Samueltiger
Well-Known Member
How would you improve the Los Angeles Zoo in your own way
Very nice and yes I would prefer a larger children's zoo over a California area tbh it could be a nature lands area to teach guests about our planet while having ecosystems likeI would like to see the following changes:
I believe all these things should be done before proceeding with the master plan. I also don't think the Children's Zoo should be replaced by a new California area. That area has always been for kids and the zoo spent over $3 million in 2001 to redesign it. It is beautifully landscaped and could be fantastic again with some investment.
- Lengthen the operating hours in the summer from 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.
- Ensure that the animals are in their exhibits during zoo hours
- Refurbish and populate all empty exhibits
- Reinvest into the Children's Zoo and refurbish cave to include cave-dwelling species (e.g. bats)
- Reduce food and gift shop prices
- Reintroduce key animals back into the zoo -- lions, bears, hippos, etc.
- Redesign zoo map to include more detail and be more aesthetically pleasing
- Add air conditioning to the Desert LAIR -- it is uncomfortably hot and stifling
- Enable viewing of the California condors
- Add a mid-afternoon time for the World of Birds Show
- Reduce the tram price by half after 1 p.m.
- Double the size of the giraffe yard
- Design a free-flight aviary for the Steller's sea eagles
- Add koalas to the Australia house (formerly the Koala House)
- Replace all glass viewing windows that are too grimy to see the animals well (i.e. orangutans)
- Focus on the animals instead of so many adult-oriented evening events featuring alcohol
Thanks this thread has been on my mind@Samueltiger , this is a great thread you have started. I wish the zoo would listen to what regular visitors want instead of some planning commission. By the time I found out about the master plan it was too late to make any comments. I read the report and don't like the new visitor pathway that is being planned -- it appears sunken in and that people will be walking at a lower level than the rest of the zoo. I like to look out at the horizon and not see things from a vantage point that blocks my view. Also, I think it's a total waste of money to redesign the entrance in order to level the elevation gain. The plan calls for eliminating the stairs and accessible ramps at the entrance so that everyone will walk on the same path in some ill-advised idea of equality. I like having the option of both -- when I have more time I take the ramps so I can look at the native garden and birds at the feeders and when I'm in a hurry I prefer to go up the stairs. Lot of visitor attractions have both stairs and/or ramps or elevators at the entrance (e.g. the Getty) and I don't think anyone is bothered by this or feels left out. Why does everyone have to enter the same way? What a bottleneck that will be!
Speaking as a disabled person who listens to mobility aid users, as long as the ramps are in the front of the building/area and not through a different entrance then the rest of the public, that's grand@Samueltiger , this is a great thread you have started. I wish the zooA would listen to what regular visitors want instead of some planning commission. By the time I found out about the master plan it was too late to make any comments. I read the report and don't like the new visitor pathway that is being planned -- it appears sunken in and that people will be walking at a lower level than the rest of the zoo. I like to look out at the horizon and not see things from a vantage point that blocks my view. Also, I think it's a total waste of money to redesign the entrance in order to level the elevation gain. The plan calls for eliminating the stairs and accessible ramps at the entrance so that everyone will walk on the same path in some ill-advised idea of equality. I like having the option of both -- when I have more time I take the ramps so I can look at the native garden and birds at the feeders and when I'm in a hurry I prefer to go up the stairs. Lot of visitor attractions have both stairs and/or ramps or elevators at the entrance (e.g. the Getty) and I don't think anyone is bothered by this or feels left out. Why does everyone have to enter the same way? What a bottleneck that will be!
@nationalzoolover -- Yes, the ramps are in the front central section of the Entrance Plaza just to the right of the stairs. Visitors have the option of going up the steps, which are separated into three tiers, or walking up the ramps immediately to the right. The ramps wind through a lovely native garden with a waterfall, trees, and several bird feeders. While people with mobility issues often use the ramps, they are also heavily used by families with strollers. I usually choose the ramps so I can look at the birds and plants. The Entrance Plaza was opened in 2005 at a cost of over $20 million, which included the Sea Life Cliffs exhibit and Children's Discovery Center. The Discovery Center featured the California Condor Rescue Zone, which was closed during the pandemic and never reopened. In my opinion, the Entrance Plaza is one of the best improvements the zoo has ever made and there is no reason to alter it.Speaking as a disabled person who listens to mobility aid users, as long as the ramps are in the front of the building/area and not through a different entrance then the rest of the public, that's grand
That's never going to happen, and for good reason. There are a variety of arguments for why this is a horrible idea, the chief of those being that it is so much better for animal welfare to allow animals the choice of being off-exhibit.Ensure that the animals are in their exhibits during zoo hours
Reduce food and gift shop prices
Again, this not going to happen. Prices in good zoos are the way the way they are because zoos need the money. It's not like you're going to a restaurant that charges you ridiculously high prices because they're fancy. Every penny charged is spent supporting the zoo's conservation-driven mission.Reduce the tram price by half after 1 p.m.
Well if it's a room themed like a desert ecosystem, then it makes perfect sense for it to be hot and I don't know why that would even be a complaint.Add air conditioning to the Desert LAIR -- it is uncomfortably hot and stifling
This is another thing that's never going to happen. Suggesting a decreased focus on evening events for adults shows a complete lack of understanding about zoo finances and how zoos both interact with and engage their community.Focus on the animals instead of so many adult-oriented evening events featuring alcohol
Well if it's a room themed like a desert ecosystem, then it makes perfect sense for it to be hot and I don't know why that would even be a complaint.
I would like to see the following changes:
I believe all these things should be done before proceeding with the master plan. I also don't think the Children's Zoo should be replaced by a new California area. That area has always been for kids and the zoo spent over $3 million in 2001 to redesign it. It is beautifully landscaped and could be fantastic again with some investment.
- Lengthen the operating hours in the summer from 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.
- Ensure that the animals are in their exhibits during zoo hours
- Refurbish and populate all empty exhibits
- Reinvest into the Children's Zoo and refurbish cave to include cave-dwelling species (e.g. bats)
- Reduce food and gift shop prices
- Reintroduce key animals back into the zoo -- lions, bears, hippos, etc.
- Redesign zoo map to include more detail and be more aesthetically pleasing
- Add air conditioning to the Desert LAIR -- it is uncomfortably hot and stifling
- Enable viewing of the California condors
- Add a mid-afternoon time for the World of Birds Show
- Reduce the tram price by half after 1 p.m.
- Double the size of the giraffe yard
- Design a free-flight aviary for the Steller's sea eagles
- Add koalas to the Australia house (formerly the Koala House)
- Replace all glass viewing windows that are too grimy to see the animals well (i.e. orangutans)
- Focus on the animals instead of so many adult-oriented evening events featuring alcohol
The California Living Museum (CALM Zoo) in Bakersfield is dedicated exclusively to the state's native wildlife and plants. The smaller Orange County Zoo also focuses on southwestern flora and fauna.While I can see the appeal (today was my first time visiting in over 15 years) of maintaining the Children's Zoo, I do think retheming it to showcase California's wildlife is a good idea. I've had memberships to the San Diego, San Diego Safari, and the Living Desert zoos and none of these zoos have an exhibit area focused specifically on the state's native wildlife.
Sure there's Oakland Zoo's California Trail and San Diego Zoo's Elephant Odyssey is comparable, but in my opinion there isn't a zoo in Southern California that has a space showcasing the local flora and fauna yet.
The California Living Museum (CALM Zoo) in Bakersfield is dedicated exclusively to the state's native wildlife and plants. The smaller Orange County Zoo also focuses on southwestern flora and fauna.
I'm not opposed to the L.A. Zoo having a California section, but I am against it replacing the Children's Zoo. Now that the zoo has closed the goat and sheep contact yard, the closest zoo for children to interact with farm animals is about an hour away in Santa Ana. Incidentally, there used to be a petting zoo elsewhere in Griffith Park, but it was shut down by the City Council due to animal rights activists. Since the zoo has been slowly closing exhibits in the Children's Zoo over the last few years, there has been a loss of a dozen species with no signs of replacement. At this point it's also unlikely that the zoo's master plan for the California section will be realized because the zoo is currently being sued by the Friends of Griffith Park over the expansion plans. The zoo's plan involves removing oaks and chaparral in the park, which would destroy the habitat for native wildlife. If you're interested in seeing some native Southern California animals the next time you visit Los Angeles, I recommend taking a few hours just to explore Griffith Park itself, which lies in the easternmost remnant of the Santa Monica Mountains. I routinely see mule deer, coyotes, other small mammals, and a plethora of birds (especially in the adjacent L.A. River), including Canada geese, mallards, grebes, raptors, herons, ibises, egrets, black-necked stilts, woodpeckers, and a variety of songbirds.
If you're interested in seeing some native Southern California animals the next time you visit Los Angeles, I recommend taking a few hours just to explore Griffith Park itself, which lies in the easternmost remnant of the Santa Monica Mountains. I routinely see mule deer, coyotes, other small mammals, and a plethora of birds (especially in the adjacent L.A. River), including Canada geese, mallards, grebes, raptors, herons, ibises, egrets, black-necked stilts, woodpeckers, and a variety of songbirds.
I've seen the deer in multiple places around dusk in Griffith Park along Zoo Drive and at the Bird Sanctuary. Forest Lawn Cemetery is also adjacent to the park and deer frequently come down from the hills to eat the flowers! Down the road from the zoo is a golf course where I've seen multiple coyotes. I even saw one using the crosswalk connecting the upper and lower ends of the course that golf carts drive through! Last month there was a large coyote lounging on the greens while people were playing. It was the biggest coyote I ever saw and I had to do a double take to make sure it wasn't a wolf!What times of day / locations within the park do you recommend checking out in order to see the deer, coyotes, and other mammals?
These are all great ideas, @peruvianbirdie -- fixing up the empty exhibits is exactly what the L.A. Zoo should be doing considering the City's budget crisis.I know it’s been awhile since anyone has posted on this thread, with the current state of the zoo, I was kind of hoping to bring this thread back to life and share my ideas. (Might be long so bear with me plz!)
Note these are the exhibits that I know of that are no longer in use:
I am shifting my focus on the zoo’s current empty exhibits and trying to find suitable/reasonable animals that might fit and be crowd drawers.
Let’s start off with the former pinniped exhibit by the LAIR: As much as I would love African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) to be implemented in this exhibit (especially that they’re part of the master plan), this would mean the exhibit would have to have a renovated holding area and filtration which can be expensive. I feel like adding North American River Otters (Lontra canadensis) or Asian Small-Clawed Otters (Aonyx cinereus) might be a more reasonable option, plus they are charismatic and beloved by zoo visitors.
Ranger’s former exhibit: Admittedly seen as outdated for bears I’m thinking maybe Coyotes (Canis latrans) or the current Grey Wolves (Canis lupus) supposedly BTS. I honestly consider Dall Sheep (Ovis dalli) due to the cave/mountain work in the exhibit, though they aren’t that charismatic to general zoo visitors and the zoo already has a fair collection of rare ungulates.
Lion exhibit: Now this one is tricky because I think animals medium to small size are the most suitable such as:
-Crested Porcupine (Hystrix cristata)/ Cape Porcupine (Hystrix africaeaustralis)
-Aardvark
-Warthog
-Small ungulate or small primate
However my main concern is the moat (if an animal falls in) and a small species may be difficult to spot based on how far the land is from the moat/viewing area, this is why maybe something small like hyraxes and mongoose might not work.
But if the zoo is able create an area on the bottom of the moat and allow animals to go up and down I feel like it can make a decent Cheetah or Hyena exhibit.
And last but not least Elephants of Asia: Very recent (just yesterday!), I am still holding hope and believe Asian elephants will make a return so for that I wouldn’t want the complex to go through drastic changes. The obvious answer might be to move Marshall the Greater One-Horned Rhino there, though he is still young and not at breeding age yet. Some like me have also been wanting a bigger area for the Masai Giraffes, but then it does ruin the Asian theme. I’ll leave the speculation and choice to you all, I’m curious of your picks.
Another thing I would like the zoo to add is BTS/Animal Experiences and animals I feel would fit are:
This can bring more finance and give visitors an inside look and experience of the zoo hopefully bringing in more positive PR in LA. I remember when the zoo used to have a guest experience with hippos.
- Greater One-Horned Rhino
- Masai Giraffes
- Giant River Otters
- Sumatran Tiger/Jaguar/Snow Leopard
- California Condor
- Flamingos
- Aldabra Tortoise