India's Richest Family Building World's Largest Zoo

I actually think Forrest is a good Conservationist he is one of the people who started my passion for conservation and I also think the Thylacine is alive and I love watching his backyard Zoo videos:)
Sorry for the honesty but someone that claims that guy to be a good conservationist does not know anything about conservation and wildlife. Being a conservationist is not synonymous with appearing on TV. It is an actual job, based on research and evidence and most importantly, respect for the animal's space, welfare and safety. And what do visits to backyard zoos have to do with wildlife conservation? The internet is full of idiots with exotic pets who do not understand a peanut of animal biology, behaviour or welfare. However, they portray themselves as animal lovers, rescuers, and conservationists while hugging their pet crocodile or serval as if it was a dog or a cat. Not all animals consider physical touch or manipulation as an act of care or love.
 
There is so much wrong with this video and I didn’t even get to complete it. As someone who works in the veterinary field as a tech, seeing that Jaguar cub with severe hip dysplasia really upsets me. The vet speaks of the uncertainty of their future and mentioning how she’s on multiple medications. She’s only going to get larger as she grows up and worsening her condition. Any good vet would want nothing more than to be the advocate for their patients. That means knowing when it’s time to end their suffering. No patient should live their final moments in misery if we can help it. Much of what is going on is wishful thinking/denial in this video.

And yet again, the need to dance around calling this place a rich man’s zoo is very clear. Forrest’s description says “To be clear, this is not a zoo.”. Oh really? You could’ve fooled me ;) Well the collection, their method of acquiring new animals, and exhibition style of these animals says otherwise. Others have pointed it out, this is Ambani doing some major greenwashing but social media is quick to consume this without needing to thinking about it.
Ambani says in an earlier video that he is not building a praani sangrahaalaya, but a praani sevalaya (praani means animal)

'Sangrahalaya' means a collection of, or a place where a collection of something is kept.
'Sevalaya' means a place where one is served, or taken care of.
So according to him the facility has been built to serve and take care of animals

I don't mean to condemn or have a take on anybody's statements or opinions, I just stated the nature of the 'zoo' according to the man who built it.
 
Ambani says in an earlier video that he is not building a praani sangrahaalaya, but a praani sevalaya (praani means animal)

'Sangrahalaya' means a collection of, or a place where a collection of something is kept.
'Sevalaya' means a place where one is served, or taken care of.
So according to him the facility has been built to serve and take care of animals

I don't mean to condemn or have a take on anybody's statements or opinions, I just stated the nature of the 'zoo' according to the man who built it.

Well the man who built it is refusing to be transparent and chooses to do things his way instead of getting consultation with professionals in the zoo and conservation community/industry, so it is fair for people to not take his word seriously.

Honestly his statement reminds me of the crazy stories and “theories” I have thought of about zoos. I have thought of fantasy worlds where kingdoms race to build the biggest or best zoos out there, basing their decisions over animals instead of gold and stuff. I have thought of zoos and menageries being built because of a subconscious desire to return to Eden (as an agnostic I say that it may or may not exist) and therefore could be considered as a spiritual building in addition to a scientific or cultural institution. I of course never brought them up before because for the former I can’t come up with a good story for it and the latter may as well be gobbledygook. I would be rightfully ridiculed for such opinions especially when I don’t have anything to back myself up.

Which is why I was surprised to see such explanation from Ambani. I never thought anyone would say something so brazenly about their zoo, let alone one that is muddied with shady dealings, out loud. Does Anant Ambani really think that he is serving his acquisitions like idols of gods in a temple?
 
The more I've read and looked into this place, the more concerning it is becoming. Firstly suspicious animal imports, then threatening to sue reporters who go against their image, and its coupled with keeping some animals of even more dubious origins.

Spix Macaws, Snow leopards, congolese chimpanzees, mandrills, apparently eastern gorillas and Tapanuli orangutans... The list seems to go on and on.

Honestly, while I do not doubt the animals on display are being cared for adequately (one would hope so with the amount of money allegedly pouring into this menagerie, because that's what it really is), the sheer number of imports does lead one to believe this may well be darker behind the scenes and a hub for wildlife smuggling as well. That plus they're doing breeding, which when considering they're keeping a pretty sizeable amount of white tigers and lions which have been shown to have cubs does make one worry if they're intentionally inbreeding animals as well.

I also have noted most the publicity goes into promoting the larger animals, as expected, but considering the scope of this place I wouldn't be surprised if they also have large amounts of other questionably sourced oddities such as herps or birds, which I would worry may not be given as much care. I've seen a few displayed on their Instagram, but don't know enough about what reptiles are circulating on the market to tell if what they have in that field brings up red flags.

(Quick edit: apparently looking on their Instagram, they've acquired Galapagos land Iguanas, which definitely points to foul play. Does anyone know where they might've come from?)

A shame such funds are going into a menagerie to promote the ambanis as caring for the environment instead of a genuine zoological facility or other conservation project.
 
The zoo obtained around 2.000 reptiles from Austria. According to newspapers, 1.800 of theme were from the Reptile Zoo Forchtenstein including two albino alligators, five inland taipans, four Eastern diamondback rattlesnake, six Reticulated python and 27 Green anacondas.
 
More on the Ambani's trying to shut down investigations into Vantara:

Statement on Vantara’s failed legal case against Himal Southasian
Ambani family under fire over sprawling Indian wildlife park (this one''s behind a paywall, would anyone know how to read it for free?)

If you look up "paywall remover" you will find some sites, though I'm not sure if I can publicly say what they are.

Seems like it's just a general article going over several issues including the information posted by @remar above.
 
There's been a new article in czech saying that the current biggest exporter to Vantara based in EU is Jindřich Blahož, the current director of the small private Zoo Sedlec. He's sent almost 6000 reptiles there. Also over 20 sloths, 5 carnivorans (don't know which species exactly), over 400 kangaroos, 217 primates and many more. It seems like czech authorities are currently getting more curious about Vantara and that they find it somehow suspicious.
source
 
Here is google translation of the article. (it also mentions that Vantara is now EARAZA member).

Linie Praha – ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Vantara: Critically endangered species and hundreds of kangaroos are heading to an Indian facility. What is their fate?

Thousands of reptiles, 441 kangaroos, 217 primates, 138 llamas or 68 deer. Such animals traveled from the Czech Republic to the private Indian facility Vantara. Radiožurnál found out that in just a few months, the Czech breeder and businessman became the most active exporter to this park in all of Europe.
But Vantara is not an ordinary zoo, as we know it from the Western world. It is owned by the son of the richest Asian. The company stated on its website that 150 thousand specimens have already passed through its gates, although the facility is not open to the public. Foreign media are drawing attention to suspicions that the facility illegally trades wild animals.
Czech authorities, which oversee animal exports abroad, allow all exports, but they have several unanswered questions about the Indian facility. For example, they are not clear why so many species travel to Asia from the Czech Republic and how they subsequently thrive there.

The Czech Republic has historically been considered a breeding power. It is not surprising that tens of thousands of animals travel from here to the whole world every year, for example successfully bred falcons, various types of parrots or chameleons and other reptiles.

Last year, however, a new location was added to the list of export destinations, namely the Indian rescue and breeding facility Vantara. In the past, the German daily Süddeutschche Zeitung has already pointed out that an “incredible” number of animals are being imported there, and it is unclear whether some of them come from the wild, and it has found out that some traders who supply animals to Vantara may have set up fictitious zoos in order to legalize the exports.

The mega-project, which is not accessible to the public and has no parallel in the history of mankind, has begun to acquire animals of all kinds from all over the world.

The Czech Republic was immediately added to the list of countries cooperating with this project. As Radiožurnál has discovered, everything is done through Jindřich Blahož, a breeder and trader from South Bohemia. While he used to provide Czech zoos with rats and greens for feeding, he has started a much bigger business in the last year. Under his leadership, thousands of animals began to flow to India through the Ruzyně airport.

Everything is done completely legally, but Czech authorities point out that there are many uncertainties surrounding the fate of the animals exported in this way. "The question of whether the animals actually end up in that Indian facility and how they are treated is relevant given the huge numbers of specimens exported," said Miriam Loužecká, a spokeswoman for the Czech Environmental Inspectorate.

A huge number of different species began to be exported from the country. In addition to the less protected ones, such as monitor lizards, pythons or turkeys, animals that are among the most strictly protected specimens in the world, i.e. critically endangered, also began to appear in export documents.

Over two dozen radiated tortoises, 13 iguanas and 22 blue geckos traveled to India. Primates were also headed there, with a dozen cotton-top tamarins, 10 ruffed lemurs, 21 golden-headed lion tamarins and 20 pygmy marmosets travelling in transport boxes.

According to statistics from the Ministry of the Environment, which Radiožurnál has at its disposal, over 850 internationally protected animals have so far been transported to this facility, according to the recognised annexes to the international convention on trade in endangered species (CITES).

But the list does not end there. The ministry only registers endangered species. The complete data is kept by the regional veterinary administration, which has an overview of all exported specimens.

And as several independent sources confirmed to Radiožurnál, the aforementioned Czech trader was responsible for the vast majority of these exports. Over 440 kangaroos, almost six thousand reptiles, 68 deer and 28 bison made their way to the Indian live collection.

According to the veterinary administration, one breeder exported a total of more than 6,700 animals. And more exports are planned. For comparison, the Prague Zoo has roughly the same number of animals, but of different species.

table:
reptiles 5,848
kangaroos 441
primates 217
llamas 138
deer 68
donkeys 34
bisons 28
sloths 21
predators 5

Czech businessman Jindřich Blahož is the most active in the entire European Union in terms of the number of animals exported to this organization. This is according to the list of the EU database Traces NT for the years 2023 to 2025, which must be reported to all official animal exports to third countries. The Czech Republic shines in it with thousands of animals as the most active, second in order is Denmark, from which 51 parrots left, and Belgium follows with 22 parrots and other birds.

Since 2023, Blahož has owned a zoo corner in Mikulov on the border with Austria. There are also several cages with smaller species of monkeys in the South Bohemian village where he lives. But he also finds such a huge number of animals abroad – from Germany, Poland, the Netherlands, Italy to Peru. He acquired 21 sloths and two anteaters from a South American country.

"I ask more or less through people I know. All the breeders work together and know each other, so it's possible to find out who breeds which species. The Czechs are a breeding powerhouse, what is bred here is not bred anywhere else in the world," Blahož describes how everything goes.

In the Czech Republic, he fulfills all the requirements, proves the origin of the animals, that they do not come from the wild, obtains the necessary permits and sends them to India by cargo plane. He then receives inquiries about specific animals directly from the facility.

According to Blahož, the Indian owner of the park would like all the animals in the world. "They ask about different species and they either get them or they don't. They complete, supplement their collection and want it to be complete. They want to have basically all the species of animals that exist," the businessman explains, explaining why so many specimens are flowing to India.

But even such an intention raises doubts among Czech authorities and animal export experts, with whom Radiožurnál had the opportunity to discuss the situation.

They are not clear why, in addition to rare animals, common but rare animals, such as fur color or farm animals, are also traveling halfway around the world. At the same time, they are wondering whether animals that are commonly kept in Europe should travel to a rescue center in India.

Luxury in Indian style As is probably already clear, the Indian facility Vantara is not an ordinary zoo, as we know from the Czech Republic and Central Europe, it is a huge complex of enclosures and pavilions, which was built by Amant Ambani, the son of the richest man in Asia, Mukesh Ambani. He officially named it the Greens Zoological Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre (GZRRC). The size of the entire project, which, according to available information, reaches an area of approximately 12 square kilometers, is also reflected in the number of animals kept.

The private facility located next to the largest refinery complex in the world has not yet been made accessible to the public, which is one of the conditions that zoos must meet in the Czech Republic. The World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) also thinks so. According to its statutes, the mission of zoos is education and awareness-raising activities, and they should also present the species they keep to the public. However, the Vantara facility has not yet become a member of this association.

According to Blahož, he (Ambani) does not plan to open it to the public in the future. "The zoo is open to the public, but only to experts in the given industry. He does not let ordinary people in there who throw food at the animals, as is happening here. He does not deal with such things and never will, because it is so huge that he would probably go crazy. So the facility serves experts in the given field," he says, adding that he knows the owner of the facility.

But at the very beginning in 2013, there was a project to save elephants, which people used to harvest timber or force them to perform in circuses. In an interview, the architect of the project, Ambani, said that he was influenced by his mother when they bought a sick elephant while traveling together as a child and began to take care of it.

And with such a mission, the Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust (RKTEWT) rescue center was also established years ago. The owners created a paradise on earth for the largest land mammals, in which, in addition to huge pastures, there are pools with water jets, operating theaters and first-class breeding care.

Later, the center began to grow, for example, with rescued leopards that had been hit by a car, for example; there should be up to 256 such wild cats in the facility. This is according to the annual report between 2023 and 2024.

The rescued animals are said to include crocodiles imported from farms in Africa, where they are commercially bred for their skin. It is in Vantara that they are then given a "weight loss treatment" to get back to their standard weight, unlike their previous stay, where they tried to achieve the largest possible skin surface area, according to a promotional video.

The aforementioned annual report also outlines the mission that is defining Vantara. “The GZRRC strives to save species by combining our expertise in animal care and conservation science with our commitment to inspiring conservation through best practices and educating people,” reads one of the first paragraphs.

The report claims that the center is home to over ten thousand animals, but this information is outdated. Joint investigative work by journalists from the German daily Süddeutscher Zeitung and the Venezuelan media outlet Armando Info revealed that, especially in the second half of 2024, there were huge shipments of animals from all over the world.

During this period alone, 39 thousand animals from more than thirty countries traveled to the Indian facility. Based on an analysis, the Süddeutscher Zeitung concluded that the largest number of animals left from the United Arab Emirates. The facility now even lists the number on its website as 150 thousand.

These numbers mean one thing: Vantara is the largest breeding project in the history of the world. According to the company, the animals are cared for by over two hundred veterinarians and two thousand breeders.

The park received political support from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself, who had himself immortalized with several animals at Vantara in the spring of this year. The facility had previously received an award from the Indian government recognizing the living conditions of the rescued elephants.

Radiožurnál contacted Vantara and sent her a series of questions, but no one from the facility responded by the time the article was published.

But buying animals all over the world carries great risks, as experts and world organizations warn in the media. The huge demand for live animals can disrupt the global market, which is emptying, which creates a good breeding ground for poachers and smugglers. Where will traders get animals from when the only available animals are found in the wild?

German journalists have concluded that many of Vantara's traders are based in countries such as Venezuela, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Indonesia. According to them, these countries are considered hotbeds of illegal trade in animals that are captured directly from the wild. However, Vantara's management has repeatedly denied such accusations.

For example, the South African Wildlife Forum, which brings together 30 organizations, asked the environment minister in March this year for the government to investigate the export of wild animals to Vantara. The Independent reported this, saying that they are concerned that the species imported in this way will become the subject of trade. However, the Indian rescue center denied all suspicions and said that it has always acted according to the law.

Vantara has not yet become a member of the internationally recognized organization World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA), which brings together gardens around the world. And as the association confirmed to Radiožurnál, it has not even applied for membership yet.

However, it has recently expanded the list of the Eurasian Association, which has its headquarters in Moscow. It brings together gardens from Russia, Kazakhstan and China. From the Czech Republic, the gardens of Hluboká, Chleby and Olomouc are on the list.

Unanswered questions from authorities
Several state institutions supervise the export of animals from the Czech Republic. Animals are conceptually divided into those protected under the CITES global convention and common species. For protected species, the breeder must prove their origin, and the authorities then examine the purpose of their departure or assess whether the export will not endanger the conservation of the species.

All animals have so far traveled with the "Z" designation, i.e. for zoological purposes. But Vantara is not a regular zoo, and it is not even clear whether the exported species from Central Europe need to be rescued in an Indian rescue center. The Nature and Landscape Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic and the Ministry of the Environment are now also seeking an answer to this question.

"We are of course dealing with the situation regarding the circumstances of further breeding and its overall concept and other issues related to this, and we are carefully examining these circumstances," said the spokeswoman for the ministry, Veronika Krejčí.

Through the agency, the ministry is trying to obtain binding answers from the Indian counterpart of CITES. Even if the authorities have doubts about the position from India, they must take it as a relevant basis for deciding on export applications.

“Simply put, if all the details about the origin of the species, its level of threat and the place where the specimen is to be placed are in order, there is no reason for the Ministry of the Environment not to issue the requested permit,” said Krejčí.

At the same time, she said that at the moment they do not have information that would indicate that the animals being kept could become the subject of illegal activities.

Inspectors from the Czech Environmental Inspection also have doubts. Although they do not comment on the export permit, they do check all export crates at Prague airport before departure to India.

However, they do not like the idea of the Indian businessman that he would like to return the animals to the wild. "Given the genetic dispositions, which are mainly determined by the fact that animals are raised for many generations under human care, this is completely unrealistic for most species, and is also risky for wild populations of the species in question (possible introduction of non-native diseases, genetic defects into the gene pool, etc.)," said spokesperson Miriam Loužecká.

But Czech officials are most surprised by the unprecedented number of animals exported to one facility. They also do not know the conditions in which the animals continue to live.

“The numbers of individuals and species entering the facility are astonishing, and we must remain vigilant against any activities that may be linked to the facility. In this case, concerns are warranted, as the facility often contains rare species that are difficult to breed and require demanding conditions, and breeding them can be complicated even in modern European zoos that benefit from many years of experience,” Loužecká explained.

The Indian Vantara facility was also discussed at the February meeting of the CITES Standing Committee. The latter subsequently obliged the secretariat to maintain communication with the center and cooperate more closely with it regarding imported animals. A mission by the secretariat to Vantara should also take place this year, which should verify the information provided earlier.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know why the Greens Zoological Rescue and Rehabilitation Kingdom doesn't appear in the CZA's 2024-2025 Annual Inventory of Animals In Indian Zoos? It appears in previous years, but is seem completely gone in this year's, with no results for Greens Zoo/Vantara.
 
This video explains some of their plans and operations, not in-depth and with data at hand as a sensationalistic video is supposed to do, and some things striked me when Anant Ambani was interviewed:

He really seems passionate about the project and seems confident that what he does is 110% right and done in the right way, being the son of the owner of a huge petrolchemical company maybe he's naive of the whole picture, maybe he's good at lying, maybe the experts he hired "shell" him from any criticism and hole they receive from the media because otherwise their paycheck is at risk, maybe it's really his newfound hobby to reabilitate/rescue animals, as much as he can, but many things make me "twist my nose" as an Italian saying goes, given common knowledge most people in this forum will have and putting just a bit of critical thinking into play:

The video talks about their "4 pillars", one of which is rewilding, and asseses zoonotic desises and biosecurity procedures before releasing animals: however they also say that the majority of their animals would not survive if released, and throughout the video show a variety of farmed forms such as albinos, piedbald, melanistic and many other variations - which may have been really rescued, as well as bought to "prevent abuse", while unknowingly fueling the market behind - which are not candidates for reintroduction.

They do show their alleged success in breeding Spix's macaws, but show no chicks, and talk about the "international joint program" of release of the parrot but, correct me if I'm mistaken, Vantara was not among the facilities to participate, and just bought them from somewhere in EU.

They also talk about genetic diveristy, but again, colourful phenotypes and other unvaluable canditates such as the Al Wabra okapis will likely not make it into the list of released animals.

Some enclosures also seem overcrowded, but that's an opinion, I don't know if rehabilitation of these animals can allow for more of them to live together, despite some apparent conflict between tabby tigers being shown.

The fact that the Czech dealer also states than Ambani wants every species/type of animal also worries me, though he likely only cares about "higher" vertebrates and some reptiles, but what on earth will you do with 6000 reptiles? The reptile house showed in the video does not seem spacious and is overcrowded like the big cats' enclosures.

Also, if this is not supposed to be a public facility, what's with all the theming, decorative gardening, paths, signage and ornamental animals? Either a display of wealth and power or simply leasure space for him and his guests?

Talking about the Asian cheetah project, aren't all the remaining animals in an Iranian centre? Their animals come from South Africa, and there's a number of king cheetah morphs, meaning their value is likely 0 for reintroduction.

Their work with elephants and community engagement seems remarkable, that I have to give to them, it is a noble goal that someone with the money can make, but doesn't excuse their lack of transparency, greenwashing and huge hoarding of animals.

All in all, is this a billionaires's own playground and greenwashed hobby, or a project started in good will that is taking some unorthodox methods because of the people that run it?
I have yet to decide, but I'm leaning towards the first.
 
This video explains some of their plans and operations, not in-depth and with data at hand as a sensationalistic video is supposed to do, and some things striked me when Anant Ambani was interviewed:

He really seems passionate about the project and seems confident that what he does is 110% right and done in the right way, being the son of the owner of a huge petrolchemical company maybe he's naive of the whole picture, maybe he's good at lying, maybe the experts he hired "shell" him from any criticism and hole they receive from the media because otherwise their paycheck is at risk, maybe it's really his newfound hobby to reabilitate/rescue animals, as much as he can, but many things make me "twist my nose" as an Italian saying goes, given common knowledge most people in this forum will have and putting just a bit of critical thinking into play:

The video talks about their "4 pillars", one of which is rewilding, and asseses zoonotic desises and biosecurity procedures before releasing animals: however they also say that the majority of their animals would not survive if released, and throughout the video show a variety of farmed forms such as albinos, piedbald, melanistic and many other variations - which may have been really rescued, as well as bought to "prevent abuse", while unknowingly fueling the market behind - which are not candidates for reintroduction.

They do show their alleged success in breeding Spix's macaws, but show no chicks, and talk about the "international joint program" of release of the parrot but, correct me if I'm mistaken, Vantara was not among the facilities to participate, and just bought them from somewhere in EU.

They also talk about genetic diveristy, but again, colourful phenotypes and other unvaluable canditates such as the Al Wabra okapis will likely not make it into the list of released animals.

Some enclosures also seem overcrowded, but that's an opinion, I don't know if rehabilitation of these animals can allow for more of them to live together, despite some apparent conflict between tabby tigers being shown.

The fact that the Czech dealer also states than Ambani wants every species/type of animal also worries me, though he likely only cares about "higher" vertebrates and some reptiles, but what on earth will you do with 6000 reptiles? The reptile house showed in the video does not seem spacious and is overcrowded like the big cats' enclosures.

Also, if this is not supposed to be a public facility, what's with all the theming, decorative gardening, paths, signage and ornamental animals? Either a display of wealth and power or simply leasure space for him and his guests?

Talking about the Asian cheetah project, aren't all the remaining animals in an Iranian centre? Their animals come from South Africa, and there's a number of king cheetah morphs, meaning their value is likely 0 for reintroduction.

Their work with elephants and community engagement seems remarkable, that I have to give to them, it is a noble goal that someone with the money can make, but doesn't excuse their lack of transparency, greenwashing and huge hoarding of animals.

All in all, is this a billionaires's own playground and greenwashed hobby, or a project started in good will that is taking some unorthodox methods because of the people that run it?
I have yet to decide, but I'm leaning towards the first.
I must say that you perfectly summed up my exact thoughts. I just want to add that I see the video as some weird kind of propaganda - I really can't find a better word for it.
I also think there's something very wrong with the fact that when I first spotted the title of the article, which can be basically translated to "a keeper from Czechia sends thousands of animals to India", I immediately thought of Vantara. Even though it isn't something often talked about in local media.
 
Last edited:
I just want to add that I see the video as some weird kind of propaganda - I really can't find a better word for it.
That was what I meant when I said sensationalistic video, it 100% is propaganda for their project, when something striked me as being at least good-willing, it always got shut down by the image of colourful morphs that are supposed to deceive and get close with an uneducated audience, something that exists here on this very forum, but is somewhat much less.
 
All in all, is this a billionaires's own playground and greenwashed hobby, or a project started in good will that is taking some unorthodox methods because of the people that run it?
I have yet to decide, but I'm leaning towards the first.

So far to me it seems like a weird hybrid between an animal horder situation masquerading "resque / sanctuary" and typical historical royal menagerie. What it definitely is not - a modern zoo. The only reason that place has "zoo" in its name is to weasel around international trade regulations and local animal licening rules.

What I however find fairly believable is that it all started and is run by the owner based on his genuine love for animals. But instead of acquiring a dog, a bearded agama and caring for 2 ex-stray cats like your average family, his private collection reflects his financial means and location.
 
I must say that you perfectly summed up my exact thoughts. I just want to add that I see the video as some weird kind of propaganda - I really can't find a better word for it.
I also think there's something very wrong with the fact that when I first spotted the title of the article, which can be basically translated to "a keeper from Czechia sends thousands of animals to India", I immediately thought of Vantara. Even though it isn't something often talked about in local media.
I haven’t yet watched the whole video, but I have spotted what looks like a critically endangered St Vincent Amazon (parrot) interacting with a much commoner species.
Obvs one can’t judge this out of context, but I do hope hybrids aren’t in the offing
 
I haven’t yet watched the whole video, but I have spotted what looks like a critically endangered St Vincent Amazon (parrot) interacting with a much commoner species.
Obvs one can’t judge this out of context, but I do hope hybrids aren’t in the offing
They indeed do keep those. I don't know how many they have though, but they obtained several individuals from Germany.
 
He does not let ordinary people in there who throw food at the animals, as is happening here. He does not deal with such things and never will, because it is so huge that he would probably go crazy

So the guy who can afford to import tens and thousands of animals (and skirt international trade laws) somehow can’t afford to hire an army of security guards to keep visitors in check? Yeah right :rolleyes:

If you don’t expect “ordinary people” then why even announce the whole world your silly “little” pet project. As far as I know, millionaires who have menageries and breeding projects, such as Al Busta, Rum Creek and Will Ferrel, usually try to keep it to their animals under the wraps, only known by the animal industry or those interested in it. Yet Anant and co. feel like they have to flex whatever they do for the public to know through news outlets or obnoxious social media posts, only for Anant to look down on the public (who I assume are patrons for his family’s business, thus funding Anant’s dream project)

Not only do I feel irritated that laws are being broken over this, but I feel sad for the children in the region (assuming they could even afford entering the menagerie in the first place) who will never get to be marveled or inspired by the greater animal kingdom Vantara could have offered.
 
Back
Top