Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Durrell news

Status
Not open for further replies.
LBJ is mainly a birding term, used for the small brown nondescript passerines which may be difficult to identify without a clear view. In the context of Gerald Durrell he uses it to refer to the small nondescript animals which zoos would typically ignore in favour of the large public-attracting animals.
 
LBJ is mainly a birding term, used for the small brown nondescript passerines which may be difficult to identify without a clear view. In the context of Gerald Durrell he uses it to refer to the small nondescript animals which zoos would typically ignore in favour of the large public-attracting animals.
Huh - good to know, thanks! So basically the XYZs of a zoo collection.
 
Ok ,so the bears are replaced by Giant Anteater.
Actually a rather good enclosure for that species.
I now doubt Durrell will have any cat 1 / carnivores again.
Sumatran tigers were rumoured a few years ago to fit with the Sumatran orangutans. Doubt this would happen though. Personally think Sun bears would be a good fit in this regard, especially after losing the Andeans.

Either way I don’t see them getting anything ‘big’ in the next at least 5 years. Their new gorilla house is currently under construction (due to open next year for Gerald Durrell’s 100th birthday) and then I imagine the construction for their new reptile house will begin that they fundraised for last year.
 
Sumatran tigers were rumoured a few years ago to fit with the Sumatran orangutans. Doubt this would happen though. Personally think Sun bears would be a good fit in this regard, especially after losing the Andeans.

Either way I don’t see them getting anything ‘big’ in the next at least 5 years. Their new gorilla house is currently under construction (due to open next year for Gerald Durrell’s 100th birthday) and then I imagine the construction for their new reptile house will begin that they fundraised for last year.

The previous CEO was reported to be very keen on getting tigers, but it was a ludicrous idea, which was fortunately resisted at all levels. I imagine she hoped that getting Mr Dick in from Longleat would advance her tiger agenda - now both have gone. I will be exceedingly surprised if the Gorilla house is open on time; nothing appears to have been happening up there for some time. But hope springs eternal.
 
TBH: I am not so dismissive of the idea of having more high profile species like sun bear, clouded leopard and Sumatran tiger at Jersey Zoo.

While I do believe Jersey Zoo should maintain its tradition and central theme with LBJ's in Durrell's philosophy of micro managing niche and low profile species that receive little attention from many mainstream zoological institutions, I do see a case for more high profile ambassador species to widen the financial exploitation and security for the zoo in this day and age.
 
TBH: I am not so dismissive of the idea of having more high profile species like sun bear, clouded leopard and Sumatran tiger at Jersey Zoo.

While I do believe Jersey Zoo should maintain its tradition and central theme with LBJ's in Durrell's philosophy of micro managing niche and low profile species that receive little attention from many mainstream zoological institutions, I do see a case for more high profile ambassador species to widen the financial exploitation and security for the zoo in this day and age.

Agree 100% with this. Great post
 
The previous CEO was reported to be very keen on getting tigers, but it was a ludicrous idea, which was fortunately resisted at all levels. I imagine she hoped that getting Mr Dick in from Longleat would advance her tiger agenda - now both have gone. I will be exceedingly surprised if the Gorilla house is open on time; nothing appears to have been happening up there for some time. But hope springs eternal.

Could you explain why do you think the idea of keeping Sumatran Tigers (and maybe other midsize threatened species?) is ludicrous?
As @Kifaru Bwana already wrote, Sumatran Tigers would fit in many ways in the concept of Jersey Zoo (or the Durell's philosophy). Remember also, that Jersey had other midsize, threatened AND public drawing species like Asian Lions, Bornean Orang-Utans or Sun Bears in the past.
And although Jersey isn't the biggest zoo size wise, there should be still space for a good tiger exhibit.
 
TBH: I am not so dismissive of the idea of having more high profile species like sun bear, clouded leopard and Sumatran tiger at Jersey Zoo.

While I do believe Jersey Zoo should maintain its tradition and central theme with LBJ's in Durrell's philosophy of micro managing niche and low profile species that receive little attention from many mainstream zoological institutions, I do see a case for more high profile ambassador species to widen the financial exploitation and security for the zoo in this day and age.

Jersey Zoo has (or had, when this was suggested) no staff experienced in keeping big cats, and does not have the space to accommodate them in ideal conditions. The expense would be very high, to build a secure enclosure - they haven't even finished the Gorilla House yet! There would be increased insurance premiums, given that someone previously burned down the visitor centre in protest at the feeding of calves to ... I think it was Asian lions, or maybe the Snow leopards. The zoo is very near inhabited areas, so if a tiger escaped, people would be in danger, not only from the tiger, but from any stray bullets used to kill or bring down the tiger. Then there would be an uproar about the killing of the tiger.
In any case, I don't think the States of Jersey would issue a permit for the import of tigers.
 
I do see a case for more high profile ambassador species to widen the financial exploitation and security for the zoo in this day and age.
FYI Most of Durrell's income does not come from gate money; big donors, grants, and legacies play a much bigger part. And the people giving these larger sums are likely to look closely at whether Durrell is making the best use of their money. https://www.durrell.org/media/tyhd3i2q/durrell-annual-report-and-financial-statements-2021-1.pdf
 
Jersey Zoo has (or had, when this was suggested) no staff experienced in keeping big cats, and does not have the space to accommodate them in ideal conditions. The expense would be very high, to build a secure enclosure - they haven't even finished the Gorilla House yet! There would be increased insurance premiums, given that someone previously burned down the visitor centre in protest at the feeding of calves to ... I think it was Asian lions, or maybe the Snow leopards. The zoo is very near inhabited areas, so if a tiger escaped, people would be in danger, not only from the tiger, but from any stray bullets used to kill or bring down the tiger. Then there would be an uproar about the killing of the tiger.
In any case, I don't think the States of Jersey would issue a permit for the import of tigers.

In defence of the previous poster their point was more that the zoo should have a balance of high and low profile species. I'm sure there are other high profile species that the zoo could accommodate other than cats.

Also the zoo has kept Gorillas and Andean Bears for many years so would people not have been in danger from them also?
 
In defence of the previous poster their point was more that the zoo should have a balance of high and low profile species. I'm sure there are other high profile species that the zoo could accommodate other than cats.

Also the zoo has kept Gorillas and Andean Bears for many years so would people not have been in danger from them also?
Jersey Zoo is experienced with these species and whatever dangers they present. The Bears were not very dangerous - if they had got out, they would probably have just climbed a tree and sat there for a bit, then been tempted back in with food. The Gorillas - well, I don't think we have ever had an escape, and when a child fell in, he was safely retrieved. Both these species are much more predictable, and easier to contain, than a tiger.
 
The zoo is very near inhabited areas, so if a tiger escaped, people would be in danger, not only from the tiger, but from any stray bullets used to kill or bring down the tiger. Then there would be an uproar about the killing of the tiger.

I get that there are various considerations to be taken into account whilst considering bringing in big cats.

Escape concerns and risk to neighbours is hardly one of them though. Urban zoos across the world manage to keep them without this danger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top