Get To Know Animals - New Collection Epping Forest, Essex

Alwaysevergreen

Well-Known Member
I wanted to wait until I had seen @TNT review on his thread, and I didn't want to hijack his post by any means, but today I spent 4 and a half hours in the company of Rob Baxter, who is the partner of Donna Rose who owns GTKA.

There is much in what TNT posts which I agree on, but I want to give an alternative viewpoint as to my own findings at the collection.

I arrived shortly before 10.45am today, for me I must learn never to rely on Google Maps, it still takes you to the old address in Chingford, some 5 miles away, and you would be greeted by an empty shop. For anyone planning a visit, the correct postcode is CM16 5HW, make sure you use this to avoid the delayed trip I had today.

The front of house staff, are very friendly, and I must say the booklet given on entry is one of the more informative guides and maps given out by a zoo for free. It highlights the zoo is very much an interactive zoo, and details all they have to offer.

Now myself as well as paying £15 to get in, which most might seem a little steep for an entry fee to a small inside zoo, I paid £175 to take part in an ultimate experience and monkey experience.

I didn't expect the day to go from around 11.30am to 3.00pm. It wasn't constant, as Rob had to go out and take phone calls and do the odd handling of a snake with other guests, but he showed me around the whole zoo, got out many of the animals, allowed me to get many photo's of them, and told me a lot about the back stories of the animals.

Rob was very much into his animals, and his passion shone through.

TNT in his report commented about the Blue Light setting in the Nocturnal house, and it is something I raised with him as well. He did actually tell me that they would soon be moving to a red light setting in the nocturnal house, so if it was Rob who TNT had a discussion with, it is clear that his suggestions were well received and have been implemented.

The zoo is a mixture of adequate exhibits, to small exhibits, there is barely a square inch that isn't backed with animals. It is very much an interactive zoo, all the animals bar a few new additions are used to being handled and make for an enjoyable experience if you are in to that sort of thing.

I know that TNT isn't and I'm sure many other "Zoo Enthusiasts" that frequent this forum won't be, but for me, it was more about photography than handling of animals. I wanted images of animals I hadn't seen before and to add nice photos to the thousands I have on my hard drive.

One thing I noticed TNT hadn't picked up on, was the "Party Room" which is twice the size of the "fluffy's" area and this is where a lot of kids meet and greets take place. There are also two function rooms upstairs as well, and room for a few more exhibits, in what is called the Treehouse.

There is also a bit more space behind the zoo, which they can branch out in to. This will allow perhaps the opportunity in time for the birds to move outside. I am not aware if these areas were visible for TNT when he visited, or he knew of them.

The heavy mix of "ex pet" birds was also unsettling a little for me, and would have been my crab point of the visit. I actually got to go in there and see some of the birds up close and personal favourites were the Turaco, Fancy Pigeon and the Galah who all came close. There was a Cockatoo called Nigel, who lets say was a bit brash!
The reason there are two African Grey's in a separate exhibit is because they don't get on with the group so had to be kept separate. Rob did say one or two of the birds would be moving soon.

A good point was made about the American Alligator and it was a subject I brought up with Rob, it could be said, that with extra space they have, an exhibit could be created in the future, but it was also said, that at some stage when she gets bigger she may have to move on.

The Squirrel Monkey's exhibit was not small, it was not huge either, but there was plenty to enrich them. I got to go in with them and the male Malcolm jumped all over me, sat on my shoulder and ate out of my hands. I appreciate this is not something all on here agree with, but it was an enjoyable experience for me nonetheless.

The Binturong made an appearance later in the day, after my experiences had ended and Rob fed him "Dusty" early, so I could hopefully see him. He came out to eat before going back into his house. He said when it's quiet he comes out a lot, but has only joined them recently and getting used to his surroundings. They do not do any experiences with him, and he is not an animal who can be handled or interacted with. All photo's I got of him were outside his exhibit.
Rob did say, if he didn't become more showy and settled better, they would have to look into moving him to another collection and getting something more suitable in his place. I saw this as the zoo being Proactive, and I actually felt, he could have benefited more from being in the Squirrel Monkey exhibit, which whilst not as big, would be a lot less noisy. Time will tell whether he stays or moves on, but I did see him later in the day.



I got to photo and meet a number of reptiles in the experience and it was enjoyable to photo the Chameleons and Skinks, as well as seeing all the Gecko's, holding some and the snakes.

The reptiles were an enjoyable mix of pet shop animals and I was impressed by the amount of Chameleon's held.










Like TNT, the highlight for me, was the Nocturnal area. This will be going red light setting in time and the highlight of the day was meeting "Armond Willow" the 9 Banded Armadillo. He was allowed out his exhibit and we followed him around the zoo, as he wandered around, posed for some photo's, sadly so many out of focus and deleted, had a few snacks and went back to his exhibit. Luckily it was quiet enough for him to roam the zoo for 10-15 minutes impressing those who were visiting and allowing me to see and touch him, he is a lovely animal and looks so much more impressive outside of the light settings.



I then got to meet the Grey Short-Tailed Opossum, who was very active and allowed for photo's, before we fed the Cloud Rats and Gambian Pouched Rats.

The Jerboa was going mad in his exhibit, pacing and running about, so a picture would have been impossible.

There is also Sugar Gliders, Fat Tailed Jird and Skunks (of which there are three babies) in this area.



I can appreciate that this zoo may not be everyone's cup of tea, and that some people are not into interactive zoos, but they do have some space to expand in to. The owners are considerate of the conditions and the animals and are making changes as they go to make things as good as they can be.

There are a few rarities along the way and the experience allowed me to get photos I am happy with and I am happy to share with the site as above.

There will be progress and change, and I would suggest to TNT to visit again in the future, when under red light, when the upstairs is open, when they have completed work out the back and had time to implement suggestions people have made to them, and time has allowed the animals to settle in.

This zoo was 15 months in the making and they have recently only taken on paid staff. I enjoyed my day and the experience side of it, I also enjoyed chatting to Rob at length about the collection and it's direction. Everything is ex pet or zoo surplus and it's an enjoyable collection.

Even if interaction is not your thing, the staff are happy to show and chat and are very passionate and I feel most people will enjoy a visit. I certainly did.
 
I would also like to add, that the 9 Banded Armadillo is not a recent import, as someone questioned on TNT's thread. It was actually someone's pet and it got a bit too much for them and was offered to GTKA a few months ago, and they gladly took him on.
 
From what I've gathered from your and TNT's review, this is a place run by a guy who is clearly passionate about helping animals and introducing people to them. It's not even that far from where I live - about an hour and a half away or so. It definitely feels, though, like you'd NEED to book an experience to get the best value out of it.

My main concern is the whole cramped-feeling about the place, not just for the enclosures but the site in general. I've never been good with crowded spaces, and I fear I wouldn't be fully comfortable.
 
From what I've gathered from your and TNT's review, this is a place run by a guy who is clearly passionate about helping animals and introducing people to them. It's not even that far from where I live - about an hour and a half away or so. It definitely feels, though, like you'd NEED to book an experience to get the best value out of it.

My main concern is the whole cramped-feeling about the place, not just for the enclosures but the site in general. I've never been good with crowded spaces, and I fear I wouldn't be fully comfortable.

It was not cramped today, so my advice would be go on a school day in term if your work patterns allow. about 30 people visited all day today. I suspect school holidays it will be rammed.
I suffer a bit from depression and anxiety and I’m not a great social person, so I don’t like crowded place also, it makes me uncomfortable, but I was perfectly happy there today.

Hope that helps .
 
Another good insight into what’s obviously a passion project. Good to see they plan to make some good improvements and they are obviously bothered about welfare.

As in my comment in the other thread I’m not into animal handling and with many wild creatures I don’t find it very fair or a good thing to be doing.

So one I’ll be missing though goodness knows some of those species are worth seeing.
 
Interesting - in the US this would be a "roadside zoo", but in the UK, it's a "passion project".

Indeed - it is very similar to a fair few facilities that are looked down on here in the US and considered "too hands on." Would be very solidly roadside category in the states but apparently it's 'passion project' in the UK. Funny how lines are drawn.
 
Interesting - in the US this would be a "roadside zoo", but in the UK, it's a "passion project".

I think in fairness roadside just isn’t a word that is in my everyday language.

Less drawing of lines more difference in that.

I’d use the same term ‘passion project’ in my head about some US collections where the term roadside is used. We just don’t use ‘roadside’ really so it wouldn’t have occurred to me. I’ve obviously seen it used in this forum and get it from a zoo chat POV but it’s not a regular expression. We don’t have stuff at the side of the road in the same way - most of these obscure places are in the middle of nowhere. So factually nowhereside :)

The one thing that might mean roadside is at least understood in general terms here would be from the programme tiger king but the term tiger king is used when drawing equivalence with the chap in Nottingham here with two lions (irony) not roadside so it hasn’t penetrated much generally I’d say.

Incidentally I also wouldn’t use the term facility for a collection but we know what we mean.

I was seconded in the USA for a while and there’s quite a lot of language differences in everyday life. Don’t let’s talk about fanny packs, for example.

I wouldn’t visit the equivalent ones in the US either if they had the same emphasis as this on animal handling / challenging husbandry. But that’s purely my view and not saying anything about people who want to. These are all personal things vs universal ones imho.

Other people may think roadside of course, or have a different view, just mentioning why I happened to use the ‘passion project’ term.
 
Last edited:
As someone not too familiar with English zoos may I ask what does GTKA stand for?

EDIT: Oh wait I just realized it is Get To Know Animals : P
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNT
I wouldn’t visit the equivalent ones in the US either if they had the same emphasis as this on animal handling / challenging husbandry. But that’s purely my view and not saying anything about people who want to. These are all personal things vs universal ones imho.

There are a lot of hands on zoos (staff and public) that I've seen you post about Lafone, so surprised you wouldn't visit.

Ark being one, allow close encounters with many of the animals, have free reptile handling talks, and often for many of the sanctuaries / Rescue places, it's their only way to generate better income, as they can't provide luxury exhibits big zoos can and most of the animals are ex pet trade, or seizures.

Every animal at GTKA is a rescue, zoo surplus or unwanted pets, so it could also be mentioned that these animals will have been very much used to human interaction all their life, and when too much for owners given away, to take away all that they had previously known, could in my opinion effect their quality of life. With birds it is very different, as they will often re-wild very quickly, but most imprinted animals, are very hard to wild once a high level of imprinting has been established. But I find it strange that you would "choose" to not visit this collection, as they try to boost their income with experiences and handling sessions, when you have spoken in defence of other collections who do exactly the same?
 
Interesting - in the US this would be a "roadside zoo", but in the UK, it's a "passion project".
I definitely agree but I do want to ask which roadside zoos in particular does it remind you of?

We don’t have stuff at the side of the road in the same way - most of these obscure places are in the middle of nowhere. So factually nowhereside :)
I apologise for nitpicking your statement, but that is also true for for the US. In the US, everything is far apart there, connected with roads that go through the middle of nowhere or rural ares which is where most roadside zoos tend to be located in.
 
There are a lot of hands on zoos (staff and public) that I've seen you post about Lafone, so surprised you wouldn't visit.

Ark being one, allow close encounters with many of the animals, have free reptile handling talks, and often for many of the sanctuaries / Rescue places, it's their only way to generate better income, as they can't provide luxury exhibits big zoos can and most of the animals are ex pet trade, or seizures.

Every animal at GTKA is a rescue, zoo surplus or unwanted pets, so it could also be mentioned that these animals will have been very much used to human interaction all their life, and when too much for owners given away, to take away all that they had previously known, could in my opinion effect their quality of life. With birds it is very different, as they will often re-wild very quickly, but most imprinted animals, are very hard to wild once a high level of imprinting has been established. But I find it strange that you would "choose" to not visit this collection, as they try to boost their income with experiences and handling sessions, when you have spoken in defence of other collections who do exactly the same?

Well I can't say I am altogether consistent nor claim it :)

I get the experience part (though it isn't for me, lots of big and small zoos do it) handling reptiles if people are skilled in it (though again I do worry about the impact on the animals) but general handling / husbandry are things I look for.

Ark is also a rescue but has more outside space for the animals. The all inside nature of this particular place puts me off. I wouldn't not give them my money / donate on an amazon wish list etc though, I don't believe they should be closed or not raise funds for improvement. I've donated to various places, including one or two I have never been to.

What a species list though. And it's not remotely a judgement on anyone who wants to go, it's a personal thing isn't it. I enjoyed your review and TNT's very much! I am often inspired for a visit list by posts here and there are new ones just from TNT's trip so far.
 
I definitely agree but I do want to ask which roadside zoos in particular does it remind you of?


I apologise for nitpicking your statement, but that is also true for for the US. In the US, everything is far apart there, connected with roads that go through the middle of nowhere or rural ares which is where most roadside zoos tend to be located in.
It reminds me a lot of Animal Adventures, any of the SeaQuest locations, and especially the infamous Sustainable Safari.
 
It reminds me a lot of Animal Adventures, any of the SeaQuest locations, and especially the infamous Sustainable Safari.
I've just had a look at this "Sustainable Safari" place in the gallery - it looks awful. How they think it's appropriate to hold all of the small to medium-sized mammals that way amazes me... Has there been much of a kick back about the place?
 
Well I can't say I am altogether consistent nor claim it :)

I get the experience part (though it isn't for me, lots of big and small zoos do it) handling reptiles if people are skilled in it (though again I do worry about the impact on the animals) but general handling / husbandry are things I look for.

Ark is also a rescue but has more outside space for the animals. The all inside nature of this particular place puts me off. I wouldn't not give them my money / donate on an amazon wish list etc though, I don't believe they should be closed or not raise funds for improvement. I've donated to various places, including one or two I have never been to.

What a species list though. And it's not remotely a judgement on anyone who wants to go, it's a personal thing isn't it. I enjoyed your review and TNT's very much! I am often inspired for a visit list by posts here and there are new ones just from TNT's trip so far.

From the look of this place, its one I doubt I would want to visit either - but admittedly I don't get to many places these days so tend to be pretty selective anyway! I think personally, there is a difference between a zoo that offers some level of animal contact 'experiences', and one that exists primarily to do these. Get To Know Animals - well, the name alone suggests its in the latter category, and like you the cramped indoor nature of the place doesn't exactly sell it to me.

Incidentally I have done the fox experience at the Ark, you get to go in the enclosure but as it is so large the foxes don't have to come anywhere near you. I was lucky enough to be able to touch Sox the fox who is very tame (I was told to take my cap off before going in as he might try to steal it!), the rest of them pretty much got on with their day and didn't pay me much attention. It certainly didn't feel too intrusive although I accept that others might disagree.
 
It reminds me a lot of Animal Adventures, any of the SeaQuest locations, and especially the infamous Sustainable Safari.
Since you were able to bring up what GTKA reminds you of I may as well bring up what it reminds me of.

Now if Ms. Rose and Mr. Baxter are checking this thread I do want to apologize before hand for mentioning GTKA along with the odious facilities I will be mentioning. My intent is that GTKA reminds me of these places but not that it is as bad as they are.

GTKA reminds me of Russian shopping mall zoos and Yoshinori Horii’s current Meccha Omoroi Doubutsuen (which you can see in my thread dedicated to Horii’s antics.) Based on @TNT ’s thread, the place is stuffed with animals left and right while the space for visitors seems to be pretty narrow which is why it reminds me of Horii's menagerie. As I said, GTKA is not as bad as these places, but I would still describe it as a better version of them.

Regardless of my comparison, unlike Horii, I could see the GTKA crew trying to find ways to improve the living standards of their animals. If I did live in the UK I would give this place a shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNT
GTKA reminds me of Russian shopping mall zoos and Yoshinori Horii’s current Meccha Omoroi Doubutsuen (which you can see in my thread dedicated to Horii’s antics.) Based on @TNT ’s thread, the place is stuffed with animals left and right while the space for visitors seems to be pretty narrow which is why it reminds me of Horii's menagerie. As I said, GTKA is not as bad as these places, but I would still describe it as a better version of them.

I personally think that is a tad harsh. I would not say the place is cramped, nor is it very narrow. There are rooms which handling sessions are done in, if busy, and there are plenty of benches people can sit down in. It certainly isn't a case of no human space. Most rooms the animals are around the sides and plenty of room in the middle. With the busiest room, there is obviously limited room, as there is a big Binturong exhibit in the middle, but then there is a bench at the end of that exhibit you can sit and watch in, plus most people don't seem to wait endlessly to look at reptiles. The Nocturnal room, is open in the middle and again has a bench.

It's small and obviously if there was 100 people there it could be busy, but it's not likely most people would spend a day there, maybe an hour or so, so there would be a constant trickle of people, I doubt there is ever a time, it's crammed and unable to move, so I personally wouldn't say space is narrow for people.

I personally have found going to some bigger zoos on a day when there is thousands of people there, more frustrating as it very much feels over crowded.

I would say very few people spend more than an hour at GTKA.

I also feel the thread has gone a little off track.

It was put up about GTKA, as there was not a thread for the collection, and it now seems to have been turned into a thread about worldwide small town zoos that most people dislike, think shouldn't be there and are "roadside" zoos, which is a shame, as anyone stumbling on the thread may not see the thread as news of a new collection, and see it as a thread that is more about zoos people don't like or don't wish to visit.

Perhaps mods could create a new thread called Interactive zoos and thoughts and move the content which identifies as such on to that, as I feel this thread is going off track now, and will get further away from the zoo in question at this rate, and anyone who sees this thread will see very little about GTKA and more about small "roadside" zoos most people won't visit.
 
I personally think that is a tad harsh. I would not say the place is cramped, nor is it very narrow. There are rooms which handling sessions are done in, if busy, and there are plenty of benches people can sit down in. It certainly isn't a case of no human space. Most rooms the animals are around the sides and plenty of room in the middle. With the busiest room, there is obviously limited room, as there is a big Binturong exhibit in the middle, but then there is a bench at the end of that exhibit you can sit and watch in, plus most people don't seem to wait endlessly to look at reptiles. The Nocturnal room, is open in the middle and again has a bench.

It's small and obviously if there was 100 people there it could be busy, but it's not likely most people would spend a day there, maybe an hour or so, so there would be a constant trickle of people, I doubt there is ever a time, it's crammed and unable to move, so I personally wouldn't say space is narrow for people.

I personally have found going to some bigger zoos on a day when there is thousands of people there, more frustrating as it very much feels over crowded.

I would say very few people spend more than an hour at GTKA.

I also feel the thread has gone a little off track.

It was put up about GTKA, as there was not a thread for the collection, and it now seems to have been turned into a thread about worldwide small town zoos that most people dislike, think shouldn't be there and are "roadside" zoos, which is a shame, as anyone stumbling on the thread may not see the thread as news of a new collection, and see it as a thread that is more about zoos people don't like or don't wish to visit.

Perhaps mods could create a new thread called Interactive zoos and thoughts and move the content which identifies as such on to that, as I feel this thread is going off track now, and will get further away from the zoo in question at this rate, and anyone who sees this thread will see very little about GTKA and more about small "roadside" zoos most people won't visit.
Yes, but it is all discussion related to GTKA, even if not directly. All of the discussion above have been in relation to the collection.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, but it is all discussion related to GTKA, even if not directly. All of the discussion above have been in relation to the collection.

Well personally whilst I get your point, this zoo is absolutely nothing like Sustainable Safari, which houses 99% of animals in awful exhibits.

The fact is, GTKAS is pretty much a Reptile zoo, with a few extra's. They are all rescues as well. The exhibits are considerably larger than that of Sustainable Safari, and it is nowhere near as intrusive as that place looks and certainly doesn't hold species like they do.

I would say the Binturong exhibit which is the largest at GTKA would probably be big enough for 5 sustainable safari exhibits.

I just feel this place is being dragged down and judged, without people having been there. The only one exhibit I disagreed with at GTKA was the aviary area, which was overstocked.

But the thread is in danger of making the zoo look something it's not. Bar a Binturong and the Squirrel Monkey's none of these animals (with exception of the birds) are kept in different sort of exhibits than they would be at most zoos. The nocturnal room, is not awful given most animals are singular, and are certainly kept in similar/small show exhibits at many zoos.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since you were able to bring up what GTKA reminds you of I may as well bring up what it reminds me of.

Now if Ms. Rose and Mr. Baxter are checking this thread I do want to apologize before hand for mentioning GTKA along with the odious facilities I will be mentioning. My intent is that GTKA reminds me of these places but not that it is as bad as they are.

GTKA reminds me of Russian shopping mall zoos and Yoshinori Horii’s current Meccha Omoroi Doubutsuen (which you can see in my thread dedicated to Horii’s antics.) Based on @TNT ’s thread, the place is stuffed with animals left and right while the space for visitors seems to be pretty narrow which is why it reminds me of Horii's menagerie. As I said, GTKA is not as bad as these places, but I would still describe it as a better version of them.

Regardless of my comparison, unlike Horii, I could see the GTKA crew trying to find ways to improve the living standards of their animals. If I did live in the UK I would give this place a shot.
It will be like Horii, if they kept lions and llamas in there instead of nothing bigger than a large lizard
 
Back
Top