How Corrupt Is Your Country?

Oh well your absolute lack of subtlety on Franco issue and from what I see, any other political issue, is more than surprising, is ever quite disgusting besides being incredibly wrong, but thanks for honestly revealing your communist stalinist political leanings, it's more than sad that you defend vehemently the most atrocious mass assasins of innocent people in the recent history of mankind.

I totally disagree but then again I would because I despise any kind of fanaticism (including religious and antireligious ones, and the fanaticism that you are showing in this thread too) and I absolutely hate extremism and terrorism and I'm disgusted by war crimes and criminals (most of which were commiteed by people of your same branch of political tought).


No I'm actually not showing any "fanaticism" in this thread.

I was just asking you to state more on your position that Spain is currently in a phase of corruption that is unprecedented and at its highest in the entire history of the country which is a rather large and extravagent claim to make.

I brought up the subject of the Franco regime merely out of interest because as is well known it was one of the most corrupt periods of modern Spanish history and I was frankly quite suprised that you were ignoring this (now I see why).

If I used the word "fascist" to describe your political leanings and it offended you then sorry but I don't know what else to call this kind of view as Franco was a textbook 20th century totalitarian fascist in terms of politics, labour relations, economic pollicy, role of millitary and aesthetics.

Its a free world and you are entitled to your beliefs but currently I am just challenging you on your assumptions and biases and encouraging you to look at Spanish history with more objectivity.
 
Last edited:
Dear Onychorhynchus coronatus,

Let me start at the last point discussed, the Franco regime. And let me say that probably nor you nor myself are in the best position to discuss that. I do not know your age, but guess that perhaps you are born after Franco death (1975) and ever after arrival of democracy to Spain (1978). If so, nor you nor myself know the Franco regime from our own experiences, but from outside references. Yours, seemingly, are the reading of history books and some visits to Spain, and maybe some talks with friends. Mine are besides my whole life in Spain, many talks with my parents, who, by the way, advice me against the books and films dealing with this period of Spanish history, as they present a false view of the subject, those due to authors from the left as well as those due to authors from the right. Of course, my parents, and specially my father, have read a lot of such books and seen a lot of such films as to be able to compare them with their experiences.

After discussing the subject with him, I see that all countries have periods of their history that are not a source of pride for their people, rather the opposite. And I see also that is quite diffucult to rate any government from any country or from any time as the best or the worst in history. And that for several reasons, being the main one the unavoidable lean to apply our today values and ideas to times and societies which had values and ideas very different. It is very easy today to blame the Inquisition at Middle Ages, the witch burning at seventeenth century or the slave trade at eighteen century, but at these times these actions were “politically correct”, and often was the society and not the the civil or the church authorities who claimed for applying measures which are unacceptable today.

As for the Franco regime, as for all the past or present regimes, we cannot say that it was completely bad nor completely good. It was mixed. Hitler regime did some good things besides many evil ones, and the same can be said of the regimes of Stalin, Mussolini or Kim-Il-Sung (this last regime, by the way, still alive). Discussing it on depth cannot be done here, nor cannot be judged now as one unique thing. It was not the same at the beginning, along the Civil War, along the postwar, the difficult times of the forties, along the fifties, when Spain entered the UNO and the ambassadors returned to Spain, or along the sixties, when the country approached more and more the values of the other European countries. Thus, I will not enter to discuss that subject. Let me say only that my parents families (parents, grandparents and grandgrandparents ) count several victims killed either by one or by the other side, and the same happens in the families of their friends. And, had I time or space, I would be able to supply you at least as many instances of evil behaviour from the Spanish left as you can supply me from Spanish right, and getting back along time, surely many more.

Second point: the current government of Spain. Well, after being informed myself better, I cannot say that it is the worst government in Spanish history, as our country has suffered much worse rulers even in the twentieth century. The reign of Ferdinand VII was worth of blame and that of Charles II was much worse. And today other countries have regimes underscoring the Spanish one by a long way. I cannot discuss this point openly, and besides that it would take too much space. But let me address only the subject of corruption, which is the main subject of this thread. Well, Spain has a lot of corrupt people as probaby have many other countries, and many of them are found among the politics from all political parties, but the damage done to the country because of corruption of important members at the current government surpasses all the levels known in Spain since the beginning of democracy. Even corruption at Franco times was milder, because then there were only a few persons getting money this way, and now there are thousands or even tens of thousands. But there is a way to clarify this point: Transparency International mantains a page with the ranking of Corruption Index for 179 countries. For 2020, Spain is not included among the top ten, nor even among the top hundred countries. She has the 147th place on the ranking, 32 places above New Zealand, the country with the least corruption index. However it should be mentioned that already on the first year of today’s Spanish government (2020) the index increased two points against that of 2019.

By lack of space and time I cannot discuss no more the subject of your hate of religion. But of course I disagree from your viewpoint. Catholic Church, and many other confessions, are to be ashamed of their activities in the past, but now the times of intolerance have been left for the history, for some communist countries and for some fundamentalist islamic confessions. However the Church should apologize for past evils. Indeed, the Pope John Paul II did so, recognizing the past errors and apologizing for these. But do not forget that today and always, this Church have members who had been notable for the charity job they had done, even some that received the Peace Nobel Price for that. Still the Christians belong to the faith with most victims of war or persecution, over 200 million right now. The atrocities made to arab christians by the Islamic State in Syria and Irak are not so far in time and similar ones are on the way in several countries of Asia, Africa and America.

And finally, let me comment shortly your qualification of “fascist” to me, or my qualification of “communist” to you. Of course, this is nonsense. These words should be never used to insult or disqualify the opponent. For either he is indeed a “fascist” or a “communist”, or is not. In the first case he will take the insult as a source of pride, because he or she feels him- or herself deserving these words and is glad of them, thus these are not insulting. And if is not, then the words are not deserved and the insulting part is wrong. I think that this is the case among us and that we not deserve these words. Thus, by my side I withdraw that qualification.

I finish remembering the past declaration of the European Parlament, published the 19th September 2019 with the title Importance of European Historic Memory for the Future of Europe, where “fascism” and “communism” are equaled and condemned together (as expected, to disengage from the condemn, communists have read “fascism” and “stalinism”, but the text says indeed, by order of frequency, “communism”, “nazism”, “totalitarism”, “stalinism”, “fascism”, “racism”,”xenofobia” and “neo-fascism”).
 
Last edited:
Dear Onychorhynchus coronatus,

Let me start at the last point discussed, the Franco regime. And let me say that probably nor you nor myself are in the best position to discuss that. I do not know your age, but guess that perhaps you are born after Franco death (1975) and ever after arrival of democracy to Spain (1978). If so, nor you nor myself know the Franco regime from our own experiences, but from outside references. Yours, seemingly, are the reading of history books and some visits to Spain, and maybe some talks with friends. Mine are besides my whole life in Spain, many talks with my parents, who, by the way, advice me against the books and films dealing with this period of Spanish history, as they present a false view of the subject, those due to authors from the left as well as those due to authors from the right. Of course, my parents, and specially my father, have read a lot of such books and seen a lot of such films as to be able to compare them with their experiences.

After discussing the subject with him, I see that all countries have periods of their history that are not a source of pride for their people, rather the opposite. And I see also that is quite diffucult to rate any government from any country or from any time as the best or the worst in history. And that for several reasons, being the main one the unavoidable lean to apply our today values and ideas to times and societies which had values and ideas very different. It is very easy today to blame the Inquisition at Middle Ages, the witch burning at seventeenth century or the slave trade at eighteen century, but at these times these actions were “politically correct”, and often was the society and not the the civil or the church authorities who claimed for applying measures which are unacceptable today.

As for the Franco regime, as for all the past or present regimes, we cannot say that it was completely bad nor completely good. It was mixed. Hitler regime did some good things besides many evil ones, and the same can be said of the regimes of Stalin, Mussolini or Kim-Il-Sung (this last regime, by the way, still alive). Discussing it on depth cannot be done here, nor cannot be judged now as one unique thing. It was not the same at the beginning, along the Civil War, along the postwar, the difficult times of the forties, along the fifties, when Spain entered the UNO and the ambassadors returned to Spain, or along the sixties, when the country approached more and more the values of the other European countries. Thus, I will not enter to discuss that subject. Let me say only that my parents families (parents, grandparents and grandgrandparents ) count several victims killed either by one or by the other side, and the same happens in the families of their friends. And, had I time or space, I would be able to supply you at least as many instances of evil behaviour from the Spanish left as you can supply me from Spanish right, and getting back along time, surely many more.

Second point: the current government of Spain. Well, after being informed myself better, I cannot say that it is the worst government in Spanish history, as our country has suffered much worse rulers even in the twentieth century. The reign of Ferdinand VII was worth of blame and that of Charles II was much worse. And today other countries have regimes underscoring the Spanish one by a long way. I cannot discuss this point openly, and besides that it would take too much space. But let me address only the subject of corruption, which is the main subject of this thread. Well, Spain has a lot of corrupt people as probaby have many other countries, and many of them are found among the politics from all political parties, but the damage done to the country because of corruption of important members at the current government surpasses all the levels known in Spain since the beginning of democracy. Even corruption at Franco times was milder, because then there were only a few persons getting money this way, and now there are thousands or even tens of thousands. But there is a way to clarify this point: Transparency International mantains a page with the ranking of Corruption Index for 179 countries. For 2020, Spain is not included among the top ten, nor even among the top hundred countries. She has the 147th place on the ranking, 32 places above New Zealand, the country with the least corruption index. However it should be mentioned that already on the first year of today’s Spanish government (2020) the index increased two points against that of 2019.

By lack of space and time I cannot discuss no more the subject of your hate of religion. But of course I disagree from your viewpoint. Catholic Church, and many other confessions, are to be ashamed of their activities in the past, but now the times of intolerance have been left for the history, for some communist countries and for some fundamentalist islamic confessions. However the Church should apologize for past evils. Indeed, the Pope John Paul II did so, recognizing the past errors and apologizing for these. But do not forget that today and always, this Church have members who had been notable for the charity job they had done, even some that received the Peace Nobel Price for that. Still the Christians belong to the faith with most victims of war or persecution, over 200 million right now. The atrocities made to arab christians by the Islamic State in Syria and Irak are not so far in time and similar ones are on the way in several countries of Asia, Africa and America.

And finally, let me comment shortly your qualification of “fascist” to me, or my qualification of “communist” to you. Of course, this is nonsense. These words should be never used to insult or disqualify the opponent. For either he is indeed a “fascist” or a “communist”, or is not. In the first case he will take the insult as a source of pride, because he or she feels him- or herself deserving these words and is glad of them, thus these are not insulting. And if is not, then the words are not deserved and the insulting part is wrong. I think that this is the case among us and that we not deserve these words. Thus, by my side I withdraw that qualification.

I finish remembering the past declaration of the European Parlament, published the 19th September 2019 with the title Importance of European Historic Memory for the Future of Europe, where “fascism” and “communism” are equaled and condemned together (as expected, to disengage from the condemn, communists have read “fascism” and “stalinism”, but the text says indeed, by order of frequency, “communism”, “nazism”, “totalitarism”, “stalinism”, “fascism”, “racism”,”xenofobia” and “neo-fascism”).

Well my information about the Spanish civil war does partly come from reading several books on the topic both non-fiction and fiction ("For whom the bell tolls" by Hemmingway is my favourite novel) and I actually don't see any problem with that at all really because if you do not read about history then how are you supposed to learn anything at all?

There are plenty of books that deal openly and objectively with the subject and do not stray into partisanship or spare the Spanish Republic any criticism where it deserves it, I've read a couple like John Preston's "Spanish Civil War: Reaction, Revolution and Revenge" and "The Spanish Civil War" by Hugh Thomas that are very good accounts.

One might argue that even Ernest Hemmingway's "For Whom the Bell Tolls" and George Orwell's "Homage to Catalonia" do not spare the Stalinists and anarchists who co-opted and sabotaged the movements and in fact are scathing of these.

There are great documentaries about the topic too that interview survivors of all political sides and opinions like this great old British series (which I highly reccommend that you watch) :


However it also comes from having lived and travelled widely in Spain (visiting many of the old bunkers and trenches and battle sites) and worked with conservation in rural areas which were major battlegrounds of the war (like the Sierra de Guadarrama) where I would find old bullet casings and grenade fragments in streams for example (and while I was in Spain they were still finding mass graves of victims of Franco and reporting them in the news).

Moreover it also comes from having spoken to people who lived during the aftermath of the war (unfortunately I have never had the honour of speaking to someone who fought for the Republicans during the war) and just with ordinary Spaniards about their opinions and views about this period of Spanish history (though obviously this is not a subject that many want to discuss).

Furthermore, as you probably already know a lot of Spaniards who were fleeing fascist takeover of Spain fled to Latin America (it was either that or be rounded up by Franco and killed or put in labour / concentration camps) and I knew the descendents of these in Mexico and still meet them here in Brazil which has one of the biggest Spanish diasporas in the world. In fact my significant other is a Brazilian of Spanish heritage and a great grandfather on her father's side came as a refugee from Spain during this period.
 
Last edited:
That was the best government in the recent history of my country, obviously. Not sure what you mean about exercising more doubt/critical thinking, really not much of that is needed for realize that now we are in the worst level of corruption (and worst things than corruption) in the whole history of Spain, is far enough with be aware of some of the countless atrocities our current government is keeping doing.

As for the Franco regime, as for all the past or present regimes, we cannot say that it was completely bad nor completely good. It was mixed. Hitler regime did some good things besides many evil ones, and the same can be said of the regimes of Stalin, Mussolini or Kim-Il-Sung (this last regime, by the way, still alive).

While I do not know enough on Franco to be able to contradict you, your points about Stalin and Hitler are at best clumsy, at worst openly ignoring multiple genocides and atrocities.

Upthread, you say that Franco's government is 'the best government in the recent history of my country'. Last I checked neither of Suarez or Zapatero's governments killed over 150,000 of its own people.

As for Hitler and Stalin, your assertion that they were neither 'completely bad nor completely good' is shocking. Yes, Stalin's Five Year Plans and Collectivisation resulted in quick industrialization, but at what cost? 20 million lives, of whom 7 million died of starvation as a direct result of his decision to continue pushing Ukraine and the Kuban region for grain when there was none. Does that sound like good leadership to you?

Another of the leaders you cite, Adolf Hitler, directly caused the deaths of over 8 million of his own people and 50 million more across the globe as a result of his policies and the resulting war. So what do you mean when you say that these regimes were 'mixed'? I'd love to give you the benefit of the doubt but even comparing the current Spanish government to any of these regimes is appalling.
 
Dear Onychorhynchus coronatus,

Let me start at the last point discussed, the Franco regime. And let me say that probably nor you nor myself are in the best position to discuss that. I do not know your age, but guess that perhaps you are born after Franco death (1975) and ever after arrival of democracy to Spain (1978). If so, nor you nor myself know the Franco regime from our own experiences, but from outside references. Yours, seemingly, are the reading of history books and some visits to Spain, and maybe some talks with friends. Mine are besides my whole life in Spain, many talks with my parents, who, by the way, advice me against the books and films dealing with this period of Spanish history, as they present a false view of the subject, those due to authors from the left as well as those due to authors from the right. Of course, my parents, and specially my father, have read a lot of such books and seen a lot of such films as to be able to compare them with their experiences.

After discussing the subject with him, I see that all countries have periods of their history that are not a source of pride for their people, rather the opposite. And I see also that is quite diffucult to rate any government from any country or from any time as the best or the worst in history. And that for several reasons, being the main one the unavoidable lean to apply our today values and ideas to times and societies which had values and ideas very different. It is very easy today to blame the Inquisition at Middle Ages, the witch burning at seventeenth century or the slave trade at eighteen century, but at these times these actions were “politically correct”, and often was the society and not the the civil or the church authorities who claimed for applying measures which are unacceptable today.

As for the Franco regime, as for all the past or present regimes, we cannot say that it was completely bad nor completely good. It was mixed. Hitler regime did some good things besides many evil ones, and the same can be said of the regimes of Stalin, Mussolini or Kim-Il-Sung (this last regime, by the way, still alive). Discussing it on depth cannot be done here, nor cannot be judged now as one unique thing. It was not the same at the beginning, along the Civil War, along the postwar, the difficult times of the forties, along the fifties, when Spain entered the UNO and the ambassadors returned to Spain, or along the sixties, when the country approached more and more the values of the other European countries. Thus, I will not enter to discuss that subject. Let me say only that my parents families (parents, grandparents and grandgrandparents ) count several victims killed either by one or by the other side, and the same happens in the families of their friends. And, had I time or space, I would be able to supply you at least as many instances of evil behaviour from the Spanish left as you can supply me from Spanish right, and getting back along time, surely many more.

Second point: the current government of Spain. Well, after being informed myself better, I cannot say that it is the worst government in Spanish history, as our country has suffered much worse rulers even in the twentieth century. The reign of Ferdinand VII was worth of blame and that of Charles II was much worse. And today other countries have regimes underscoring the Spanish one by a long way. I cannot discuss this point openly, and besides that it would take too much space. But let me address only the subject of corruption, which is the main subject of this thread. Well, Spain has a lot of corrupt people as probaby have many other countries, and many of them are found among the politics from all political parties, but the damage done to the country because of corruption of important members at the current government surpasses all the levels known in Spain since the beginning of democracy. Even corruption at Franco times was milder, because then there were only a few persons getting money this way, and now there are thousands or even tens of thousands. But there is a way to clarify this point: Transparency International mantains a page with the ranking of Corruption Index for 179 countries. For 2020, Spain is not included among the top ten, nor even among the top hundred countries. She has the 147th place on the ranking, 32 places above New Zealand, the country with the least corruption index. However it should be mentioned that already on the first year of today’s Spanish government (2020) the index increased two points against that of 2019.

By lack of space and time I cannot discuss no more the subject of your hate of religion. But of course I disagree from your viewpoint. Catholic Church, and many other confessions, are to be ashamed of their activities in the past, but now the times of intolerance have been left for the history, for some communist countries and for some fundamentalist islamic confessions. However the Church should apologize for past evils. Indeed, the Pope John Paul II did so, recognizing the past errors and apologizing for these. But do not forget that today and always, this Church have members who had been notable for the charity job they had done, even some that received the Peace Nobel Price for that. Still the Christians belong to the faith with most victims of war or persecution, over 200 million right now. The atrocities made to arab christians by the Islamic State in Syria and Irak are not so far in time and similar ones are on the way in several countries of Asia, Africa and America.

And finally, let me comment shortly your qualification of “fascist” to me, or my qualification of “communist” to you. Of course, this is nonsense. These words should be never used to insult or disqualify the opponent. For either he is indeed a “fascist” or a “communist”, or is not. In the first case he will take the insult as a source of pride, because he or she feels him- or herself deserving these words and is glad of them, thus these are not insulting. And if is not, then the words are not deserved and the insulting part is wrong. I think that this is the case among us and that we not deserve these words. Thus, by my side I withdraw that qualification.

I finish remembering the past declaration of the European Parlament, published the 19th September 2019 with the title Importance of European Historic Memory for the Future of Europe, where “fascism” and “communism” are equaled and condemned together (as expected, to disengage from the condemn, communists have read “fascism” and “stalinism”, but the text says indeed, by order of frequency, “communism”, “nazism”, “totalitarism”, “stalinism”, “fascism”, “racism”,”xenofobia” and “neo-fascism”).

@amur leopard with his excellent comment has pretty much taken the words out of my mouth and succintly summed up my own views towards your comments on totalitarianism and moral equivalency and corruption so I won't comment on that.

But I will comment on what you have said about religion and just say that it is true I am not fond of religion (though I'm not fanatical about that) and as an atheist / humanist I am a very firm believer in the importance of secularism when it comes to religion within politics.

I think you have changed your tune quite a lot from your first comment but I agree on the need to debate respectfully and not resort to qualifications of "fascist" or "communist".
 
Back
Top