The funny thing is that studbookkeepers are often accused to manage the population from their desk and from behind a computer, but if they do not do so and choose that social competences, individual needs, logistics or character are more important than genetics, they are accused of bad management!
I would always choose the former method over the latter. Obviously some thought needs to be given to temperament, background, compatability etc also, but I rarely have any gripe with decisions made by studbook keepers. I know what a difficult juggling act they have, and with more than a little 'zoo politics' to deal with too. I usually have all respect for their work. Just occassionally a bad decision seems to be made but not often.