been phenomenal. (The zoo probably had to do this as a planning condition to minimise the visual impact of the development on the Listed church ruin). Considering this I would therefore question if it would have been better to of built the enclosure somewhere else within the zoo (perhaps where the new sun bear enclosure will be located or down where the lemur enclosures are?) and to have spent the money saved on groundwork’s on developing a better enclosure, more on a par perhaps with the Chester zoo realm of the red ape exhibit. I certainly couldn't see the enclosure housing a large family of orangs as Chester do.
I think the enclosure could be improved with more climbing apparatus, but IMO feel the location was not feasible in thge first place and that aspects of the design are fairly poor.
There are a few examples on zoolex that indicate the sort of quality of enclosure that can be built for Great Apes on a similar budget.
ZooLex Exhibit
ZooLex Exhibit
ZooLex Exhibit