johnstoni
Well-Known Member
I always go on about this, but if an animal has never known a vast enclosure, its one thing to send it on to another small zoo environment, but if it was born in one of the biggest enclosures for that species anywhere, I think you have to consider the impact of moving it on to a smaller facility.
Not just with bears, I mean every time I watch the Longleat show and see young sealions being rounded up to move on to, say, Blair Drummond, I wonder why this kind of facility can't source its animals from simlar blue-paint-and-concrete auditorium-style establishments. And when London opened its Australia exhibit on the Mappins, I think bringing 20 wallabies from virtually free-roaming at Whipsnade should have been avoided when there are plenty of places with small enclosures in the UK they could have obtained wallabies from, and given them an improved, not reduced, quality of life IMO.
Not just with bears, I mean every time I watch the Longleat show and see young sealions being rounded up to move on to, say, Blair Drummond, I wonder why this kind of facility can't source its animals from simlar blue-paint-and-concrete auditorium-style establishments. And when London opened its Australia exhibit on the Mappins, I think bringing 20 wallabies from virtually free-roaming at Whipsnade should have been avoided when there are plenty of places with small enclosures in the UK they could have obtained wallabies from, and given them an improved, not reduced, quality of life IMO.