I too am still strongly disappointed by the omission of the African River and Forest expansions, even simplified versions with reduced species each would have been better than nothing. In my personal experience gorillas, penguins, and hippos in particular seem to be extremely popular zoo animals. For instance, my mom doesn’t really like zoos but she loves to go to the LA zoo just for the gorillas. The exclusion of the gorillas might be too big a blow, in general their popularity among non zoo nerds must not be taken for granted, many love them for their gentle playful nature, others still misunderstand them and would love to see them for how intimidating and dangerous they are, though would benefit from learning about their peaceful nature, and what better way to learn this then at a zoo! Not to mention their cultural significance in pop culture such as King Kong and Tarzan. Those three plus the chimps (technically Bonobos were originally planned, not chimps), Nile Croc for crocodilian and herp lovers, and not to mention the originally planned South American exhibit planned to exhibit jaguars and giant otters, would have (in my opinion) put the zoo on par with the likes of Omaha, St. Louis, and the San Diego parks. Obviously I still like the new plans, but I still think it’s too great a missed opportunity. I’d
Id rather see hippos or other exotic species over cougars, bald eagles, and the other Californian species, considering that is from SoCal already live in California and could see these species either in the wild or at other zoos and similar facilities focusing on native wildlife. The CALM zoo featuring cougars, eagles, and other California species like bears, bobcats, roadrunners, badgers, and more is just an hour and a half away from Fresno, and the aquarium is not too necessary and addition considering that Fresno is already so close to the Monterey Bay Aquarium. In general most would probably go to the zoo to see large land species anyways rather than fish, plus I feel that an aquarium should be a luxury that comes after a zoo has most of the more iconic zoo species already, though as previously mentioned the zoo won’t be getting the African apes, penguins, hippos, or jaguars anymore, which I would prefer over an aquarium.
I agree about the loss of Roo Valley, I’m actually a really big fan of the exhibit and find it to be an underrated Roo walkabout. It’s big enough for the Roos to get away from the path but small enough that you’re never too far from a Roo or emu even if they choose to stay off in the distance. It’s a very charming exhibit, and with its removal the zoo will lose even more iconic megafauna, roos, wallabies, and emus. Not to mention lose its Australian representation. If anything I’d rather they decrease the scope of their Valley Farm concept and leave enough space to add more Australian exhibits such as a cassowary, tree kangaroo, or even koala if possible and have them exhibited near the walkabout. Better yet though I’d rather the zoo kept their already existing wilderness falls and dino dig, perhaps incorporate a small petting zoo in that area, and return the Valley Farm space to its original proposed space as the South American exhibit. They could keep the SA walkthrough and add nearby exhibits for jaguars and giant otters, then move the flamingoes, anteaters, and squirrel monkeys to this section, basically a South American version of Kingdoms of Asia.