Saint-Aignan-sur-Cher, Zooparc de Beauval
While, widely regarded as the best zoo in France by the general public, it is most certainly the one with the biggest and most comprehensive collection, but for me not the best. Beauval is a strange beast and though there is nothing particularly wrong with most of the zoo’s enclosures individually, Beauval manages to be less than the sum of its parts. I will apologize to
@sooty mangabey and others in advance, as the following review might be a bit critical.
I know there are plenty of zoo nerds who like Beauval and if you are a fan of big collections, in mostly fine (but in many cases unforgettable) enclosures, this is a place for you. In a way it is reminiscent of Berlin, but then without all the history, but it also has the shamelessly commercial feel of Pairi Daiza, but then without all the theming. My main problem is that this place lacks a soul, there is nothing that makes a Beauval enclosure, a Beauval enclosure and there is absolutely no coherence in this chaotic zoo. The red line visible is that money talks and every year something new should be opened. This new doesn’t have to fit in with the rest of the zoo and should be focused on showing animals to the public, with landscaping and theming of secondary concern. Contrary to Pairi Daiza, the majority of the new additions are spacious and fine for the animals and there are pnly a few eyesores being built from that perspective in the past few years. But every enclosure (complex) seems to be built in a different style. In the Giant Panda area there is cultural theming, new Africa enclosures are a mock rock paradise with fake baobabs, the Indian Rhino area is just a typical French countryside zoo, but bigger, etc. Something that French zoos generally don’t consider is cross-viewing and there are so many examples here where that could easily have been avoided, that it is annoying. If you go to great length to recreate an African (rocky) savannah, it shouldn’t have been difficult to change the topography a tiny bit, so you don’t see the visitors on the other side of the Lion enclosure… Some of the new additions are quite good and I did like the nicely planted Tasmanian Devil enclosure and the Giant Panda outdoors area is one of the best in Europe. The Hippo aviary is also spectacular and it is really huge and great for the birds. From a hippo perspective it is however strange that the land area is not extended into the Nyala & Red River Hog enclosures (it isn't that small now, but could easily be great) or that the outdoor area cannot be separated, which should be really easy… The hippos were only let outside at 10:30 (!!) and only mother and calf were out, so the other two hippos were locked inside the whole day. If you are building such a huge aviary, it is shocking what mistakes how little effort has gone into the hippos themselves. I was also wondering what all those Pikes did in the pool, which was also used by waterfowl…. From an architectural point this aviary is hugely impressive and probably has the best underwater view for Common Hippo in Europe and it is great to see pelicans fly in a zoo. But even then it leaves a sour taste and one wonders whether the hippos are locked in so much to ensure the underwater views are clear…
Hippo aviary (note the pelican in the top of the baobab)
Tasmanian Devil enclosure
Giant Panda enclosure
Next to the hippo aviary is the Equatorial Dome, a 3000 square meter rainforest hall. It is impossible not to compare it with Gondwanaland, Masoala or Burgers’ Bush but if you do it is a complete let-down. It seems as they have taken inspiration from Gondwanaland and Omaha’s Lied Jungle and the only lesson they learnt was not to put tapirs in. It starts already with the entrance, which is a mock rock tunnel appearing out of nowhere, clearly leading you inside a greenhouse (which located on top of a hill, isn’t exactly integrated in the landscape). In such a case using mock rock just makes no sense at all from a theming perspective (contrary to the entrance to the hippo aviary where you actually go underground and can't see where you are going). The dome itself is crammed full with enclosures and a winding pathway. This place will never produce a rainforest feeling, as there is simply no place for enough trees amidst all the paths, water bodies and enclosures. The execution of this hall comes across as lazy. I counted no less then 12 (!) waterfalls and only 3 free-flying bird species (and when do zoos finally learn Superb Starlings are arid country birds, not forest birds….). The fact you hear bird song played from a speaker says enough. The individual enclosures are mostly fine, but unspectacular. The monkey enclosures have a lot of height and climbing opportunities and the Giant Otter tank is also large. A highlight are the terraria spread around the building, they are really pretty with an interesting collection. The Pygmy Hippos get the short end of the stick with a tiny land area and one was swimming stereotypically a long time. The manatee pool (1 or 1.6 million liters?) is a disappointment. It is impressive at first sight, but seriously overcrowded, more so than Singapore. At least there is always a manatee visible in the murky water. A serious issue with the hall is the constant glare on the windows and cross-viewing between the upper and the lower paths, so any pretence of a rainforest is quickly gone…. I am not sure what the idea behind this building was, probably most normal visitors like it, but there was no need to build such an imposing dome if you only want to cram it with standard enclosures and when you forget to hire a landscape architect.
Harpy Eagle aviary
Dome entrance and when using mock-rock makes no sense
Tunnel into the dome
First view after entering the dome (Manatee tank)
Pygmy Hippo enclosure
S-American terraria
Cross-viewing in the dome
Upper path through the dome
I also do have to mention the spectacular bird show, it really is spectacular to see so many birds in free flight and every part of the show had to be bigger and more spectacular than other zoos. I visited the show twice (or at least the last bit), because it is such a unique experience. I noticed that (like all talks in Beauval) it is completely scripted to the last dot, with the exact same phrases used twice. Whereas the bird show is spectacular, the large amount of bird cages in the beginning of the zoo is not. Most aviaries are seriously outdated and none are better than average. The greenhouse is supposed to be new, but here many cages were also small. Signage was hit-and-miss anyway as the free-ranging Great Blue Turaco was unsigned. But at least there was signage, the vast majority of fish throughout the zoo weren't signed at all. This is also what many zoos would do different than Beauval. Instead of fixing all these outdated bird, primate and carnivore enclosures at the bottom of the zoo first, Beauval builds huge complexes and brings in new species in extension areas. The older parts of the zoo really looked tired and were never designed for the masses that Beauval attracts now. In the coming years the Great Apes will also need significant renovations for their enclosures as privacy is lacking and space-wise the enclosures are only acceptable.
Chimpanzee island
one of two Orangutan indoor enclosures
Tiny parrot aviaries
Raptor and larger parrot aviaries
All in all, Beauval is still a must see, as one of Europe’s largest zoos, but for me it was a disappointment, even though I still enjoyed my day here. It seems all possible charisma has been sucked away by their smaller neighbour 150 km west….
There are more pictures in the gallery:
ZooParc de Beauval - ZooChat