Milwaukee County Zoo Master Plan and Future Renovations

I am both impressed with the ambition of converting so much of the existing zoo to themed areas and expanding spaces for existing and deserving species, but I'm also disappointed by how much of it feels more like a redress that's removing some of the more interesting species and habitats already there - the tree kangaroos, creatures of the night, etc. I have very mixed feelings on the predator/prey panoramas being discarded as well. (Seems necessary and overdue but it's also one of those things that's always been a part of the zoo's character.)

I understand there's not the funding for Milwaukee to get too crazy, but it's a shame that The Jungle is basically the primate habitat renovation, and the Asian Trail is basically a mild big cat renovation, is what I'm getting at here, when it could be satisfying to introduce more new species that fit those areas. Thus why "Escape to the Islands" sounds so fascinating to me - it feels much more like a fully-formed idea, compared to "Asian Trail" which feels like a new coat of paint.

I feel a lot more disappointed now that I never revisited Australia before it was discarded for the improved Elephant habitat, that's for sure. Good thing I like elephants?
 
I have seen the allusive mink one time in my 10+ years of visiting the zoo :p
Lets be real here, is the mink really there? ;) I have never seen that thing for all my years of visiting.
American Minks are very elusive creatures. I have no doubt that a mink lives on Macaque Island. There is a pond I have been walking past for years (ever since I was a toddler), and only recently learned a family of minks lives there. The reason the zoo has a mink there is because a wild one used to live in the area. When it died, they added the species to the exhibit. I am assuming they would do this again if the current animal dies. So, really, the question is, how many minks have been on that island through the hundred years the zoo has been open? How many were wild? How many were zoo owned?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVM
As I continue to work my way through the master plan it appears that once elephants are done, then the hippos, and finally the rhinos. Once Adventure Africa is completed we know that they will be shifting focus to Alaskan Coast. Here the first exhibit up will be the sea lions as part of phase 1, if things stick to the relative plan.

With Lilly, I believe now becoming the oldest polar bear in US zoos, I’m not sure if sea lions would stay as the first phase of Alaskan Coast or would they take adventage of her passing in the future and make the polar bear exhibit next.
 
As I continue to work my way through the master plan it appears that once elephants are done, then the hippos, and finally the rhinos. Once Adventure Africa is completed we know that they will be shifting focus to Alaskan Coast. Here the first exhibit up will be the sea lions as part of phase 1, if things stick to the relative plan.

With Lilly, I believe now becoming the oldest polar bear in US zoos, I’m not sure if sea lions would stay as the first phase of Alaskan Coast or would they take adventage of her passing in the future and make the polar bear exhibit next.
her name is Snow Lilly
 
I’ll make a more detailed “rant” in a little bit, but let me just say that I am very upset about that Australian Exhibit.
To elaborate...

I don't mind the African and Asian exhibits getting removed, It's a little unfortunate but new African and Asian exhibits are still on the way. However, I am so upset over this Australian exhibit not becoming reality. I mean, tree kangaroos, koalas, blue penguins, wombats and a nocturnal house plus a kangaroo and emu walkabout. There was potential for one of the greatest Australian exhibits in the states, but no. Instead we get a small field for kangaroos and a kiddie splash pad in a glorified farm. If the farm became this "Adventure Down Under" I would be ecstatic! Ah well, maybe one day these plans will be brought back and realized.
 
To elaborate...

I don't mind the African and Asian exhibits getting removed, It's a little unfortunate but new African and Asian exhibits are still on the way. However, I am so upset over this Australian exhibit not becoming reality. I mean, tree kangaroos, koalas, blue penguins, wombats and a nocturnal house plus a kangaroo and emu walkabout. There was potential for one of the greatest Australian exhibits in the states, but no. Instead we get a small field for kangaroos and a kiddie splash pad in a glorified farm. If the farm became this "Adventure Down Under" I would be ecstatic! Ah well, maybe one day these plans will be brought back and realized.

Oh my God. If I wasn't so abundantly aware zoogoing was a privilege and a luxury, and one I am likely going to need to taper off for a period right now, I might be actually upset.

This exhibit sounds like an absolute dream come true - the return of the tree kangaroos, the unexpected grand return of koalas and even fairy penguins? Plus wombats, which I've seen before but aren't super common in captivity? A nocturnal house? It sounds like a fantastic space with a variety of species and a much more accurate image of Australia than any zoos offer. It also seems like it manages to offer a lot of things to see and do in a footprint that doesn't feel too massive and daunting.

It's an absolute shame the financial backing and incentive seem to be absent for such a splendid project. I can only hope that should Milwaukee come into some money in the future, it may come back into consideration - although with the luck of zoos over the last ten years in this area, I'm sure it'll take them another decade to get through Adventure Africa.
 
To elaborate...

I don't mind the African and Asian exhibits getting removed, It's a little unfortunate but new African and Asian exhibits are still on the way. However, I am so upset over this Australian exhibit not becoming reality. I mean, tree kangaroos, koalas, blue penguins, wombats and a nocturnal house plus a kangaroo and emu walkabout. There was potential for one of the greatest Australian exhibits in the states, but no. Instead we get a small field for kangaroos and a kiddie splash pad in a glorified farm. If the farm became this "Adventure Down Under" I would be ecstatic! Ah well, maybe one day these plans will be brought back and realized.
I’ve been thinking about this lately and I’ve been wondering how dead this idea may actually be? I mean yes it’s currently in the eliminated exhibits portion of the master plan but there’s several reason for me to think it may not be as dead.

First of all this one seems to have the most detail with even a diagram attached. This has to mean it was close to being green lighted. The second thing is that last year the zoo president reference that Australia may not be a gone project as people may think. Which it could be taken two ways, either in the kids area or possible a form of Australia exhibit like this one. Lastly, I feel that if the zoo were to have kangaroo walkabout they might have gone and built that already. The reason I say that is that the area is pretty much vacated already, although it has a small pop of food service that could be easily moved somewhere else.

These couple things leads me to believe or maybe hope that there may be a larger version of Australia coming then just a walk about area in the kids zone.
 
I’ve been thinking about this lately and I’ve been wondering how dead this idea may actually be? I mean yes it’s currently in the eliminated exhibits portion of the master plan but there’s several reason for me to think it may not be as dead.

First of all this one seems to have the most detail with even a diagram attached. This has to mean it was close to being green lighted. The second thing is that last year the zoo president reference that Australia may not be a gone project as people may think. Which it could be taken two ways, either in the kids area or possible a form of Australia exhibit like this one. Lastly, I feel that if the zoo were to have kangaroo walkabout they might have gone and built that already. The reason I say that is that the area is pretty much vacated already, although it has a small pop of food service that could be easily moved somewhere else.

These couple things leads me to believe or maybe hope that there may be a larger version of Australia coming then just a walk about area in the kids zone.

Agreed. I mean even looking at how the Caribbean Cove idea from the mid 1980s was brought back with Escape to the Islands. It may be a decade or two before Milwaukee gets a real Australian exhibit back but I have faith that we will. It's not like the zoo will be out of room to expand/add even after this master plan is completed.
 
Agreed. I mean even looking at how the Caribbean Cove idea from the mid 1980s was brought back with Escape to the Islands. It may be a decade or two before Milwaukee gets a real Australian exhibit back but I have faith that we will. It's not like the zoo will be out of room to expand/add even after this master plan is completed.
I agree, however one thing that seems to a item that they are trying to keep is the wooded nature aspect to the zoo. Even in the master plan they say that this is an asset to the zoo and that they should do as little to remove the woodedness as possible. Which makes sense when you think about how they are expanding in the upper area. Most of the projects are doing little to disturb the forested areas.

That being said where to place the Australian area with that in mind and current projected layouts, that’s the question at the moment.
 
I've always had mixed feelings on the way the Milwaukee Zoo feels so much like you're in the wilderness - l it adds a lot to its unique charm and character, like the predator/prey aspect of the zoo, and of course any zoo should be reflective of nature. On the other hand, it makes getting around the zoo a lot more difficult, and you can get tired moving across large spaces between the large exhibits.

Still, looking over the revised map there's still a clear belt of space in the middle of the facility, and this offers room for some less constrained expansion. A very easy project could be an additional North American exhibit of some kind between Wild Woods and Gulf Coast to anchor the region as distinctly themed around the continent. I'm not sure what species might be appropriate without looking back over the plan though.

The prime real estate on my mind though, is above Asian Trail and the Farm and below Primate Jungle - an empty area between several existing facilities. I'm not sure if the scale is proper, but that seems like a solid place to put the Australian exhibit we've been discussing, for example. A smaller version would probably still be better than a basic walkabout.

There could even be a little space left below the Islands and the Jungle towards the Asian Trail, which might be a good place for a few species from the Southeast Asian islands. Use that empty corridor to place something that could connect with the Orangutans and the Tigers.
 
Another issue the zoo has with expansion is the train tracks. The tracks could just be moved elsewhere and change the train's course, but it would mean that the train would have to be closed during that time, and I am not sure how much it would cost to move the tracks.
 
I've always had mixed feelings on the way the Milwaukee Zoo feels so much like you're in the wilderness - l it adds a lot to its unique charm and character, like the predator/prey aspect of the zoo, and of course any zoo should be reflective of nature. On the other hand, it makes getting around the zoo a lot more difficult, and you can get tired moving across large spaces between the large exhibits.

Still, looking over the revised map there's still a clear belt of space in the middle of the facility, and this offers room for some less constrained expansion. A very easy project could be an additional North American exhibit of some kind between Wild Woods and Gulf Coast to anchor the region as distinctly themed around the continent. I'm not sure what species might be appropriate without looking back over the plan though.

The prime real estate on my mind though, is above Asian Trail and the Farm and below Primate Jungle - an empty area between several existing facilities. I'm not sure if the scale is proper, but that seems like a solid place to put the Australian exhibit we've been discussing, for example. A smaller version would probably still be better than a basic walkabout.

There could even be a little space left below the Islands and the Jungle towards the Asian Trail, which might be a good place for a few species from the Southeast Asian islands. Use that empty corridor to place something that could connect with the Orangutans and the Tigers.
One thing though that I think is helpful with all the trees is that they help block some of the sound that the freeway generates. Going there in the winter I can speak to how loud it is and makes it feel less like a park.
 
Its been awhile since finally getting to see the master plan and as the summer is unofficially over its time to start looking at next year in the master plan of things. With construction well underway and the hoof stock area looking like its nearing completion. What's next for the zoo? I think we are all pretty aware that the zoos focus for the next couple of years is the hippos next and the rhinos after that. Looking past that things seem to be grim of sorts. With the zoo notifying the county that they projecting at least $240K deficit this year, and with deficits the previous years, are they in a good place to keep going with the master plan?

Honestly, I am not sure at the moment. Something needs to change at the zoo to draw in the crowds again more then just the couple of months during the summer. This is addressed partially in the new master plan, but vaguely. Looking at other zoos in the area, they have different things going on through out the year. One of the things I feel should be looked at is doing something during the holiday season. Like a festival of lights or something along those lines. I understand that they will be getting a bump in attendance once the first phase of construction is complete but looking at what they are now putting in their 5 year projects, they are pushing back Alaska Gold Coast area. Instead they are opting to go with more lower hanging fruit items that really don't need public support to be completed. Talking about new way to get into the zoo (like the west entrance), new welcome area, and a expanded penguin exhibit/zoomobile area.

The reason why I am concerned, granted I am looking from the outside and not knowing all the components to what is going on, is just looking at this first phase of the Adventure Africa. They were suppose to have the ability for mixed species with the elephants. Something completely not normally seen at zoos. Instead citing budget costs they decided to cut that component out. Yet they are still building in that ability some time in the near future. Wouldn't it makes sense to do it all at once thats logistically trying to figure it out later. That's one of my fears for this new Window to the Wild campaign, yes they are making steps to update the zoo, and yes I know a master plan is a guiding tool and not something written in stone. But, if you are working on a plan to to have all these animals together but your cutting it out, and claiming to come back to it later, and dealing with deficits/budget cuts over the years, wouldn't it make sense to maybe throw a Hail Mary to see if it helps the zoo. Thats not to say the zoo is in sort of danger of shutting down anytime soon, but isn't time to start thinking outside the box and creatively with year over year deficits?

Changing directions just a bit...
I've always had mixed feelings on the way the Milwaukee Zoo feels so much like you're in the wilderness - l it adds a lot to its unique charm and character, like the predator/prey aspect of the zoo, and of course any zoo should be reflective of nature. On the other hand, it makes getting around the zoo a lot more difficult, and you can get tired moving across large spaces between the large exhibits.

Still, looking over the revised map there's still a clear belt of space in the middle of the facility, and this offers room for some less constrained expansion. A very easy project could be an additional North American exhibit of some kind between Wild Woods and Gulf Coast to anchor the region as distinctly themed around the continent. I'm not sure what species might be appropriate without looking back over the plan though.

The prime real estate on my mind though, is above Asian Trail and the Farm and below Primate Jungle - an empty area between several existing facilities. I'm not sure if the scale is proper, but that seems like a solid place to put the Australian exhibit we've been discussing, for example. A smaller version would probably still be better than a basic walkabout.

There could even be a little space left below the Islands and the Jungle towards the Asian Trail, which might be a good place for a few species from the Southeast Asian islands. Use that empty corridor to place something that could connect with the Orangutans and the Tigers.

Another issue the zoo has with expansion is the train tracks. The tracks could just be moved elsewhere and change the train's course, but it would mean that the train would have to be closed during that time, and I am not sure how much it would cost to move the tracks.
One of the assets the zoo has that makes it different then most zoo is the park like setting. The zoo prides itself on feeling like the woods and escape from the hustle and bustle of the city life around it. The area that kind forms a belt in the middle of the zoo kinda forms a separation between upper half and lower half of the zoo. As much as I would agree there is potential for the zoo to use that as expansion area, it also seems like it would loose some of its character and charm. I feel like if anything would go there it should be service roads, because I am constantly jumping out of the way as vehicle after vehicle nearly run into me. Theres just to much traffic of vehicles going on at the zoo. Which also leads me into possibly moving the railroad, while it may cost a couple of thousands of dollars to move, part of the history of the railroad at the zoo was that it was the first thing built there before any exhibits. People could come and take the train around the zoo and watch the construction happen. Not only that but some of the exhibits, it gives you a behind the scenes tour. As much as I would like to see the zoo go about expanding into some of these wooded areas or moving the railroad, I have had to reflect on the past, understand what the zoo is, and where it may be heading with direction/message into the future. As of right now I don't think the zoo really should be cutting into that green built that much or expanding into the green areas that much. They have a large areas that could be adjusted to better suit the animals and the public before they start expanding into those areas.
 
But, if you are working on a plan to to have all these animals together but your cutting it out, and claiming to come back to it later, and dealing with deficits/budget cuts over the years, wouldn't it make sense to maybe throw a Hail Mary to see if it helps the zoo.
This is how I am feeling right now. The basic renovations are financially sensible but are also far less likely to bring in significant amounts of new visitors in the long term to improve funding for next time. The most ambitious ideas always end up getting walked back, but those are often (but never always) the ones most likely to draw new people in. They need something fresh to bring people in who are not coming to the zoo right now -- and my experience is, no matter how much existing species need renovations, a new habitat for something already on exhibit doesn't draw people in as much as something new. That doesn't mean I think Milwaukee can afford that investment.

I am not optimistic about the future of Milwaukee (or Brookfield) right now.
 
This is how I am feeling right now. The basic renovations are financially sensible but are also far less likely to bring in significant amounts of new visitors in the long term to improve funding for next time. The most ambitious ideas always end up getting walked back, but those are often (but never always) the ones most likely to draw new people in. They need something fresh to bring people in who are not coming to the zoo right now -- and my experience is, no matter how much existing species need renovations, a new habitat for something already on exhibit doesn't draw people in as much as something new. That doesn't mean I think Milwaukee can afford that investment.

I am not optimistic about the future of Milwaukee (or Brookfield) right now.
I really wish that there would be a change of guard at the zoo. The current director has been there for several of the most recent capital campaigns and although they have been good, I feel like we need someone new that is willing to take risks and try something different. Milwaukee has a rich history and I feel like much of that history people keep living in. We need someone to come in and create that new history that we can look back on and think about the those good ole days. Milwaukee's potential is great, we need someone to tap into that potential.

The previous renovations have been small, and in my opinion not the greatest. The one that comes to mind is the Big Cat Country. The exhibits are too small, and don't provide what the animals need. The lions are suppose to live in a pride but they are separated and live in small groups (although that may change now). The cheetahs were suppose to be where the serval is now and they realized that the cheetahs didn't like the enclosure so now they spend most of their time outside. When asked if they will ever breed cheetahs at the zoo, I was told no because they don't have big enough space for breeding them. Overall, this is just one example of the zoo renovations that seem big at the time but then is kinda a dud.

With the zoo working on transforming itself this time around, I am trying to hold out hope but at the same time its the same people who have been in charge that have made modest changes over the years. Who have spent large amounts of money on projects that are hardly in use (Lakeview Cafe). The zoo has been mentioning how they aren't drawing in the crowds that they have been wanting to draw in but yet there needs to be a reason for people to come, schools to plan trips, colleges to include courses, etc. Recently, I feel like there hasn't really been this drive.

Even though they are building this new exhibit there just doesn't seem to be excitement, everything just seems eh... Call me crazy but I would be showcasing that off like crazy, having a weekly construction update, showing whats going on, telling how people can get involved. Yet there is none of that, its just occasionally an update from various sources. Get out there and promote what the zoo is doing. Even with what they are doing with conservation efforts, trying to see it around the zoo is hard to see, with on exception, the bonobos, but even that hasn't been updated since they first opened the Family Apes building.

Again, I know many of us know this, but it would be nice to start to see the zoo reinvest in itself and try something bold and fully commit to that boldness!
 
Back
Top