Leopards aren't doing very well in the wild

Leopards have long been thought to be doing okay in the wild, but a new comprehensive study of their range loss since 1750 suggests that is not the case.

Even recently, I was rather skeptical of their listening as "near threatened", considering that only African and Indian leopards seem to still have sizeable populations (and both of those are becoming increasingly threatened by population expansion). I think it's good that they got this study through and are focusing more effort on the species, but I wonder how much success they will have in turning leopards into a flagship species like they have with other big cats.

It's a shame that the AZA only manages one of the nine subspecies when there are others that need conservation support and strong ex situ programs as well. Javans, in particular, are rare or perhaps nonexistent outside of Asia.
 
considering that only African and Indian leopards seem to still have sizeable populations (and both of those are becoming increasingly threatened by population expansion).

It's a shame that the AZA only manages one of the nine subspecies when there are others that need conservation support and strong ex situ programs as well. Javans, in particular, are rare or perhaps nonexistent outside of Asia.

And there's an argument to be made that only Indian Leopard really do, as I believe it's likely that the African populations really do/did represent multiple subspecies. To my knowledge, the study that lumped them all together wasn't very thorough and had a very small sample size.

It really would be nice to see the AZA create a program to one or two other subspecies, like they do with tigers. I'd imagine the main problem, however, would be that Leopards aren't as popular in zoos so less collections keep them. Still, there are still breeding populations of both Persian and North Chinese Leopards in the US (though mostly non-AZA) so it's probably not too late to start a new breeding program without needing to source too many founders from Europe or Asia. As for Javans, there is still a small population in Europe but I don't think it's sustainable long term.

~Thylo:cool:
 
The New York Times has been all kinds of cheerful when it comes to wildlife news these past couple of weeks. I guess they feel guilty about suggesting that there were more tigers in the world than was estimated?

A possible bright spot for Russian leopards and tigers?

Good News in Dark Times for Russian Tigers & Leopards

Richard Connif said:
The importance of the Narvinskii Pass to these travels came to light more than a decade ago. The Wildlife Conservation Society was funding research then by Linda Kerley and the late Mikhail Borisenko of the Zoological Society of London. They were “actually out trying to track and collect scat for DNA analysis and noticed animals moving repeatedly across this ridge,” said Miquelle. “It’s a really good example of how basic scientific research can help define necessary conservation actions. The work was being done for other purposes, but the tunnel was by far the most valuable outcome of that research.”

According to Miquelle, Ivanov heard about the pass and the threat from the proposed highway. He started to focus on the plight of Amur leopards at about the same time that Putin was adopting the Amur tiger as a favorite cause. Plenty of politicians talk, but Ivanov made things happen, designating Land of the Leopard National Park to protect 1,100 square miles of leopard and tiger habitat in the region in 2011. At the time, the possibility of a tunnel running under the park to separate the big cats from highway traffic was just a topic of discussion. Today it’s an accomplished fact, the price tag (not made public so far) be damned.
 
Back
Top