I thought it would be good to share this new inspection report on the allegations made against Dublin Zoo regarding animal welfare breaches, which found no evidence to support these claims.
The report is 256 pages, but from the little I've read, it sounds like it should be really interesting and worth a read. Here's an extract:
"The Report finds that of the 23 allegations made:
- Seventeen were considered to be ‘unfounded with no evidence supplied to support the narrative of the allegation’
- Two were found to have ‘no basis or evidence to even substantiate the allegation’
- Three were classed as ‘some evidence was found supporting a historical allegation, but Dublin Zoo had already resolved the case’ with changes in ‘process, facility or management’.
The one claim ‘considered to be supported as per the stated allegation’ was an issue regarding the development of the new red panda habitat as per the recommendations of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) best practice guidelines. However, the report also notes this recommendation had been assessed by the management and in the professional opinion and experience of Dublin Zoo it was not considered a concern by the senior team - which the investigation team recognised as being justifiable and consistent with the other percentage of zoos which house red pandas in a similar manner within the European and North America zoo population."
https://www.dublinzoo.ie/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Dublin-Zoo-Special-Inspection-Report-2022.pdf
The report is 256 pages, but from the little I've read, it sounds like it should be really interesting and worth a read. Here's an extract:
"The Report finds that of the 23 allegations made:
- Seventeen were considered to be ‘unfounded with no evidence supplied to support the narrative of the allegation’
- Two were found to have ‘no basis or evidence to even substantiate the allegation’
- Three were classed as ‘some evidence was found supporting a historical allegation, but Dublin Zoo had already resolved the case’ with changes in ‘process, facility or management’.
The one claim ‘considered to be supported as per the stated allegation’ was an issue regarding the development of the new red panda habitat as per the recommendations of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) best practice guidelines. However, the report also notes this recommendation had been assessed by the management and in the professional opinion and experience of Dublin Zoo it was not considered a concern by the senior team - which the investigation team recognised as being justifiable and consistent with the other percentage of zoos which house red pandas in a similar manner within the European and North America zoo population."
https://www.dublinzoo.ie/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Dublin-Zoo-Special-Inspection-Report-2022.pdf