No, don't worry @Coelacanth18 , I respectfully disagree with many of your arguments but there isn't any misunderstanding.
In fact I think you have added greater nuance to the discussion and raised some interesting points which I do appreciate.![]()
Good, that was precisely the balance I was attempting to strike
Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if I'm underestimating reproductive success in some of these species that Duke manages and that their facility has struggled to recruit holders - I know that has been a difficult situation for a lot of other taxa (ex. lots of ungulates - warty pigs, babirusa, onagers and kulan, Asian deer, etc). There is certainly a tough situation in which zoos choose to go with the most expedient and well-known options - the upside is that it may maximize their ability to fundraise for conservation efforts, the downside is that it means taking a less active role themselves in ex situ conservation. To their credit, some large zoos (and Duke, big thanks to them in particular) are trying to boost what lemur populations already exist, but there are plenty of other zoos that are fine to just keep and breed ring-tailed and ruffed for the foreseeable future. I'd hesitate to go as far as calling it a moral failing - there are plenty of reasons that might go into the calculus - but it's hard to know whether or not they are underestimating their own potential impact.
For what it's worth - in the event that there is a clear need to place more individuals from rarer lemur species within zoos - absolutely there are plenty of genetically unnecessary RTLs whose space would better be used to maintain current or greater species diversity in collections. Knowing the state that some are in genetically and demographically, however, it's hard not to have my view colored by pessimism about the chances of species like blue-eyed black, collared, crowned, and aye-aye lemurs persisting in captivity long-term - at least without future imports from Madagascar.