FunkyGibbon
Well-Known Member
Well I guess we'll see. But Ahtari simply can't afford the rent, and no-one could think that they could, so there must be more to ii than that.
I thought all pandas had to be rented?
It caused significant financial distress to Adelaide too.
It does depend on the zoo and its location - and of course the exchange rate - but generally, yes, around that figure.
If you look the vocabulary of when Denmark made something of a diplomatic push to get pandas, it was stated quite clearly they had been given the right to host the pandas, whereas here the pandas themselves are the gifts. I think it would be quite embarrassing, for China, if Finland turns out to be paying rent on them. But I grant that it's still not something known.
On the Ähtäri Zoo website it explains how the 'compensation' paid to China is spent; 70% to conservation of pandas in the wild, 10% research and 10% to management. So it would seem that Ähtäri are paying a fee of some sort for hosting the pandas.