This is great, but too bad the article does not state how they got them.The zoo has announced it cares for pangolins:
Endangered: Gladys Porter Zoo caring for seven pangolins
It was likely a direct wild capture from Togo (which the article mentions as origin) and import to Gladys Porter, or perhaps they were held for a time at the Pangolin Conservation place in St. Augustine. Some will have been born, but not conceived in captivity.This is great, but too bad the article does not state how they got them.
The zoo has announced it cares for pangolins:
Endangered: Gladys Porter Zoo caring for seven pangolins
I don't think Zoologica (the private organisation through which the pangolins were imported) is the same as Justin Miller's "Pangolin Conservation" place. I can't find anything about Zoologica online, but I haven't seen the two names connected otherwise.It was likely a direct wild capture from Togo (which the article mentions as origin) and import to Gladys Porter, or perhaps they were held for a time at the Pangolin Conservation place in St. Augustine. Some will have been born, but not conceived in captivity.
Based on the Pangolin Conservation's posts on Facebook today, they are one and the same:I don't think Zoologica (the private organisation through which the pangolins were imported) is the same as Justin Miller's "Pangolin Conservation" place. I can't find anything about Zoologica online, but I haven't seen the two names connected otherwise.
(bold is my addition).Today is Endangered Species Day, and after four years of work we're proud to announce the Pangolin Consortium. This is a collaborative group comprised of six public zoos and PangolinConservation.org. The Pangolin Consortium is focused on research, education, and conservation.
okay, that is interesting then. I wonder why he would use two different names for the same thing.Based on the Pangolin Conservation's posts on Facebook today, they are one and the same:
(bold is my addition).
Source: Pangolin Conservation
Yes, very strange indeed. On the PC website it is also mentioned they are under parent organization "Zoological Conservation" which is an organization I've never heard of and can't seem to find anything about.okay, that is interesting then. I wonder why he would use two different names for the same thing.
Yes, very strange indeed. On the PC website it is also mentioned they are under parent organization "Zoological Conservation" which is an organization I've never heard of and can't seem to find anything about.
A sorry state that a tiger is treated like that as an individual by people ...., Truly sad!!!Aw, poor baby! The zoo posted on Twitter that he's in stable condition, so that's good. Say they're gonna look for a home for him now.
A sorry state that a tiger is treated like that as an individual by people ...., Truly sad!!!
However, I do not think the tiger cub will be able to stay long term at the GPZ zoo. They simply do not have . Also, I would have serious doubts as to its subspecific status. It surely would have to undergo a genetic test for starters to find out its origins.
This episode also underlines once more that there is a rather under the radar, unaccredited and uncontrolled network of tiger holders that are not part of any coordinated tiger programs and whose captive conditions might be questionable, sub-standard or totally lacking in catering for the basic needs of tigers in captivity.
Speaking of which, anyone know if they still have that sea turtle with the missing flipper? Lost it because of a fishing net and got sent to the zoo. That's an animal I remember very well, even though I haven't been to GPZ in over 10 years.