Thats Annoying. Is there one at Werribee? That’s obviously the best candidate. If I’m not wrong clouded leopards are gaining more interest in Australia, and with a soon to be empty enclosure, Caracal or clouded leopard could provide a good replacement(saying that red panda is one of my fav animals). I just feel like they suit the area they are in, and wouldn’t make a ton of sense in the carnivore precinct. Also, would it make sense to not get rid of the dingo enclosure, but rather decrease the size of it. Many would prefer a unique species in that exhibit, and although we have covered that maned wolf is extremely unlikely, it wouldn’t require an overly large amount of space. They also seem to be generating a lot of interest in the region, as clouded leopard is predicted toAnother thing to note, Melbourne plan to construct a Wildlife Hospital apart of their new masterplan. Not sure where this will be located within the zoo.
It’s an old one, it is on one of the pages in the old thread, I’ll try find itWhere is the new master plan
Thats Annoying. Is there one at Werribee? That’s obviously the best candidate. If I’m not wrong clouded leopards are gaining more interest in Australia, and with a soon to be empty enclosure, Caracal or clouded leopard could provide a good replacement(saying that red panda is one of my fav animals). I just feel like they suit the area they are in, and wouldn’t make a ton of sense in the carnivore precinct. Also, would it make sense to not get rid of the dingo enclosure, but rather decrease the size of it. Many would prefer a unique species in that exhibit, and although we have covered that maned wolf is extremely unlikely, it wouldn’t require an overly large amount of space. They also seem to be generating a lot of interest in the region, as clouded leopard is predicted to
Thats Annoying. Is there one at Werribee? That’s obviously the best candidate. If I’m not wrong clouded leopards are gaining more interest in Australia, and with a soon to be empty enclosure, Caracal or clouded leopard could provide a good replacement(saying that red panda is one of my fav animals). I just feel like they suit the area they are in, and wouldn’t make a ton of sense in the carnivore precinct. Also, would it make sense to not get rid of the dingo enclosure, but rather decrease the size of it. I’d prefer a unique species in that exhibit, and although we have covered that maned wolf is extremely unlikely, it wouldn’t require an overly large amount of space. They also seem to be generating a lot of interest in the region, as clouded leopard is predicted to
Another thing to note, Melbourne plan to construct a Wildlife Hospital apart of their new masterplan. Not sure where this will be located within the zoo.
Thats Annoying. Is there one at Werribee? That’s obviously the best candidate.
Where is the new master plan
It’s an old one, it is on one of the pages in the old thread, I’ll try find it
Ok great
It’s come to my attention that Zoos Victoria don’t stick to the criteria as much as they say they do. Complimentary species like I mentioned above are seen in various parts of the zoo, Such as Aldabra Tortoise, Hamadryas baboon, and even the Snow Leopard is only vulnerable. Imo clouded leopards would be a great boost to the carnivore precinct, and ZV have shown they are willing to accept animals even if they don’t fill more than 2 categoriesThere's one at Werribee and one at Healseville too.Melbourne already has one though off display, so I'm presuming this one will be an upgrade. I'd like to see one that's actually accessible to the public though. It'll be cool to check out a Seal that's being rehabbed or a Gorilla that's having a health check.
Caracal and Clouded Leopards both don't make a whole lot of sense unfortunately for Melbourne. Neither fit into at least two categories.
Another option for the enclosure is a Bird of Prey species, which I think I've mentioned on here before (credit to @Zoofan15 for this idea).Wedge Tailed Eagle would be a nice fit Healseville have a few individuals, and this species is not only enabling, but also an ambassador and can be used in displays and encounters.
It’s come to my attention that Zoos Victoria don’t stick to the criteria as much as they say they do. Complimentary species like I mentioned above are seen in various parts of the zoo, Such as Aldabra Tortoise, Hamadryas baboon, and even the Snow Leopard is only vulnerable. Imo clouded leopards would be a great boost to the carnivore precinct, and ZV have shown they are willing to accept animals even if they don’t fill more than 2 categories
I agree. Mandrills getting phased out was a complete shock to me, every time I would stop and admire them, joined by many others. On a side not, what did the numbers in the group reach, because I seem to remember there being a few.I’ve noticed that. Asian small clawed otter and Slender-tailed meerkat are another two examples - only fitting into the enabling category; had they gone on exhibit, the Lowland nyala would be another.
The criteria (especially enabling) is very subjective. Mandrill were certainly enabling; and African wild dog were endangered AND enabling.
I agree. Mandrills getting phased out was a complete shock to me, every time I would stop and admire them, joined by many others. On a side not, what did the numbers in the group reach, because I seem to remember there being a few.
That 5-6 sounds about right. I’d hope that if they get reintroduced there would be a far bigger troop. To my understanding. There is enough space in that exhibit right?They had three near the end; all three died in 2017. I believe they would've had maybe five or six maximum (back in the early 2000's), so only a small group.
That 5-6 sounds about right. I’d hope that if they get reintroduced there would be a far bigger troop. To my understanding. There is enough space in that exhibit right?
I agree. Mandrills getting phased out was a complete shock to me, every time I would stop and admire them, joined by many others. On a side not, what did the numbers in the group reach, because I seem to remember there being a few.
They had three near the end; all three died in 2017. I believe they would've had maybe five or six maximum (back in the early 2000's), so only a small group.
I thoroughly agree. The current exhibit could maybe only hold around ten mandrills at max. So a group of a male, three females plus their offspring would probably be best.