HelloCrossy67
Well-Known Member
Oh god, that's terrible. It's been a rough year for Carnivores at Marwell. Thoughts with the keepers as always, she was always a character and a beautiful animal.
Terrible news. Thoughts with the keepers.
Did Pasha have any history of attacks?
Seems almost a 50-50 chance with tigers unfortunately - either complete success or perhaps complete failure! The only certainty is that you dont have babies unless you try.That’s awful news.
ALL of that is perfectly normal tiger behaviour - males would never stay together and minor injuries happen all the time. None of these are reasons for not breeding from him.Awful news
but I’m not surprised given his history at port lympne safari park
He was agressive towards his brother that’s why they ended up split and he was in with both sisters at some point (girls was separated ofc ) and both of them he kept being aggressive towards n caused some minor injuries.
He is a lovely boy but I think a solitary life is what he needs now
Quite.A sad incident and it must be hard on the keepers having to see that and deal with the aftermath as well as for the poor tiger suffering a fatal injury. A real challenge to mix these cats and devastating when it goes wrong, but the zoo obviously tried to manage the risk as best they could.
Seems almost a 50-50 chance with tigers unfortunately - either complete success or perhaps complete failure! The only certainty is that you dont have babies unless you try.
There is not much staff can do to intervene, especially if the introduction is out in the main paddock, which the new law says all big cats must have 24-hour permanent access to.
What is the actual success rate for these introductions? a 50% fatality rate would be extraordinary!
What is the actual success rate for these introductions? a 50% fatality rate would be extraordinary!
especially if the introduction is out in the main paddock, which the new law says all big cats must have 24-hour permanent access to. That is not what the new law says. Firstly the law states (my underlining) that permanent access at "all times" is "Where the animal requires access to both indoor and outdoor enclosures to meet the welfare needs..." Secondly there are a number of circumstances when access to (either) indoor or outdoor enclosures can be restricted, these includes during the introduction of new animals, and during breeding.Seems almost a 50-50 chance with tigers unfortunately - either complete success or perhaps complete failure! The only certainty is that you dont have babies unless you try.
There is not much staff can do to intervene, especially if the introduction is out in the main paddock, which the new law says all big cats must have 24-hour permanent access to.
What you have copied seems so vague and gives so many caveats that it was hardly worth putting into print. Lets hope it is implemented with fairness by every team of inspectors.especially if the introduction is out in the main paddock, which the new law says all big cats must have 24-hour permanent access to. That is not what the new law says. Firstly the law states (my underlining) that permanent access at "all times" is "Where the animal requires access to both indoor and outdoor enclosures to meet the welfare needs..." Secondly there are a number of circumstances when access to (either) indoor or outdoor enclosures can be restricted, these includes during the introduction of new animals, and during breeding.
You are quite right and I did not mean a literal percentage split, like a UK general election perhaps. I was emphasising that it is a highly uncertain business and the outcome is pretty much pot-luck. The figures given by Zoofan15 indicate that it can be done with more success and I stand corrected. Perhaps the UK zoos should take a close look at how it is done 'properly'?What is the actual success rate for these introductions? a 50% fatality rate would be extraordinary!
Perhaps the UK zoos should take a close look at how it is done 'properly'?