It seems like 2 new (or old, but renovated) aviary have opened along with the pantanal, the Africa aviary and the wetland aviary.
In earlier articles they mentioned that poison dart frogs are apart of the complex as well. There exhibit appears to be opposite to the emerald tree boa/smoky jungle frog exhibit and next to the anacondas. I also want to say that the 2 new aviarys are actually called the savanna & waterbird aviaries. The savanna aviary is made out of the old shoebill exhibit if I recall correctly.Just realised that I wrote Panatal(above) instead of Pantanal,mea culpa....no matter,at least I didnt say,as per Kevin the video presenter(Kevin Hodge ,General Curator?),that Baird`s Tapir is found in the Pantanal...which is my above point.The Jaguar exhibit looks fantastic, I love the way the building outside of the zoo pokes over the top of it all,and I dont mean that sarcastically - Im an urban zoo fan. The whole thing is a showstopper but even so,I would have preferred rather more smaller species,there are no amphibians or inverts for instance.
Is the exhibit indoors or outdoors? I can’t tell.Log into Facebook | Facebook
I haven’t seen that many photos of the zoos new anaconda exhibit that’s featured in the pantanal exhibit so here ya go
Generally we have pretty mild weather here in Houston in January, average highs in the low 60s, lows in the high 40s to low 50s, but it's not uncommon at all for an occasional day in the 70s. If we do get a serious cold front (overnight lows no lower than the low 20s), it usually lasts no more than two nights (with daytime highs around 50) and then it warms back up pretty fast. January is one of our lowest months for rainfall, we actually get a lot of crisp, sunny weather. It's actually a great month to visit, especially if you want to escape nasty northern weather.Is there anyone here that's experienced Houston weather in January and how it affects a zoo visit? The Pantanal is obviously what I'm eyeing to cover on my channel but I need every element and animal to be available for view.
Same here! Especially because the seals need a new exhibitI am also really looking forward to the Galapagos themed area next year!
OK, me more so since it will highlight the conservation work at the forefront Houston Zoo is doing within the Galapagos. It has been a long standing tradition thanks to vet and science teams.Same here! Especially because the seals need a new exhibit
Is there anyone here that's experienced Houston weather in January and how it affects a zoo visit? The Pantanal is obviously what I'm eyeing to cover on my channel but I need every element and animal to be available for view.
Yeah, it would be one thing if the out-of-range species were "filler" species either in mixed enclosures or by themselves in smaller enclosures, but the Baird's tapir is a highlight of the Pantanal exhibit, despite being found nowhere near the Pantanal.A name can /will be just a name for most zoo visitors,but if there is real interpretation of what and where the Panatal is, then the interested zoo visitor will find a number of species that do not live within thousands of miles of the named region. Why things have always to have "sexy" names these days defeats me...whats wrong with "The Neotropics" for instance? That apart it looks fantastic...but im not surprised, CEO Lee Ehmke certainly knows how to design zoo exhibits.
I’m personally excited for this new exhibit because of the possibility of new imported species from the Galápagos Islands.(but that’s very unlikely)OK, me more so since it will highlight the conservation work at the forefront Houston Zoo is doing within the Galapagos. It has been a long standing tradition thanks to vet and science teams.
While Baird's tapirs are not, lowland tapirs are and are an important part of the ecosystem. Lowland tapirs are of a lesser conservation concern and are a phase-out species within the AZA, so it makes sense to use the more endangered species with a growing populations and SSP as a stand-in. You can still tell the same story even if the species is not 100% accurate. Would you rather there not been a tapir species at all than the wrong one? This is very similar to how Amur leopards are used as stand-ins for (most often) African leopards in African exhibits, or how the Cervid TAG was pushing for non-subspecific wapiti to be replaced with Bactrian deer in North American exhibits (unfortunately, this did not catch on. It would have been nice to see this species spread).Yeah, it would be one thing if the out-of-range species were "filler" species either in mixed enclosures or by themselves in smaller enclosures, but the Baird's tapir is a highlight of the Pantanal exhibit, despite being found nowhere near the Pantanal.
Whereas I do understand the rationale for AZA and its target species conservation breeding programs, I am no supporter of any phase out where almost over night the species of which individuals are still living in captivity become worthless and are (then) neglected to the point their biological needs (of which reproduction is one) are ignored forthwith.While Baird's tapirs are not, lowland tapirs are and are an important part of the ecosystem. Lowland tapirs are of a lesser conservation concern and are a phase-out species within the AZA, so it makes sense to use the more endangered species with a growing populations and SSP as a stand-in. You can still tell the same story even if the species is not 100% accurate. Would you rather there not been a tapir species at all than the wrong one? This is very similar to how Amur leopards are used as stand-ins for (most often) African leopards in African exhibits, or how the Cervid TAG was pushing for non-subspecific wapiti to be replaced with Bactrian deer in North American exhibits (unfortunately, this did not catch on. It would have been nice to see this species spread).