Am I the only person who *likes* that aviary?![]()
I like it.
Am I the only person who *likes* that aviary?![]()
After decades of use it surely isn't beyond the wit of man to design glass-fronted enclosures which give you a view of the animals rather than of your own reflection.
1. Tone down the commercialism (no, I don't want a photograph taken of me ...)
2. Build enclosures where the public can actually see the animals (i.e. don't block viewing areas with extraneous stuff; don't put viewing areas at dead ends - e.g. gharial)
3. After decades of use it surely isn't beyond the wit of man to design glass-fronted enclosures which give you a view of the animals rather than of your own reflection ...
4. More species. More, more ...
5. Treasure your history
First idea I agree with the second I do not I wouldn't keep anything on that island in honesty you can barely see a thing on it.Looking at some of your guys ideas, I noticed that a demolished Buffalo house could be a good place for Pygmy Hippos. Maybe even Lemur Island.
Where can I find the zone map?That area will be part of the forest zone, so who knows
That area will be part of the forest zone, so who knows
Actually, there is just such a map in the planning documents for Madagascar Phase 2. It is labelled '2030 Vision' and it shows the zones as described above: note that the Forest Zone includes the Heart of Africa site (behind the Tropical House etc) and the west zoo from the Elephant House to Miniature Monkeys and the Bat Cave.Paleomatt there isn't a zonal map. At the moment it is just proposals. Islands zone is where Islands is. grasslands zone will be most of the current west zoo. Forest zone will be most of east zoo.and Conservation in Action zone (i.e the bits that do not fit anywjere else)will be the round enclosure and adjacent exhibits, plus a new developemnt across the road from Spirit of the Jaguar.
Also proposed is a wetlands zone to the north of the elephants. All this work will take 20-30 years to complete, and the plans will probably change many times within that timeframe.
The point here was not glass or not glass but where glass is used it should be non-reflective. I suspect the glass makers make non-reflective glass. Glass can be angled to cut down reflections but then people tend to bang their heads if it leans towards the viewer. Best solution seems to be shielding it above and behind the viewer.I also think glass is a main issue with many zoo's but those that have tried in the past then had the problem of keeping them clean.