In defence … we didn’t have much to go off from before his short time at the facility. What we had were observations obtained through camera traps, and particularly camera traps from the time were often prone to producing low detail results. This meant that such details as those of the face, horn, and teeth were likely obscured in such footage. But of course when you have the animal himself to work with, and better yet his deceased body at your disposal, you can easily conduct more thorough observations.I did some more digging and found that Musofa had been identified as rhino number 56 back in 2013. Then in 2020 there was another news report about him. But the information in that article was a bit confusing, because it said he was “around 7 years old” in 2020.
If that were true, it would mean he was 0–1 years old in 2013, which doesn’t make sense, because at that age he wouldn’t have had any clear identifying features yet.
So I tried breaking it down into two possibilities:
1) If he was 7 years old in 2020 → then in 2025 he would be 12.
2) If he was 7 years old in 2013 → then in 2025 he would be 19.
But no matter which way you calculate it, once he died it turned out he was actually 45 years old — which is off by 20–30 years from the previous estimates.
Honestly, I think the method used to estimate the age of wild Javan rhinos really needs to be completely overhauled.
source : Rhino Named Musofa Caught On Camera Wallowing In Ujung Kulon National Park
Rhino Named Musofa Caught On Camera Wallowing In Ujung Kulon National Park (29 Juni 2020, 20:38)
I do not claim to know how old exactly this rhino was at time of death. But I very much doubt that he was a calf in 2013, and I have my doubts about him being 7 in 2020. I question whether early estimates had something to do with the size of the horn observed. But on the whole, Javan rhinos grow small horns - occasionally none. 45, or something slightly younger, to me anyways seems like a likely number.
Last edited:




