Overall, I've found photography neither easier nor more difficult - just a bit different - in each of the two collections I've visited so far (two visits to each since reopening, in varied weather conditions).
Whipsnade, with its masses of space, felt little different from normal. I noticed one or two one-way sections; the one on the path between the bears and wolverine did mean a long trip round the block if you wanted to revisit those exhibits. Not a big problem for me -- although it could well be so for those with limited mobility. Many people were either wilfully ignoring the signs, or just not noticing them (

- easily done if there's a distracting bear splashing around in the pool at the time

). Not a huge problem at the less busy times, as it's quite a wide path there (I think they tried to have staff on hand at the busier times to guide people), but I tended to avoid the one-way sections if they looked very congested.
Hamerton, being compact enough overall, and being more a linked succession of small one-way loops, was no problem at all. The system still allows for a certain amount of flitting back and forth between favourite exhibits without having to negotiate a huge loop each time. One of the benefits of visiting smaller (in area) collections. Aside from Whipsnade, my instinct is to not visit any of the major collections at the present time, and maybe not until restrictions are further eased, or more likely until the mid/low season, when visitor numbers will naturally drop off. To be honest, I tend to visit mainly out of season anyway - and I appreciate that I'm lucky to have the freedom to be able to do just that.
Whilst on the subject of enforced one-way systems; at least twice during my last two Hamerton visits, I've come across some really interesting behaviour, or an unusual composition opportunity (and got some pretty good photos as a result), precisely
because I'd had to go around the longer way. I definitely would not have enjoyed observing that behaviour -- nor have got those shots -- if I was just focussing (excuse the pun) on the shortest distance between a couple of exhibits.
I suspect my approach to zoo photography may be different to some, in that -- when visiting purely for my own pleasure -- I rarely say "I'm going to visit collection X to get a photo of Y (exhibiting behaviour Z)" or similar. I feel that would be the surest way of setting myself up for disappointment, particularly in the current situation. My mindset is almost always "I'm going to collection X, and let's see what photos I can get" ... and then just see what happens. It doesn't bother me that I might've already photographed a species, or even an individual, tens or even hundreds of times before. I don't get any pleasure from effectively ticking things off a list (which bemuses some of my birdwatching companions), but I do get a huge kick out of trying to improve on those photos I've captured previously. If, along the way, I also happen to get a good view or photo of whatever the current latest honeypot attraction might be, then I'll consider that a bonus, nothing more.
Anyway, that's just the way that I operate; I'm certainly not saying it's the
right way for others - it just suits
me.
yet another cloudy day today with the threat of rain at the destinations I'd booked to go to
The weather doesn't usually worry me too much, unless it's driving horizontal rain, or oppressive heat. With full-on sunshine creating at least as many problems as it solves, photographically speaking, I'm also usually happy to see at least a
few clouds in the forecast. Some of my favourite photos have been taken in the rain, as it will often elicit some interesting behaviours, and can bring a different dimension to certain subjects (eg. closeups of fur and feather etc.). I'm lucky, in that my camera gear is largely weather-sealed, so I can usually continue shooting without much issue; although the lens front element and viewfinder still need to be wiped down or protected of course.
having to wipe rain drops off my glasses or condensation from my camera.
I have to agree that wearing glasses can be bothersome occasionally when trying to continue photography in the rain - I really must get a hat. (side note: I find Hamerton is great in the rain, as so much is viewable from the covered walkways. If you're not too choosy about your subjects, you can often just carry on photographing there as normal, without having to wipe everything down before each shot).
when I visited Dudley I was given a free return ticket as it was raining
I've been caught in a blizzard before and never got a free ticket then...
I'm certain I'm very much in the minority here, but, as a photographer wanting a range of interesting images, I will often seek out rainy days to visit. And blizzards? I'd willingly pay double if my visit included a guaranteed blizzard thrown in! Fantastic!
the first complaint since we re-opened on 15th June. We want our money back, because of the all the pens were empty, and not even the lions were visible...
Classic! On that basis I reckon I must be owed at least a grand by now.

Pesky lions.
