The zoo's two Bald Eagles (kept bts for the bird show) have died from avian flu.
As I stated on the Bird Flu thread, this could be potentially catastrophic for Milwaukee's bird collection depending on how the Wisconsin state vets and the USDA decide to handle the situation. They could very well be asked to depopulate the entire bird collection. This will set the precedent for how positive cases in collection animals are handled in other facilities moving forward.The zoo's two Bald Eagles (kept bts for the bird show) have died from avian flu.
Do they have any high value/endangered/rare species that this would be catastrophic to the SSPs for?As I stated on the Bird Flu thread, this could be potentially catastrophic for Milwaukee's bird collection depending on how the Wisconsin state vets and the USDA decide to handle the situation. They could very well be asked to depopulate the entire bird collection. This will set the precedent for how positive cases in collection animals are handled in other facilities moving forward.
Here is a full list of the bird SSPs the zoo is involved with. I'm not sure this will be detrimental to any one population, but as a whole could be a serious issue.Do they have any high value/endangered/rare species that this would be catastrophic to the SSPs for?
I don't believe that the zoo would have to depopulate the entire bird collection. The 2 bald eagles were part of the bird show, which is a different area of the zoo than the majority of the exhibit birds. I don't think the two areas are cared for by the same department so there shouldn't be a big concern with cross-contamination or spreading the flu between the bird show and Aviary building. I hope not anyway.As I stated on the Bird Flu thread, this could be potentially catastrophic for Milwaukee's bird collection depending on how the Wisconsin state vets and the USDA decide to handle the situation. They could very well be asked to depopulate the entire bird collection. This will set the precedent for how positive cases in collection animals are handled in other facilities moving forward.
While this might very well be the case, as it often is at many facilities, the fate of the birds is ultimately at the determination of the state vets and the USDA and what they determine the threat level to be to the wider wild bird population and ultimately the poultry industry.I don't believe that the zoo would have to depopulate the entire bird collection. The 2 bald eagles were part of the bird show, which is a different area of the zoo than the majority of the exhibit birds. I don't think the two areas are cared for by the same department so there shouldn't be a big concern with cross-contamination or spreading the flu between the bird show and Aviary building. I hope not anyway.
The odds of this are incredible, but I actually have the exact same guidebook. It's interesting to note that minus the Adventure Africa exhibits and the otter exhibit, much of what is in the book still exists almost identical today. On the other hand, the collection was just plain ridiculous and it was quite the shocker during my first read through. Giant pangolins, Amazon river dolphins and proboscis monkeys all in the same zoo sounds like something an adolescent ZooChatter would have put in the old fantasy zoo forums. To think there was actually a time when it was a reality is really something to behold.I just uploaded some photos of an official guidebook from the zoo that was published in 1973. I thought someone made a comment on this thread regarding a picture of Humboldt penguins sharing a pool with tapirs, and another asking for pictures of the guidebook but I cannot find those comments now.
In any case, it's very interesting looking at pictures taken of the zoo just over 10 years after it officially opened- when all the exhibits and buildings were state of the art and brand new. In lots of places, the zoo remains virtually unchanged from the time the guidebook was published. Of course the biggest difference between then and now the zoo collection, and I tried to showcase many of those differences in the pictures I uploaded. The most notable differences in collection are in the zoo's Primate, Small Mammal, and Reptile buildings, as well as the South America yard, Waterhole yard, and Asian animals section; which is almost non-existent compared to today's collection. Animal husbandry and availability has greatly changed in the past 40 years so it is very cool to see just how different the zoo was when it opened.
Milwaukee County Zoo Former Species [Milwaukee County Zoo]Where is the best listing of the former species held at the zoo or does one need to be created.
I can't believe I forgot about that thread
There was a baby just born this past week. The zoo hasn’t announced anything just yet, but they typically don’t for a bit. Maybe within the next week or two they will.Does anyone know anything about a new(ish) baby Japanese macaque? There was this video posted to the MCZ Youtube on Mar 1 but no others mentions of a baby macaque in the news or on their other social media. It would not surprise me if there is a new baby considering there has been a baby every year since 2019, with Daisuki, Nikko, and Kumo.
Exciting! But that would be a different baby than the one in the video? Unless the video is an old one of Daisuki, Nikko, or Kumo. The title of "new macaque baby" makes me think otherwise though.There was a baby just born this past week. The zoo hasn’t announced anything just yet, but they typically don’t for a bit. Maybe within the next week or two they will.
Different species, though.looks like cuttlefish are back in the ARC
Milwaukee County Zoo - Dwarf cuttlefish | Facebook