What is a must see zoo & where is Zlin?
Before we get to the final new zoo to appear on the list I thought it would be good to re-iterate what for me the definition was of a must-see zoo when creating the list, as there was quite some discussion about (not) included zoos.
Let's start with the definition from the start of the thread:
I personally picked 50 zoos from across the continent that are in a way unique and/or do a very good job in highlighting a particular character found across Europe. This thread shows the full diversity of European zoos and the most important styles find on the continent. Of the 50 zoos some are the usual suspects, which just can't be ignored in these lists. But I hope I will be able to surprise everybody with some of the picks. I do not believe in rankings saying that one zoo is objectively better than the other, because a lot depends on personal taste. So this thread is no ranking and the order of zoos on the list is alphabetically (first by country, then within country). I am also not claiming that the zoos on this thread are objectively better than those that are not on the list. On the contrary, some very fine zoos did not make the cut, as they were not special enough, whereas some of the picks would never show up in any ranking of the top xx zoos in Europe.
What is important to highlight is that the aim was to show as much as possible diversity in terms of good zoos across the continent. Must see zoos can be ones based on:
- specialization and/or size of their collection, e.g. Apenheul or Dvur Kralove
- history (as long as it is still visible), e.g. Tierpark Hagenbeck or Menagerie/Jardin des Plantes
- good exhibitry, e.g. Burgers' Zoo or Tiergarten Nuernberg
- a unique location or set-up, e.g. Korkeasaari Zoo or Citadelle de Besancon
- Unique architecture, e.g. l'Oceanografic Valencia
- by being very good in a certain style, e.g. Zoo Magdeburg (cost-effective construction)
- A combination of multiple of the factors above, e.g. Zoo Berlin
@amur leopard - A zoo like Berlin both has a stellar collection and very significant historical architecture, so cannot be left out
Each of those factors make the chosen zoos unique in the European zoo landscape and while it includes many of the heavy-hitters, just being a heavy hitter isn't enough, just ask Tierpark Hellabrunn. In general when there were multiple options to choose from, I have tried to keep the number of similar zoos to a minimum. There is a case to be made that the unique early 20th century architecture of Zoo Budapest makes it a worthy inclusion. But the number of historic city zoos on the list is disproportionally high already. So my preference then went to zoos that have adapted better to the 21st century like Zoo Antwerp. That doesn't mean Antwerp is a better replica of Budapest, as Budapest still has features that Antwerp lacks, such as those mountains. But it only gets fun when choices have to be made, otherwise I could just as well have written a thread about "the zoos of Europe" and still be busy writing.
@Therabu - The historical architecture of Zoo Budapest is among the most significant of the continent
Writing a thread in the way I did, automatically creates winners based on the method. Apart from that 10 million liter tank with a manta ray, Nausicaa isn't a remarkable aquarium. But because that tank is so unique and well constructed, it had to be put in. To the loss of aquaria that lack such a showstopper but could well be described as better across the board like Oceanopolis in Brest and Den Bla Planet in Copenhagen.
The biggest loser in all this is probably Zoo Zlin in Czechia. This really is a very good zoo all across the board. Of all Czech zoos it probably has the smallest amount of bad enclosures and nearly all of it can be described as good. There is a number of lovely large aviaries, a superb bird collection and a smaller, but choice, mammal collection too. But I can't name a single enclosure or section that hasn't been done better elsewhere. Nor is there a unique style and there are plenty of other zoos with a castle on their grounds. Zlin is still a place I would recommend everyone to visit and in such a sense it is "must see", but it is not a "must see" for me based on the definition used in this thread.
@twilighter - The jaguar exhibit in Zlin is excellent, but it isn't unique
Whereas I think it is easier to define a must see zoo, defining what it means to be the "best" zoo is nearly impossible. Plenty of people have tried to come up with a list of best zoos, but the ones that aren't complete b*llshit are still mostly a reflection of a person's personal preference. There is no neutral framework which can be reliably used. Even if there would be agreement on the categories on which to score, how to score on them, would be an entirely different can of worms. But not all zoos are created equal and there is something of a consensus around to which zoos can be considered the top of the continent, at least from a zoo nerd point of view. These tend to be large zoos, with a relatively high number of species across multiple classes and at least some rarities. They also have impressive exhibitry, either from a modern or a historical standpoint and in general offer a unique experience. That doesn't mean they all have excellent animal welfare. But they are all destination zoos that form the core where a zoo trip is being planned around.
As something of a sidestep I tried to come up with a list of these top-xx zoos of Europe. I think that there would be quite a general consensus that the following zoos would need to be on it for sure (in random order):
1. Chester Zoo
2. Bioparc Doue-la-Fontaine
3. Zooparc de Beauval
4. Pairi Daiza
5. Zoo Antwerp
6. Burgers' Zoo
7. Koelner Zoo
8. Zoo Berlin
9. Tierpark Berlin
10. Zoo Leipzig
11. Tiergarten Nuernberg
12. Wilhelma, Stuttgart
13. Tierpark Hellabrunn
14. Zoo Basel
15. Zoo Zurich
16. Tiergarten Schoenbrunn
17. Zoo Praha
18. Zoo Zlin
19. Zoo Wroclaw
(you will note that almost all of these big boys are on the must see list too)
This would be quite shortly be followed by places like Diergaarde Blijdorp (until a few years ago, it would clearly be part of the list), Artis, Zoo Budapest, Zoo Copenhagen, Bioparc Valencia, Zoo Ostrava, Opole Zoo etc.
All of these zoos in the top list are either large (in terms of size, species numbers and/or attendance), have excellent exhibitry (in their own way), are at least somewhat all-round and stand out in their own way and have a large appeal. One might expect that spot 20 would be reserved for the Bohemian Mouse Mafia, aka Zoo Plzen. But apart from the extremely large small animal collection, it doesn't really fit among the big boys in my opinion. The current outlier in the list is Doue, which is the only of these zoos to have less than 750.000 annual visitors (a paltry 260.000), but in terms of atmosphere it is unique and it is currently hugely influential when it comes to design. I know many Zoochatters, but also well-travelled zoo professionals, who rate this zoo extremely highly.
@twilighter - There is no place quite like Doue
If my must see list would have revolved mostly about the big boys and the zoos in the stratum just below, it would have been a boring you know who. Fortunately there have been some nice surprises in the original list. But the final zoo on this list (for now) will be a well-known name for sure.