Great White Shark plan

Chlidonias

Moderator
Staff member
15+ year member
not sure about this. Hardly seems like the shark's welfare will be paramount....

Plans floated for live great white shark attraction - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
18 June 2013

Plans have been unveiled for a floating aquarium to house a great white shark off Port Lincoln in South Australia.

The project's director, Travis Nottle, has outlined the idea for a $35 million shark discovery centre to the Port Lincoln Council.

It is proposed visitors would be taken to the centre by ferry.

Mr Nottle says the centre could be a significant new tourism attraction.

"Basically a world-first idea that leverages off of success that's been happening in North America," he said.

"Creating a floating piece of infrastructure, a significant floating piece of infrastructure, to temporarily accommodate a live great white shark in captivity, temporarily, with the shark's health and wellbeing [at the] forefront of the design."

He says the aquarium would enable people who cannot or do not want to dive with sharks, to observe a great white at close range.

"So that people feel safe, it's a protected area, in terms of sea state conditions, wind and swell," he said.

"It's also very close so you don't have to go as far - basically you are in the shark's home but you're not out in the open wild ocean."
 
I can't see this getting necessary state and federal approval. They are threatened species and this doesn't appear to have any species recovery benefit.
 
A large shark pen around the fish pens should reduce the problem of seals getting in with the fish. As long as the sharks does not get in with the fish.
 
Interestingly Monterey bay have decided not to keep Great White Sharks in captivity any longer. They had limited success with them and "found no significant increase to visitation after the first White shark". Also one of the sharks they had died not long after release. They found that the sharks either didn't eat in captivity, or ate everything else in the exhibit.
So I find it interesting that they're saying its based off the success being had in North America since the only place that I'm aware of keeping them in North America is no longer doing it because of lack of success.
 
Interestingly Monterey bay have decided not to keep Great White Sharks in captivity any longer. They had limited success with them and "found no significant increase to visitation after the first White shark". Also one of the sharks they had died not long after release. They found that the sharks either didn't eat in captivity, or ate everything else in the exhibit.
So I find it interesting that they're saying its based off the success being had in North America since the only place that I'm aware of keeping them in North America is no longer doing it because of lack of success.

I wouldn't call Monterey's great white shark exhibit a "lack of success", per se. They actually were entirely successful with what they set out to do, which was to capture a young great white and keep it alive and healthy in their Outer Bay exhibit for a limited period of time. When the young shark showed agression and attacked its tank mates they released it, as was their plan. They did this several times.

Now they have decided, for whatever reasons, that they will no longer do this. I agree with you completely that this Australian group's plan is a bad idea, but there is a model of keeping great white shark's in captivity that Monterey has demonstrated.
 
It's only a matter of time before this happens...
Jaws 3 The motionless Shark - YouTube
what! Louis Gossett Jr! Dennis Quaid!! I haven't seen that movie in so long I was completely unaware they were in it.

It's worth pointing out for younger viewers that Jaws 3 was in 3D [or what passed for 3D in those days] hence the weird glass-breaking effect.

And also sharks in those days didn't move when they swam. Scientific fact.
 
Back
Top