Lincoln Park Zoo Lincoln Park Zoo Future Developments (Speculation)

JVM

Well-Known Member
10+ year member
Once notorious among zoo nerds for the ancient and out-of-date lion building, Lincoln Park Zoo has made incredible improvements in the last decade and now has a consistent and relative high standard of exhibit quality throughout the facility and maintains a relatively popular collection with the majority of popular species without a single loss to seriously question.

Still, I think it would be fun to see what other zoochatters suggest for the future of this facility - what exhibits are best to renovate, and what is best to replace them?

In previous threads, I have often advocated replacing the Antelope-Zebra area with an Asia complex including bringing back tigers, retaining the milu, takin and camel, moving over gibbons and langurs, and hopefully room for a few new species, maybe even moving some from other locations such as snow leopard and loris, and adding Mountain Zebra and ostrich back to the waterhole in Africa. I have backed somewhat off this proposal since it has been pointed out to me how valuable this area's space is for flexibility however.

Helen Brach Primate House has often been suggested as an area that could be a focus of future renovation as well.

There's been a lot of cool proposals about Brookfield and I'm just curious what comes to people's minds for Lincoln Park.
 
I'd like to see some upgrades on a few enclosures in the Small Mammal-Reptile House, mainly for the animals living in the cramped terrariums laid into one of the walls. I'd also like to see something else done with the red devil cichlids, there are too many in that small space. The polar bear enclosure does leave something to be desired, during my visit this spring, the polar bear was repeatedly pushing off of the side of the pool wall, and swimming back around to do it again. I don't know if this was an issue, so I apologize if it is irrelevant here. As far as the primate house goes, I'd love to see most of the enclosures in there upgraded.
 
I'd like to see some upgrades on a few enclosures in the Small Mammal-Reptile House, mainly for the animals living in the cramped terrariums laid into one of the walls. I'd also like to see something else done with the red devil cichlids, there are too many in that small space. The polar bear enclosure does leave something to be desired, during my visit this spring, the polar bear was repeatedly pushing off of the side of the pool wall, and swimming back around to do it again. I don't know if this was an issue, so I apologize if it is irrelevant here. As far as the primate house goes, I'd love to see most of the enclosures in there upgraded.
The zoo sent out the rest of it's Devil Cichlids, they're no longer exhibited there
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVM
Once notorious among zoo nerds for the ancient and out-of-date lion building, Lincoln Park Zoo has made incredible improvements in the last decade and now has a consistent and relative high standard of exhibit quality throughout the facility and maintains a relatively popular collection with the majority of popular species without a single loss to seriously question.

Still, I think it would be fun to see what other zoochatters suggest for the future of this facility - what exhibits are best to renovate, and what is best to replace them?

In previous threads, I have often advocated replacing the Antelope-Zebra area with an Asia complex including bringing back tigers, retaining the milu, takin and camel, moving over gibbons and langurs, and hopefully room for a few new species, maybe even moving some from other locations such as snow leopard and loris, and adding Mountain Zebra and ostrich back to the waterhole in Africa. I have backed somewhat off this proposal since it has been pointed out to me how valuable this area's space is for flexibility however.

Helen Brach Primate House has often been suggested as an area that could be a focus of future renovation as well.

There's been a lot of cool proposals about Brookfield and I'm just curious what comes to people's minds for Lincoln Park.
I agree. An Asian section would be great. Maybe they could also move the red pandas from the Lion House.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVM
I'd like to see some upgrades on a few enclosures in the Small Mammal-Reptile House, mainly for the animals living in the cramped terrariums laid into one of the walls. I'd also like to see something else done with the red devil cichlids, there are too many in that small space. The polar bear enclosure does leave something to be desired, during my visit this spring, the polar bear was repeatedly pushing off of the side of the pool wall, and swimming back around to do it again. I don't know if this was an issue, so I apologize if it is irrelevant here. As far as the primate house goes, I'd love to see most of the enclosures in there upgraded.
What kind of upgrades do you mean here? Things like enhancing the existing exhibit spaces and/or combining a few, or serious renovations?

I definitely feel like Small Mammal-Reptile House could do with a compete renovation. There are some things to appreciate in that building but every exhibit feels too small and I know some interesting animals have left.

I am fairly certain the building at the Children's Zoo will reopen, but if we entertain for a moment that it were to remain closed, it might not be a bad idea to renovate that and Small Mammal-Reptile House into a larger complex, as the space between the buildings and covered by the Children's Zoo building would probably be double the current footprint of the building... but I'd honestly like to see the Children's Zoo building back.
 
What kind of upgrades do you mean here? Things like enhancing the existing exhibit spaces and/or combining a few, or serious renovations?

I definitely feel like Small Mammal-Reptile House could do with a compete renovation. There are some things to appreciate in that building but every exhibit feels too small and I know some interesting animals have left.

I am fairly certain the building at the Children's Zoo will reopen, but if we entertain for a moment that it were to remain closed, it might not be a bad idea to renovate that and Small Mammal-Reptile House into a larger complex, as the space between the buildings and covered by the Children's Zoo building would probably be double the current footprint of the building... but I'd honestly like to see the Children's Zoo building back.
I wonder what kind of new animals they would add or remove.
 
I want to preface this post by saying something firmly -- Lincoln Park Zoo is in a great place right now, I look forward to visiting in the next month, and I don't think anything is in dire need of change. I think there is a lot of validity in the existing spaces being necessary for flexibility. These are not serious proposals but more creative exercise.

Antelope-Camel Area is renovated into an Asia complex. At the northern end of the complex, a rainforest-themed building houses gibbons, langurs, asian small-clawed otters and red panda with indoor/outdoor access and pygmy slow loris inside as well as an additional nocturnal animal, some herps (perhaps Chinese alligator?) and an aviary. At the southern end, Snow leopard and Takin are featured in a highland-themed exhibit, and in between the rainforest and highland are spacious Amur tiger and Amur leopard yards, as well as two hoofstock yards, for camel and either milu or white-lipped deer. I have explicitly avoided suggesting brand-new species here, only current or recent holdings.

African Journey will also undergo a much smaller renovation. The existing colobus monkey exhibit will be expanded to act as a permanent holding area, with Allen's swamp monkeys added to the mix. The outdoor waterhole will see Mountain Zebra added to replace the outgoing Grevy's and ostrich moved back in as well. I want to speculate the waterhole could probably accept an additional antelope species but I don't know what wuld be most appropriate and/or likely. An additional outdoor/indoor primate exhibit, ideally for Debrazza's monkey, is probably too difficult to include, unfortunately.

Pepper Family Wildlife Center, now with Snow leopard and Red panda elsewhere, will now host Serval again which I think will be a fine complement to the lions. I am unsure what other species could work in the space, but ideally only small species from Africa or North America to compliment the lion and lynx.

Helen Brach Primate House will be renovated next into a neotropical building, though there are still significant space limitations. I am cautious as I am unsure how much space would be available for redevelopment and am unsure which species can be mixed freely and which may need to be separated. The howler monkeys, tamarins, sloth, and titis will be joined by the white-faced saki, spectacled caiman, and golden-headed tamarin from Small Mammal-Reptile House. Spider monkey, squirrel monkey, tamandua, capybara and agouti all seem like they could be sourced and added to the exhibit relatively easily and possibly mixed. There would be birds but I am unsure who would mix where. Toucan or Macaw would likely need their own habitat. The exhibit would need a carnivore and I think the best species that could risk staying indoors is an ocelot. As much as it would be nice to see jaguar, peccary, tapir or anteater return to the collection I am too doubtful the space would allow for any of those without compromising the welfare of either the primates or the larger animal. I think the spider monkeys would be the first guaranteed outdoor access.

After all of the above renovations are complete, Small Mammal-Reptile House - with the otters, caiman, tamarins, loris, and so forth gone, will be redeveloped and expanded. The nocturnal gallery room will remain most similar though I would hope we could make the terrariums a little larger... and while some of the day area will remain, new rooms will be added as well. One addition will be a Madagascar room including crowned lemurs, madagascar boa, hissing cockroach and orb spiders, as well as a small Australia room including wallabies and frilled lizard. Komodo Dragon will be included as a new star species. I do feel the otter and caiman both leave aquatic niches to fill as well but not sure what best suit that role. I'd say to add a small predatory mammal of some kind as well but small carnivores suffer from so little institutional interest it feels worthless to even entertain the idea.

(I am being selfish here. In many ways it probably makes much more practical sense to develop Small Mammal-Reptile House into a neotropical building instead, but the loss of the reptile collection would be much more profound than moving around a few monkeys, and I'd like to keep fennecs, bush babies, and bats around.)

So overall between these proposals, we would hopefully lose very few species (Grevy's Zebra, Chacoan peccary, Red kangaroo, Debrazza's Monkey) while gaining around twenty species, with the loss of the peccary the only one that I feel isn't accounted for by one of the new additions.
 
I have visited Lincoln Park Zoo three times since my previous post, giving me some additional insight into my own proposals:

Antelope-Camel Area is renovated into an Asia complex. At the northern end of the complex, a rainforest-themed building houses gibbons, langurs, asian small-clawed otters and red panda with indoor/outdoor access and pygmy slow loris inside as well as an additional nocturnal animal, some herps (perhaps Chinese alligator?) and an aviary. At the southern end, Snow leopard and Takin are featured in a highland-themed exhibit, and in between the rainforest and highland are spacious Amur tiger and Amur leopard yards, as well as two hoofstock yards, for camel and either milu or white-lipped deer. I have explicitly avoided suggesting brand-new species here, only current or recent holdings.
After visiting in person and doing some ugly map mock-ups I can think about this with more specifics.

The current ungulate barn will be dismantled and a new building similar in size and exterior style to Primate House will replace it. The indoor exhibit will include small mammals, birds and herps including northern tree shrew, pygmy slow loris, bali myna, chinese alligator, and burmese python. Asian small-clawed otters, red panda, and francois langurs will have indoor/outdoor access. Four of the existing yards will remain for hoofstock, retaining camel, takin, and milu/deer, though modifications will be made to fit these species better. A fourth exhibit will be set for a new animal, the Malayan tapir, with a large pool and underwater viewing.

The remaining outdoor yards will be modified in places to allow for habitats for returning Siberian tiger and Amur leopard, and a new Snow leopard habitat.

An additional new species will be included, -- an exhibit similar to the meshed chimpanzee habitat will be consructed on one side of the building to house a meshed mixed gibbon-orangutan exhibit.

The area is four acres, and Milwaukee's current elephant exhibit is an acre and a half I'm told, so it's possible this area could be modified to include elephants, but for my current mock-up I chose to exclude them, and the thought of introducing tapir and orangutan is pretty exciting.

rKXo2Lg.png

I neglected to figure out exactly where to place the doors and I did not think too hard about dividing the lines for the cat exhibits, and I'm very bad at drawing silhouettes.

As a further last-ditch plan if I cannot find space for Australian animals in Small Mammal-Reptile House (see below) this could become an Australasia exhibit with space for wallaby, frilled lizard, kookaburra, but I do feel like this is stretching the space too far and did not include in the mock-up.

African Journey will also undergo a much smaller renovation. The existing colobus monkey exhibit will be expanded to act as a permanent holding area, with Allen's swamp monkeys added to the mix. The outdoor waterhole will see Mountain Zebra added to replace the outgoing Grevy's and ostrich moved back in as well. I want to speculate the waterhole could probably accept an additional antelope species but I don't know what wuld be most appropriate and/or likely. An additional outdoor/indoor primate exhibit, ideally for Debrazza's monkey, is probably too difficult to include, unfortunately.
The zoo was ahead of me on some of this -- the atrium has held Diana Monkey instead of Colobus for years, with spoonbill and stork in free-flight. I would not change that lovely spot. The waterhole has Plains zebra. I would still like to see ostrich and some kind of antelope/gazelle brought into the space.

Pepper Family Wildlife Center will have open space where the red panda and snow leopard are currently. I am unsure how to best fill the space. I did mention serval in my previous post but I am unsure.

Helen Brach Primate House will be renovated next into a neotropical building, though there are still significant space limitations. I am cautious as I am unsure how much space would be available for redevelopment and am unsure which species can be mixed freely and which may need to be separated. The howler monkeys, tamarins, sloth, and titis will be joined by the white-faced saki, spectacled caiman, and golden-headed tamarin from Small Mammal-Reptile House. Spider monkey, squirrel monkey, tamandua, capybara and agouti all seem like they could be sourced and added to the exhibit relatively easily and possibly mixed. There would be birds but I am unsure who would mix where. Toucan or Macaw would likely need their own habitat. The exhibit would need a carnivore and I think the best species that could risk staying indoors is an ocelot. As much as it would be nice to see jaguar, peccary, tapir or anteater return to the collection I am too doubtful the space would allow for any of those without compromising the welfare of either the primates or the larger animal. I think the spider monkeys would be the first guaranteed outdoor access.
With fresh eyes on the building, it is both easier and harder to speculate. My growing concern is limiting the animals that can be held without skylights, but I am unsure if the building could be renovated to accomodate as such.

The best possible renovation in my mind to convert to a neotropical bulding could involve a large mixed exhibit including the existing titi, black howler, callimoco, white-faked saki, golden-headed lion tamarin, pied tamarin, and sloth, adding squirrel monkey, agouti, capybara, red-footed tortoise, and tamandua to the same mixed space, now taking up the combined footprint of multiple existing habitats. A separate indoor/outdoor exhibit includes spider monkey specifically, where the current gibbon enclosure is, and additional indoor exhibits feature spectacled caiman, prehensile-tailed porcupine/armadillo, a macaw species, toucan, and if still possible, ocelot. There are a number of new species present here, of course, all fairly easily acquired.

Unfortunately, the debrazza monkeys, colobus monkeys, and swamp monkeys will likely be phased out as a result. I love these species but there is no room in African Journey - perhaps a mix with the Diana monkey, but there is likely not enough space - and geographic theming is a priority here.

After all of the above renovations are complete, Small Mammal-Reptile House - with the otters, caiman, tamarins, loris, and so forth gone, will be redeveloped and expanded. The nocturnal gallery room will remain most similar though I would hope we could make the terrariums a little larger... and while some of the day area will remain, new rooms will be added as well. One addition will be a Madagascar room including crowned lemurs, madagascar boa, hissing cockroach and orb spiders, as well as a small Australia room including wallabies and frilled lizard. Komodo Dragon will be included as a new star species. I do feel the otter and caiman both leave aquatic niches to fill as well but not sure what best suit that role. I'd say to add a small predatory mammal of some kind as well but small carnivores suffer from so little institutional interest it feels worthless to even entertain the idea.
Small Mammal-Reptile House has now had two monkeys moved out, otters, caiman, tortoise, shrew, loris, procupine, armadillo... there are now six mammals left (bettong, mouse, bushbaby, mole rat, bat, mongoose) with space for more. Crowned lemur will be kept here instead from now on, as lemurs are too big a category imo to ignore. The former porcupine/armadillo nocturnal exhibit will be home for a new nocturnal species -- fennec fox definitely seems one of the easiest to acquire off my head and has a history at the zoo. I think echidna might be another good choice as we could use more Australian life. The shrew exhibit could go to prevost squirrel. The loris exhibit is hard; there aren't many arboreal nocturnal animals that seem easy to acquire for a smaller space.

The caiman and otter exhibits are again more difficult to figure out. Perhaps dwarf caiman can return instead, or spectacled can remain here and dwarf caiman placed in the neotropical building. The zoo is a recent holder for such caiman. The otters currently have two exhibits, one aquatic and one dry but it looks possible to make it aquatic, I have no clue for those spaces.

None of the above is based on the idea of an extensive renovation so much as placing animals in current exhibits -- if more renovation is possible or more space, it will absolutely be an Australia room with wallaby, frilled lizard, and hopefully a few more smaller animals. This is even more crucial with the fact the zoo will no longer have red kangaroo in this plan, so a macropod space is absolutely necessary.

(I am being selfish here. In many ways it probably makes much more practical sense to develop Small Mammal-Reptile House into a neotropical building instead, but the loss of the reptile collection would be much more profound than moving around a few monkeys, and I'd like to keep fennecs, bush babies, and bats around.)
This sounds very unlike me, but I did consider the possibility of kicking out the mammals and doubling down on making it a Reptile House (with parrots, amphibians and insects) but the mole rat display is unique, bats are an abc species, and I am fond of the mongoose and bush baby.

So overall between these proposals, we would hopefully lose very few species (Grevy's Zebra, Chacoan peccary, Red kangaroo, Debrazza's Monkey) while gaining around twenty species, with the loss of the peccary the only one that I feel isn't accounted for by one of the new additions.
My body count has increased.. we lose Grevy's Zebra, Debrazza's Monkey, Colobus Monkey, Allen's Swamp Monkey, Red Kangaroo, Chacoan Peccary, and possibly Patagonian Mara... but we gain Malayan tapir, Orangutan, Siberian tiger, Chinese alligator, Amur leopard, an antelope or gazelle, Agouti, Tamandua, Capybara, Squirrel Monkey, Spider Monkey, macaw, toucan, possibly Ocelot, Fennec Fox, Prevost Squirrel, and ideally some kind of macropod, possibly an additional Australian species.
 
I have visited Lincoln Park Zoo three times since my previous post, giving me some additional insight into my own proposals:


After visiting in person and doing some ugly map mock-ups I can think about this with more specifics.

The current ungulate barn will be dismantled and a new building similar in size and exterior style to Primate House will replace it. The indoor exhibit will include small mammals, birds and herps including northern tree shrew, pygmy slow loris, bali myna, chinese alligator, and burmese python. Asian small-clawed otters, red panda, and francois langurs will have indoor/outdoor access. Four of the existing yards will remain for hoofstock, retaining camel, takin, and milu/deer, though modifications will be made to fit these species better. A fourth exhibit will be set for a new animal, the Malayan tapir, with a large pool and underwater viewing.

The remaining outdoor yards will be modified in places to allow for habitats for returning Siberian tiger and Amur leopard, and a new Snow leopard habitat.

An additional new species will be included, -- an exhibit similar to the meshed chimpanzee habitat will be consructed on one side of the building to house a meshed mixed gibbon-orangutan exhibit.

The area is four acres, and Milwaukee's current elephant exhibit is an acre and a half I'm told, so it's possible this area could be modified to include elephants, but for my current mock-up I chose to exclude them, and the thought of introducing tapir and orangutan is pretty exciting.

rKXo2Lg.png

I neglected to figure out exactly where to place the doors and I did not think too hard about dividing the lines for the cat exhibits, and I'm very bad at drawing silhouettes.

As a further last-ditch plan if I cannot find space for Australian animals in Small Mammal-Reptile House (see below) this could become an Australasia exhibit with space for wallaby, frilled lizard, kookaburra, but I do feel like this is stretching the space too far and did not include in the mock-up.


The zoo was ahead of me on some of this -- the atrium has held Diana Monkey instead of Colobus for years, with spoonbill and stork in free-flight. I would not change that lovely spot. The waterhole has Plains zebra. I would still like to see ostrich and some kind of antelope/gazelle brought into the space.

Pepper Family Wildlife Center will have open space where the red panda and snow leopard are currently. I am unsure how to best fill the space. I did mention serval in my previous post but I am unsure.


With fresh eyes on the building, it is both easier and harder to speculate. My growing concern is limiting the animals that can be held without skylights, but I am unsure if the building could be renovated to accomodate as such.

The best possible renovation in my mind to convert to a neotropical bulding could involve a large mixed exhibit including the existing titi, black howler, callimoco, white-faked saki, golden-headed lion tamarin, pied tamarin, and sloth, adding squirrel monkey, agouti, capybara, red-footed tortoise, and tamandua to the same mixed space, now taking up the combined footprint of multiple existing habitats. A separate indoor/outdoor exhibit includes spider monkey specifically, where the current gibbon enclosure is, and additional indoor exhibits feature spectacled caiman, prehensile-tailed porcupine/armadillo, a macaw species, toucan, and if still possible, ocelot. There are a number of new species present here, of course, all fairly easily acquired.

Unfortunately, the debrazza monkeys, colobus monkeys, and swamp monkeys will likely be phased out as a result. I love these species but there is no room in African Journey - perhaps a mix with the Diana monkey, but there is likely not enough space - and geographic theming is a priority here.


Small Mammal-Reptile House has now had two monkeys moved out, otters, caiman, tortoise, shrew, loris, procupine, armadillo... there are now six mammals left (bettong, mouse, bushbaby, mole rat, bat, mongoose) with space for more. Crowned lemur will be kept here instead from now on, as lemurs are too big a category imo to ignore. The former porcupine/armadillo nocturnal exhibit will be home for a new nocturnal species -- fennec fox definitely seems one of the easiest to acquire off my head and has a history at the zoo. I think echidna might be another good choice as we could use more Australian life. The shrew exhibit could go to prevost squirrel. The loris exhibit is hard; there aren't many arboreal nocturnal animals that seem easy to acquire for a smaller space.

The caiman and otter exhibits are again more difficult to figure out. Perhaps dwarf caiman can return instead, or spectacled can remain here and dwarf caiman placed in the neotropical building. The zoo is a recent holder for such caiman. The otters currently have two exhibits, one aquatic and one dry but it looks possible to make it aquatic, I have no clue for those spaces.

None of the above is based on the idea of an extensive renovation so much as placing animals in current exhibits -- if more renovation is possible or more space, it will absolutely be an Australia room with wallaby, frilled lizard, and hopefully a few more smaller animals. This is even more crucial with the fact the zoo will no longer have red kangaroo in this plan, so a macropod space is absolutely necessary.


This sounds very unlike me, but I did consider the possibility of kicking out the mammals and doubling down on making it a Reptile House (with parrots, amphibians and insects) but the mole rat display is unique, bats are an abc species, and I am fond of the mongoose and bush baby.


My body count has increased.. we lose Grevy's Zebra, Debrazza's Monkey, Colobus Monkey, Allen's Swamp Monkey, Red Kangaroo, Chacoan Peccary, and possibly Patagonian Mara... but we gain Malayan tapir, Orangutan, Siberian tiger, Chinese alligator, Amur leopard, an antelope or gazelle, Agouti, Tamandua, Capybara, Squirrel Monkey, Spider Monkey, macaw, toucan, possibly Ocelot, Fennec Fox, Prevost Squirrel, and ideally some kind of macropod, possibly an additional Australian species.
That would be interesting. Maybe they could add Speke's gazelles to the watering hole exhibit too?
 
Back
Top