Don’t forget the new zoo board is made up of mostly non animal savvy people so I would not expect them to make a lot of informed decisions, I believe this is a backward step so they can tick all the woke boxes
While I accept that a reduction in species is necessary to provide the remaining species with exhibits of acceptable size (a trend we’ve seen across most city zoos in the region), I certainly don’t agree with the board’s phase out criteria. What constitutes as enabling is highly subjective and I fail to see how the Mandrill (who many visitors would be familiar with from the Lion King) and the Maned wolf (fox on stilts) fail to meet this criteria.
Another illogical phase out was the critically endangered Eastern bongo (critically endangered/endangered is a criteria) - apparently because one ran into fence. Taronga have proved a pair or single bull can be safely accommodated in a city zoo.