EEP / SSP transfers
There is no risk for breeding two "subspecies" are there is no active selection, and both subpopulations have a huge number of founders.
Thanks to everyone who replied on that subject. Your arguments helped me to better understand the situation. One of my points was "why Australia et al, but not America" - but the keyword here is sustainable population, as someone pointed out.
When mentioning "two subspecies" I was being polemic. Of course I don't think that will ever happen.
Now I have one more question, or argument in favour of an exchange: Put the case that an individual X is "not happy" in its group and needs to change into a group Y
with special characteristics / requirements in terms of social structure, e.g. a laid-back silverback, supportive females, a potential surrogate mother. A "specially tailored" group, so to speak, which isn't that easy to find. Now what if there is no such group in the EEP, but in the SSP there is (or vice versa)? That means bad luck for X, doesn't it? And the reasons would be logistic ones only - too much paperwork, too expensive etc.
So while there is no problem as far as genetic sustainability is concerned, there is a possible, deliberate restriction in options when it comes to the welfare of an individual. Just as an example: Would the EEP insist on castrating gorillas if America were "next door" and willing to take surplus males? Maybe yes as America might say, We've solved our surplus males issue, please solve yours yourself. But you know what I mean. It's a question of feeling committed to collaboration, or not. And I can't see that commitment, or its necessary preconditions, between the SSP and EEP.
Sorry for my musings
