@Hipporex: As a friendly note, copying tracts of text verbatim from uncredited sources is plagiarism. You should cite Wikipedia (and ideally the sources used by Wikipedia) after (some of?) your "Fun Facts".
Also, perhaps this reflects my limited knowledge of palaeontology, but I don't understand why you wrote this:
Edit: Thinking about this, I guess you just meant to write "phylogenetic taxonomy" rather than "phylogenetic bracketing". In that case, I'd argue the two systems are most useful combined, with the Linnaean system defining and ordering phylogenetic groupings. See: Are the Linnean and Phylogenetic Nomenclatural Systems Combinable? Recommendations for Biological Nomenclature.
Also, perhaps this reflects my limited knowledge of palaeontology, but I don't understand why you wrote this:
I'll be using phylogenetic bracketing rather than Linnaean taxonomy as it is most accurate
Edit: Thinking about this, I guess you just meant to write "phylogenetic taxonomy" rather than "phylogenetic bracketing". In that case, I'd argue the two systems are most useful combined, with the Linnaean system defining and ordering phylogenetic groupings. See: Are the Linnean and Phylogenetic Nomenclatural Systems Combinable? Recommendations for Biological Nomenclature.
Last edited: