Disney's Animal Kingdom® Park Is Disney done building major live animal exhibits?

DavidBrown

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Disney's Animal Kingdom is now 20 years old. The last major live animal exhibit they opened there was the Asia zone in 1999.

There have been modifications of the African and Asian exhibits with various species added, moved, or removed (e.g., wild dogs in Kilimanjaro Safari, lion-tailed macaques where the Malayan tapirs were), but no major live animal exhibits have been built since then. The subsequent additions to the park have been rides (Dinoland carnival rides, the Yeti coaster) and Avatarland.

Has anybody heard any credible plans or rumors of plans that Disney may add other continental zones to the park (South America? Australia?) that would have live animal exhibits? There was a perpetual rumor for several years that they would add giant pandas to the Asia area, but that obviously never happened.
 
Disney's Animal Kingdom is currently the only Disney park where there are no current big expansion rumors. The current big rumor is a refresh of Chester and Hester's Dinorama, but as this area is based on extinct animals, we will almost definitely not see any new additions, unless they add something like birds or reptiles for thematic purposes, which isn't mentioned in the possibilities. Still, there's nothing concrete.

These days, Disney isn't really big on creating non-IP themed lands, so I doubt we'd see just South America or just Australia. For this reason, I think a Zootopia themed expansion would be "ideal". There used to be a rumor that Zootopia would replace Rafiki's Planet Watch, but I think a well-themed Zootopia area featuring the various boroughs from Zootopia (Tundratown, Sahara Square, the Rainforest District, etc.) could bring some of the animals from the movie like snow leopards, wolves, fennec foxes, sloths, etc.
 
The only rumor I've heard is that Disney has grown shy of animal attractions, because of either real or expected protests since they're "profiting" off of animals. Otherwise, Indiana Jones is expected to go into DAK where Dinoland currently is.

I personally don't think they should be adding any new continental zones until Asia is given a proper shake. I expected some of the Himalayan terai animals to come in when Expedition Everest opened, and at least an orangutan when The Jungle Book came out. Neither happened of course. Instead we got dumb blue cat people.
 
Last edited:
I personally don't think they should be adding any new continental zones until Asia is given a proper shake. I expected some of the Himalayan terai animals to come in when Expedition Everest opened said:
While I agree that Orangutans and other Asian Species could be added to make Asia more complete, I disagree with that being an addition of Mountain animals only due to the extreme heat and humidity most times of the year in Central Florida. I know it is possible but why put the animals through that? There are plenty of tropical species that can do much better.

One thing that could be added down the road is if they turn Dinoland into an Indiana Jones themed area could be to add more South American Species which would not be very difficult for them. It would fit well with a new ride since the first Indiana Jones movie starts in a South American Rain forest. Otherwise I dont see Disney adding much else since the park is doing well and IP's are big right now with them.
 
In terms of Asia, part of the original plans called for an Orangutan and Sun Bear facility, so maybe Disney could bring those in in the future. As for 'Himalayan' animals that would do well in the tropics, well.... bringing in Red Pandas, Binturongs, Himalayan Tahrs, Demoiselle Cranes, etc. (Shave the Tahrs, as I assume happens in Taronga). Another idea I had is possibly bringing in another continent and exhibits based on movies Disney made. For instance "The Princess and the Frog" for animals from Louisiana (alligators, fireflies, deer, and animals not in the movie such as snakes, bears, cougars, raccoons).
 

As someone who has ridden the blue-cat Flight of Passage ride, I can state with 100% confidence it's the best ride I've been on in any theme park ever. It is worth the 4 hour wait.

The boat ride, however, is meh.
 
The only rumor I've heard is that Disney has grown shy of animal attractions, because of either real or expected protests since they're "profiting" off of animals. Otherwise, Indiana Jones is expected to go into DAK where Dinoland currently is.

I personally don't think they should be adding any new continental zones until Asia is given a proper shake. I expected some of the Himalayan terai animals to come in when Expedition Everest opened, and at least an orangutan when The Jungle Book came out. Neither happened of course. Instead we got dumb blue cat people.

I've not heard anything regarding the rumor that Disney has grown shy of animal attractions. There were protests regarding Disney's animal attractions around Animal Kingdom's opening, but I've not heard much about any sustained protests since (if Disney had been scared off by the initial protests, I'm not sure the company would have gone ahead and added Asia afterwards, as until the much later addition of Expedition Everest, Asia (like Africa still is) was mostly centered around the animals).

There has been a persistent rumor that what is currently DinoLand USA could give way to an Indiana Jones area, possibly centered on South America. Most of this rumor is probably attributable to the (relative) ease with which Disney could replicate its Disneyland Indiana Jones attraction over Dinosaur (which is constructed on a very similar blueprint). I have seen no particular speculation or sourced rumors that any such Indiana Jones/South American area might include new animal attractions. The most recent word on this is that any large-scale retheme has been scaled back, thus leaving DinoLand, but replacing the current Chester and Hester's Dinorama and its attractions with a roller coaster of some kind (presumably the Dinosaur and Boneyard attractions would remain).

All this having been said, I think Disney is unlikely to add any significant new animal attractions in the near future, for several reasons. First, the park has been recently expanded with the addition of Pandora and the expansion of evening operating hours with several new entertainment options; this has helped temper the once-widespread notion that Animal Kingdom was a "half-day" park. There is enough to do at Animal Kingdom for most people, and with the Dinorama area arguably the only area in the park that needs substantial work, I would not foresee huge future investment in the foreseeable future. The addition of Pandora, River of Light, the after-dark version of Kilimanjaro Safaris, Tree of Life Awakenings, and other entertainment options quite substantially improved Animal Kingdom, so I would not anticipate anything large going in. Second, Disney has announced many future attractions and other plans for its other three parks; in particular, both Epcot and Hollywood Studios in the midst of major redevelopment (Hollywood Studios will be mostly complete when Star Wars land opens in late 2019; Epcot has just begun several large construction projects, and a significant redevelopment of the Future World area has been announced), with several additions to the Magic Kingdom as well. These announced new attractions ought to keep Disney busy up to (and perhaps past) the upcoming 50th anniversary of Disney World Resort in 2021. Thirdly, I'm not sure that Disney or many of its guests (outside true zoo fanatics) see much need in increasing the number of animal attractions. Disney went out of its way to establish Animal Kingdom as more than a zoo, and the addition of substantial animal exhibits (outside the areas I suggest later) will be likely seen as superfluous. Finally, Disney and most theme parks are leaning heavily toward IP (intellectual property) supporting most expansions. Almost all of Disney's announced future plans center in some way around Disney-owned intellectual property. When Disney does decide to invest significantly in Animal Kingdom again, I would imagine any new land or attraction will have some significant tie to an intellectual property, whether Indiana Jones or something else. Any animals added will likely be those which can fit in with the IP.

Having said all that, many true Disney fans believe Animal Kingdom is the crown jewel of Disney World parks in terms of design, and Disney appears to recognize this in its careful attention to detail (the oft-maligned Pandora expansion fits the (until recently) undersung portion of Animal Kingdom's original intention to focus on real, prehistoric, and mythical creatures). It is worth noting that while Pandora is, of course, IP focused (as is the soon-to-open reimagined bird show, which will tie into the movie Up), other recent additions (albeit of a much smaller scale), such as Rivers of Light and Tree of Life Awakenings, do not have a strong IP but instead rely on concepts developed from the ideas around which the park was originally conceived.
 
In terms of Asia, part of the original plans called for an Orangutan and Sun Bear facility, so maybe Disney could bring those in in the future. As for 'Himalayan' animals that would do well in the tropics, well.... bringing in Red Pandas, Binturongs, Himalayan Tahrs, Demoiselle Cranes, etc. (Shave the Tahrs, as I assume happens in Taronga).

Aren't sun bears on the phase out list for AZA facilities? That could be the reason that idea was torpedoed.

I was actually thinking of Golden Takins when I was first considered adding terai animals even though they live at a higher elevation than I thought practical. If Singapore can keep giant pandas, I'm sure DAK can figure out how to appropriately keep animals from the foothills.


Another idea I had is possibly bringing in another continent and exhibits based on movies Disney made. For instance "The Princess and the Frog" for animals from Louisiana (alligators, fireflies, deer, and animals not in the movie such as snakes, bears, cougars, raccoons).

Florida is chock full of alligators. Not sure that Disney World wants to start caring for them or that visitors actually want to see them.

Part of the problem, however, is theme. I've heard Joe Rohde state that the theme is supposed to be Man and his relationship with nature. This is why the yeti fits in, and why the blue cat people do not. Indiana Jones doesn't fit either; riding an elephant or being afraid of snakes is a side effect of Dr. Jones' work as an archeologist.

But I digress. Conservation is certainly a part of our relationship with nature, but DAK is obliged to be more than a zoo. It needs rides and attractions to bolster the animal attractions. An orangutan habitat would have helped forward the deforestation message on Kali River Rapids and a show themed around Shaolin Kung-Fu and its five animal styles would have been amazing. It would be repeating itself now, but a rollercoaster themed around dragons (of the Asian variety) and fireworks would have been a superb addition.
 
Aren't sun bears on the phase out list for AZA facilities? That could be the reason that idea was torpedoed.

I was actually thinking of Golden Takins when I was first considered adding terai animals even though they live at a higher elevation than I thought practical. If Singapore can keep giant pandas, I'm sure DAK can figure out how to appropriately keep animals from the foothills.




Florida is chock full of alligators. Not sure that Disney World wants to start caring for them or that visitors actually want to see them.

Part of the problem, however, is theme. I've heard Joe Rohde state that the theme is supposed to be Man and his relationship with nature. This is why the yeti fits in, and why the blue cat people do not. Indiana Jones doesn't fit either; riding an elephant or being afraid of snakes is a side effect of Dr. Jones' work as an archeologist.

But I digress. Conservation is certainly a part of our relationship with nature, but DAK is obliged to be more than a zoo. It needs rides and attractions to bolster the animal attractions. An orangutan habitat would have helped forward the deforestation message on Kali River Rapids and a show themed around Shaolin Kung-Fu and its five animal styles would have been amazing. It would be repeating itself now, but a rollercoaster themed around dragons (of the Asian variety) and fireworks would have been a superb addition.

Interestingly enough, Disney World does (or very recently did) "exhibit" American Alligators at Epcot, in the Living with the Land ride, but that's beside the point. Joe Rohde is going the direction Disney as a company is going, which is to forget any and all original intent for the parks and go straight for already-established IPs. I think an orangutan habitat would have been perfect paired with Kali River Rapids, though.
 
Interestingly enough, Disney World does (or very recently did) "exhibit" American Alligators at Epcot, in the Living with the Land ride, but that's beside the point. Joe Rohde is going the direction Disney as a company is going, which is to forget any and all original intent for the parks and go straight for already-established IPs. I think an orangutan habitat would have been perfect paired with Kali River Rapids, though.

It's been ~30-years since I've visited Disney World, so, yeah, that would have been news to me!

No arguement otherwise about Joe Rohde going with the company mandate. Since the board elevated Chapek to oversee the parks, plugging them with successful film properties was a foregone conclusion. If he actually succeeds Iger, though... I might just stop caring entirely. Things are starting to remind me of the Pressler & Harris era.
 
Back
Top