"Could've Been Better" Exhibits

Emanuel Theodorus

Well-Known Member
5+ year member
Do you have an exhibit that you thought it was good/alright, but you thought that the zoo could've done better on it?

For me, Dallas Zoo's Simmons Hippo Outpost is perfect design-wise, but I'm just ticked that the land area is smaller than it should've been. It could've been easily one of the country's best hippo exhibit if not for the rather small land area of it.

What are other exhibits do you think qualifies as "could've been-better"?
 
I think most exhibits have at least some places in which they can improve. While I've seen many very good zoo exhibits, I wouldn't describe any of them as perfect- as there's always (often unrealistic) ways to improve an exhibit.
 
The Clore Rainforest Lookout at London Zoo comes to mind.

Constructed in the sixties as the Charles Clore Pavilion, it was the zoo's take on a small mammal house, housing, for quite some time, more mammal species than any other UK zoo housed in its entire grounds. However, despite being two levels, the exhibit standards aged the worse in the zoo, and as part of its 21st Century recovery from the near death experience of the nineties, massive renovations had to take place. The upper level was converted to 'Rainforest Life,' the rainforest house from which the building derives its current name, and the lower level to 'Night Life,' a nocturnal house.

Both of these used to be far better. Rainforest Life used to feel extremely lively, full of free-flying birds, while armadillos scurry across the undergrowth bringing life to the forest floor. Currently, the whole exhibit feels incredibly barren. However, all the birds have either moved to the Blackburn Pavilion bird house or departed the collection, and the armadillos have passed away. Currently, only the Rodríguez Flying Foxes, who spend most of the day asleep, bring aerial life to the enclosure, while only wild mice and rats who snuck in bring life to the forest floor. The only real highlight are the Southern Tamanduas, a breeding pair and their offspring, who are regularly active and most likely the last remaining individuals of the nominate subspecies in Europe.

Even when the birds and armadillos were present, it was still an extremely weak rainforest house. The glass roof of the main mixed species exhibit is several metres above the dark, concrete roof of the visitors walkway, which means even though it is completely barrierless, nothing but the occasional callitrichid leaping along the walkway reminds you that you are actually sharing space with the animals. Raise the roof of the walkway, bring back some free- flying birds, and bring something lively to the forest floor (the zoo actually houses a pair of armadillo in the off-show Casson Terraces, the indoors for the Babirusa, that are only visible during displays), and you have one of the best small rainforest houses in the country. But as it stands, you have a mediocre and uninspiring house; not bad, but easily improved.

As for Night Life, it just feels so empty. Several species have three or four enclosures where just two would easily do the trick. Of course, the animals aren't complaining about more space, but it doesn't take a genius to realise that there used to be far more species present. Some enclosures are unapologetically empty, and there are entire walls where no enclosures are present, but such a thing could easily be added. Its agonising. That said, with Potto, Grey Slender Loris, and Moholi Galago, as well as Aye-Aye in a separate nocturnal habitat upstairs, I really shouldn't be complaining. And, of course, the good thing about having less species, is that most enclosures are far more spacious than what can be found at other nocturnal houses.

The Clore is not a bad exhibit, but compared to its past self and compared to what it could become with slight changes, it is massively underwhelming, hence my including it in this thread.
 
I think most exhibits have at least some places in which they can improve. While I've seen many very good zoo exhibits, I wouldn't describe any of them as perfect- as there's always (often unrealistic) ways to improve an exhibit.


I think the vibe I'm going for is more like you noticed that one flaw that you feel like it should've been fixed by now.

Of course, there are plenty of just fine exhibits that don't really need a lot of refurbishment unless you want to completely revamp it, but this is the ones that you feel like it should've been like this so its way better.
 
Also another one that I wanna bring up is definitely the nocturnal house in Batu Secret Zoo. It's fine, but filled with rather common species and could've been filled with rarer nocturnal species of Indonesia, such as lorises.
 
One example I saw recently was the Reef Lagoon at Sanctuary Aquatics. A 10000 gallon reef tank with live coral sounds impressive on paper (and it is!) but with only surface viewing getting good looks and photos of anything is difficult.
 
Back
Top