This is the first match these two collections have had within this round, and it's a very interesting category for discussion - MOUNTAINS AND POLES. Plenty of scope for discussion, I reckon - so I hold out hopes for a vibrant and active debate!
Legit question - what does Burgers even have that would constitute "Mountains & Poles". The only animal I could find when I visited were the seals, but that was years ago and they've long since gone.
Would "Only Wroclaw has relevant species" be an acceptable reason? That's a legit question, BTW.
Although this looks like it is shaping up to be a match where it won't take very much at all to justify a 5:0 vote, for the sake of consistency I need to ask @Mathijs to post explaining their vote in order for it to stand, even if it is only a sentence or two![]()
ok, simply, Arnhem has literally 0 species for this thematic, I would not count animals from tropical foothills fitting theme, since they mostly live in low land areas. Even with the bighorn sheep, I would still give Arnhem 0-5If one believes that's the case, and explicitly says so, yes.
I'm willing to accept the exhibit at Burgers which @Kalaw suggested as fitting the category for anyone who is uncomfortable with a 5-0 vote and wants to remain at 4-1 too, and naturally if anyone else has arguments for further Burgers exhibits I'd be interested to hear them.
For the sake of consistency I will also now need a post from @GiratinaIsGod relating to their post, too.
It's sad that this is burger's downfall but this match is really like an ant fighting against an elephant.
The bobcat absolutely would. It's just a shame it's no longer there.How about the bobcat and the North American porcupine at the desert house? Shouldn't they count too?
Do Cinerous Vultures and Turkey Vultures count for Burgers’?