johnstoni
Well-Known Member
I am surprised people think it appropriate to address Pertinax like that - I have never seen him write a post in the tone some are addressing him.
Statistically, using ISIS as a guide, it doesn't look good for many of the species attempted at HWP in the last couple of years.
People get very defensive when people discuss zoo deaths, as if the speculation gets in the way of some perfectly good reason for all the losses. If, just imagine, someone who had contacted HWP (and been given an answer) decided to post the information on here, would they be doing the park any favours? I think it would likely just trigger many posts about whether the park should continue with the species. We have already been told there was a ragwort infestation, I don't think this information leading to a wider discussion on the limitations of ungulate husbandry in a collection based in the Scottish highlands is a particularly bad use of Zoochat.
Statistically, using ISIS as a guide, it doesn't look good for many of the species attempted at HWP in the last couple of years.
People get very defensive when people discuss zoo deaths, as if the speculation gets in the way of some perfectly good reason for all the losses. If, just imagine, someone who had contacted HWP (and been given an answer) decided to post the information on here, would they be doing the park any favours? I think it would likely just trigger many posts about whether the park should continue with the species. We have already been told there was a ragwort infestation, I don't think this information leading to a wider discussion on the limitations of ungulate husbandry in a collection based in the Scottish highlands is a particularly bad use of Zoochat.