Staten Island Zoo Has anybody been to the Staten Island Zoo?

DavidBrown

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Howdy. Have any of our New York ZooChat friends been to the Staten Island Zoo, and if so, do you have a review of it? Would you recommend this zoo?

I find this zoo intriguing as it seems to be mostly a "zoo in a box" with most of its exhibits in a large building. What are the highlights of this zoo? They used to be famous for having all of the world's rattlesnake species. I see from some recent posts that they seem to be trying to rebuild their rattler collection...have they reassembled it to its former glory?
 
I visited the zoo yesterday - I've been to all other New York City zoos many times, but this was my first visit to Staten Island Zoo and I found it an interesting little place. I'll upload the photos over the next few days, but, since there isn't much information about this place on ZooChat, here is the brief review:

A zoo is small - 8 acres, according to Wikipedia - but has a diverse collection with particular focus on reptiles, especially snakes (understandably there is no megafauna, with exception of leopards). It's the only New York City zoo not managed by WCS. Most of the collection is indoors and concentrated in one building, which has a small entry room (old aquarium which seems to be under renovation as all the tanks were empty of water), a long hallway housing the reptiles (Carl F. Kauffeld hall of reptiles), and two side wings: Tropical Forest and Africa.
 
The zoo has long been famous for its reptile collection, and at one time under the curator Carl Kauffeld that collection included every species and subspecies of rattlesnakes of the United States. I am not sure if that feat has been repeated anywhere... In any case, their reptile collection is still good and majority is exhibited in the Carl Kauffeld Hall of Reptiles. It's basically a long hall, with medium-sized terrariums along both sides, and a large terrarium in the middle. Right before the entrance there is a terrarium with Chinese crocodile lizard where I also saw two unsigned snake-neck turtleswhich looked like McCord's. Along the right side of the hall are exhibits for mission golden-eyed frogs, Panamanian golden frogs mixed with green-and-black dart frogs, tentacled snakes mixed with a Fly River turtle, rock rattlesnakes, Solomon Islands leaf frogs, European fire salamander, axolotl, New Caledonia giant gecko, patch-nosed snake (a new species for me), an extremely tiny tank for a young African dwarf crocodile, Chinese water dragons, green tree python mixed with emerald tree boa, Henkel's leaf-tailed gecko mixed with giant day gecko, frilled lizards mixed with an unsigned blue-tongue skink, starred agamas mixed with unsigned Mozambique girdled lizard, Taiwan beauty rat snake mixed with red-tailed rat snake, an exhibit which supposedly housed scheltopusik - that was very lush and I only saw white-lined geckos there instead (though scheltopusik might have been hiding), crested basilisk, Mwanza rock agamas, panther chameleon, rhinoceros iguana, and Philippine sailfin lizards.
 
Thanks for the review and the reply to my long unanswered thread:)

The gallery shows that the zoo had a scimitar-horned oryx baby in the recent past. Is that animal still at the zoo? (I'm assuming not since you mentioned that the only large mammal is a leopard).

What are the current outdoor exhibits at the zoo? The map on the very sparse zoo website shows otter and ostrich exhibits.
 
Along the left side of the hall are the terrariums for the venomous collection: Gila monster, Aruba rattlesnake, eastern diamondback rattlesnakes (one normal and one leucistic) mixed with unsigned Carolina box-turtle, timber rattlesnakes, Uracoan rattlesnake, Kanburian pit-viper, Arizona black rattlesnakes, Samar cobra, cottonmouth, red spitting cobra, Gaboon vipers, dusky pygmy rattlesnakes, Sri Lankan pit-viper, South American rattlesnakes (one normal and one leucistic), Egyptian cobra, Trans Pecos copperhead, eyelash pit-viper, Northern Pacific rattlesnakes, desert massasauga, terciopelo, forest cobra, and a reticulated python.

In the middle of the hall is a large exhibit with desert landscape, which as I understand formerly housed part of the rattlesnake collection. On the day of my visit there were no rattlesnakes there, and the inhabitants included a beaded lizard, a roadrunner, a few Gambel's quails, a burrowing owl, and some Colorado River toads. In Addison there were three or so very small terrariums build into the center wall, which housed small species of rattlesnakes. Only one of them had a sign (Grand Canyon rattlesnake), and the other two housed what I think was a sidewinder and a rock rattlesnake.

The hall also has a window into behind the scenes area where several small terrariums could be seen. On the day of my visit they housed a northern copperhead, a small Uracoan rattlesnake, mottled rock rattlesnake, Tamaulipan rock rattlesnake, Queretaran dusky rattlesnake, a small Aruba rattlesnake, and eastern massasauga.

At the end of the hall is a room with two large semi-aquatic floor-to-ceiling exhibits. The one on the right housed a green anaconda and a red-tailed boa constrictor, while the one on the right was split into two sections: one housing two American alligators and the other two Chinese alligators
 
That's a pretty decent herp collection. Would the zoo be worth visiting if I went to New York or should I focus on the WCS facilities and other New York tourism stuff?
 
The Tropical Forest wing starts with three glass-fronted water-filled tanks. The first one houses silver arowana, red-bellied pacu, and red-tailed catfish, the second - two African pygmy geese mixed with Merten's water monitor and red-bellied short-necked turtle, and the third - Annam leaf turtle, yellow-headed temple turtle, and Australian snake-necked turtles (the last exhibit was also supposed to have tawny frogmouth but I did not find it). On the other side of the room is a cave with two semi-nocturnal exhibits: one for blind cave fishes and the other one for short-tailed leaf-nosed bats. Then there are more (all-indoor) exhibits: Goeldi's marmosets, Geoffroy's spider monkeys (I saw 3), keel-billed toucans, fossas (I saw 2), a binturong mixed with Prevost's squirrel, large mixed species exhibit where I saw a green oropendola, green aracaris, wattled curassow, red-billed blue magpie, Nicobar pigeon, superb starlings, two Patagonian maras, and a Hoffman's sloth (that same exhibit also had signs for white-eared titi, Geoffroy's marmoset, hawk-headed parrot, and blue-crowned motmot, but I saw neither of those despite hanging around for a while and catching feeding time), and another mixed species exhibit with one tamandua, one emperor tamarin, one cottontop tamarin, boatbill heron, scarlet ibis, sun bittern, cattle egrets, Venezuelan troupials, and saffron finches. Finally, at the end of the Tropical Forest wing there were a few unsigned small terrariums: one of them housed some gecko species, and Indian star tortoises were in another.
 
That's a pretty decent herp collection. Would the zoo be worth visiting if I went to New York or should I focus on the WCS facilities and other New York tourism stuff?

If you've never been to NYC and have limited time, Bronx is a must, and lesser WCS zoos are interesting too and for me were always a priority over Staten Island. That's actually the number one reason why I've never been to Staten Island zoo up until yesterday, despite visiting NYC countless times. Another reason is transportation. While other NYC zoos are accessible by subway, I don't think you can take a subway to Staten Island. I've never done this myself but I heard that a trip there would require some sort of ferry and multiple buses. I don't like driving in NYC so almost never have a car there. Because Staten Island zoo is located on the outskirts of NYC and has it's own parking I figured I will just drive there - which I did yesterday, despite the drive taking 3 hours one way:)

All that said, I liked the Staten Island zoo. It is small but has an interesting collection which is actually growing at the moment. I am planning to give a detailed list on this thread, so if you see something that interests you, you'll be able to decide for yourself. Despite a long drive (over 7 hours) I still consider that the visit was worth it for me.
 
The last section in the main building is Africa. The first exhibit (which formerly might have housed Amur leopards and is definitely too small for them) houses two servals. Next to them is a terrarium with giant day gecko, Standing's day gecko, and false tomato frog, and an artificial baobab tree with a dark glass-fronted exhibit for Moholi galagos inside. After that is an exhibit for African crested porcupine, another exhibit for meerkats and Taveta golden weavers, and a large mixed species exhibit for klipspringers, more crested porcupines, grey crowned crane, crested guineafowl, violet turaco, golden-breasted starlings, superb starlings, white-headed buffalo-weavers, African green pigeon, and perhaps some other birds, since almost no birds were signed (I think I saw some mouse-birds as well, but they were pretty far away and I might have mis-identified them). Across the room are exhibit for black and white ruffed lemurs (I saw 3) and another exhibit for ring-tailed lemurs mixed with some birds (I only saw Decken's hornbills, and there were also signs for pied crows and superb starlings). Finally there is a terrarium for big-eyed tree frogs.

This wraps up what I've seen on exhibit in the main building. The main building is surrounded by some outdoor exhibits, which I will describe soon.
 
Another reason is transportation. While other NYC zoos are accessible by subway, I don't think you can take a subway to Staten Island. I don't like driving in NYC so almost never have a car there. Because Staten Island zoo is located on the outskirts of NYC and has it's own parking I figured I will just drive there - which I did yesterday, despite the drive taking 3 hours one way. Despite a long drive (over 7 hours) I still consider that the visit was worth it for me.

Thanks very much for the many details that you are supplying us with in regards to the Staten Island Zoo. There is actually a pretty good little book on the establishment (written by famous zoo historian Ken Kawata):

https://www.amazon.ca/New-Yorks-Big...=1475031517&sr=1-2&keywords=staten+island+zoo

Your discussion in terms of driving reminds me just how large New York City is. I can recall (in 2012) visiting the New York Aquarium and then driving at least 2 hours all the way to the Long Island Aquarium...and then touring that facility and driving 2 hours almost all the way back to the original aquarium before heading south. Whew!
 
Thanks very much for the many details that you are supplying us with in regards to the Staten Island Zoo. There is actually a pretty good little book on the establishment (written by famous zoo historian Ken Kawata):

https://www.amazon.ca/New-Yorks-Big...=1475031517&sr=1-2&keywords=staten+island+zoo

Your discussion in terms of driving reminds me just how large New York City is. I can recall (in 2012) visiting the New York Aquarium and then driving at least 2 hours all the way to the Long Island Aquarium...and then touring that facility and driving 2 hours almost all the way back to the original aquarium before heading south. Whew!

Thanks for the link! Should be an interesting read. I've read some of the books written by Kauffeld, so was somewhat familiar with the zoo history, but don't have Kawata's book in my library. Time to change this:)

By the way, is Long Island still considered a New York City? Anyway, NYC is indeed immense, and I can easily imagine driving for hours from one end to another. To put things in perspective, the 3 hours drive I was talking about was from my home in Baltimore to Staten Island, and while driving I crossed the states of Maryland, Delaware, and New Jersey. And as you are saying, it would take just about this much time just to drive across New York City:)
 
Last edited:
Here goes the rest of the review - the outdoor exhibits surrounding the main building.

First of all, there are three medium-sized paddocks, all fenced with wire mesh (and, except for the first one where it is possible to get up close to the mesh, are not photographer-friendly): the first one houses a few red kangaroos and two emus; the next a single double-wattled cassowary and some unsigned pheasants (I saw golden pheasants and a Swinhoe's pheasant - by the way pheasants seem to be another specialty of this zoo, I saw more species than in most bigger zoos I've been last paddock is called "Sahara" and houses 3 scimitar oryxes, and pair of ostriches, and two Southern ground hornbills. By the way, the three paddocks house 3 species of ratites between themselves, and there is also a greater rhea elsewhere, which makes a total of 4 species - another specialty.

Next there is a new exhibit for Amur leopards. They had 2 specimens on exhibit. I liked the exhibit - it is decent in size, nicely landscaped, has places to hide, a pool (though I doubt leopards would use it much), and the viewing is either through glass window or through a mesh which my camera could easily focus through. If leopards were really kept in the African wing of the main building before, then this is a definite improvement.

Then there is a row of aviaries for birds of prey: the first one houses an Eurasian eagle owl, the next one great horned owl mixed with a turkey vulture, and the last one (seems to be twice the size of the other two) 2 bald eagles. Next to the aviaries is an exhibit for foxes - it's the first time I saw 2 species of foxes mixed in the same exhibit: yesterday I saw 3 red foxes and 2 Arctic foxes all living together.

The zoo also has two older-style "corn crib" cages: one had 2 palm-nut vultures mixed with 2 pied crows; the other housed Canadian porcupines.

Next, there is a an open-top exhibit for 2 North American river otters with underwater viewing area (which is located underground and directly behind the main viewing area)

Finally the zoo has a Children section which happened to surprised me the most. I usually skip children sections in zoos, and was going to skip that one as well (the first thing you see before you even enter the section is a feeding paddock for goats, and I am not really interested in this stuff). However, the zoo is small and I had time to kill so I decided to come in and have a quick look. Turned out to be a good decision since in addition to goats, sheep, donkeys, and chicken there is a fair bit of exotic species. First of all the was a small open-top paddock with a pool and the mix of following species: one beaver, two emperor geese, a red-breasted goose, a cereopsis goose, two black swans, a wandering whistling duck, a domestic Chinese goose, and two Toulouse geese. Then there was an enclosure that looked like a chicken coop, but had a good collection of pheasants (all males): satyr tragopan, Himalayan monal, Amherst's pheasant, golden pheasant, and green jungle fowl (there was a pair of the latter - cock and hen). Then there was an enclosure for woodchuck with a log house, but i did not see any residents. Then a duck pond: black-neck swans, Indian spot-billed duck, Philippine duck, mandarin ducks, Chiloe widgeon, Puna teals, marble teals, ringneck teals, North American ruddy ducks (I did not see them, but the signs also listed smew, common goldeneye, and Baikal teal). Then another pheasant aviary - this one had 3 ocellated turkeys, 1 Temminck's tragopan, 1 Cabot's tragopan, 1 Himalayan monal, 1 Reeve's pheasant, 1 Elliott's pheasant, 1 Palawan peacock pheasant, and 1 golden pheasant. Finally there were 3 paddocks: one for 2 capybaras, another for coscoroba mixed with some medium-sized Galapagos tortoises (and a rhea in a separate paddock in the back), and a last one with some sulcata tortoises
So in terms of number of non-domestic species, the children section exceeded the rest of the outdoor exhibits put together. I was glad I decided to check it out:)

And this wraps up the review of the Staten Island zoo.
 
Thanks for the review and the reply to my long unanswered thread:)

The gallery shows that the zoo had a scimitar-horned oryx baby in the recent past. Is that animal still at the zoo? (I'm assuming not since you mentioned that the only large mammal is a leopard).

What are the current outdoor exhibits at the zoo? The map on the very sparse zoo website shows otter and ostrich exhibits.

Oryx are still at the zoo. I did not really mean that leopards are the largest species - oryx, ostriches, kangaroos are also large. I meant to say that the zoo did not have much of the charismatic megafauna that is popular in zoos (great apes, bears, large cats, elephants, rhinos, giraffes, etc.). As much as I love hoofstock, I don't consider them to be classic zoo megafauna (unless they are giraffes or zebras) - and the regrettable US-wide decline of hoofstock collections confirms this:(
 
Oryx are still at the zoo. I did not really mean that leopards are the largest species - oryx, ostriches, kangaroos are also large. I meant to say that the zoo did not have much of the charismatic megafauna that is popular in zoos (great apes, bears, large cats, elephants, rhinos, giraffes, etc.). As much as I love hoofstock, I don't consider them to be classic zoo megafauna (unless they are giraffes or zebras) - and the regrettable US-wide decline of hoofstock collections confirms this:(

Couldn't one saw that bison, camels and arguably wildebeest are classic zoo megafauan?
 
Couldn't one saw that bison, camels and arguably wildebeest are classic zoo megafauan?

Perhaps... There is no clean definition of what constitutes zoo megafauna, so it's subjective. Wildebeest are uncommon in US zoos - I've been to over 70 zoological institutions in the US, and never saw a wildebeest in a traditional zoo (only saw them in safari parks). Camels are mostly used for rides...
 
Staten Island Zoo had a juvenile chimpanzee, a baby jaguar and lemurs in the early days; loads of reptiles throughout the zoo's history; a pair of solenodons in 1937!; a Pel's fishing owl in 1935...the only one in the USA at the time; jaguars and sun bears in the 1940's; 5 big cat species and 7 cat species in total in 1948; many chimpanzees over the years and the last chimp left in 1989; but the zoo has mainly been famous for its extensive rattlesnake collection.
 
Staten Island Zoo had a juvenile chimpanzee, a baby jaguar and lemurs in the early days; loads of reptiles throughout the zoo's history; a pair of solenodons in 1937!; a Pel's fishing owl in 1935...the only one in the USA at the time; jaguars and sun bears in the 1940's; 5 big cat species and 7 cat species in total in 1948; many chimpanzees over the years and the last chimp left in 1989; but the zoo has mainly been famous for its extensive rattlesnake collection.

Thanks for the info! I imagine that most of these animals were also residing in the main building. You won't see solenodon or Pel's fishing owl anywhere today...
 
Staten Island Zoo had a juvenile chimpanzee, a baby jaguar and lemurs in the early days; loads of reptiles throughout the zoo's history; a pair of solenodons in 1937!; a Pel's fishing owl in 1935...the only one in the USA at the time; jaguars and sun bears in the 1940's; 5 big cat species and 7 cat species in total in 1948; many chimpanzees over the years and the last chimp left in 1989; but the zoo has mainly been famous for its extensive rattlesnake collection.

I was just reading about the weird history of these solenodons at the zoo.

This pair were apparently a personal gift to the zoo director from the dictator of the Dominican Republic Rafael Leonidas Trujillo.
 
Back
Top