Minnesota Zoo Minnesota Zoo News

@reduakari: you brought up the San Francisco Zoo gorilla exhibit, and I have to agree with your assessment. Looking so far down on the apes is awkward, and the height is far too high in many areas. It's amazing how an exhibit that is now almost 30 years old has aged so badly, when at the same time the Woodland Park Zoo's pair of gorilla enclosures actually hold up fairly well.
 
The article mentions a possibility of over $100 million in expenditures, which is difficult to believe considering the current climate towards costly zoo exhibits. I'll be seeing the new $30 million exhibit in the first week of July and will probably post a short review of it here on ZooBeat. I suppose that everything hinges on this year's attendance figures, as the new set of enclosures will surely boost the number of zoo visitors in Minnesota. The more people that come and view grizzly bears, sea otters, european wild boar and amur leopards...the more money in the bank for the expanding zoo.
 
The article mentions a possibility of over $100 million in expenditures, which is difficult to believe considering the current climate towards costly zoo exhibits. I'll be seeing the new $30 million exhibit in the first week of July and will probably post a short review of it here on ZooBeat. I suppose that everything hinges on this year's attendance figures, as the new set of enclosures will surely boost the number of zoo visitors in Minnesota. The more people that come and view grizzly bears, sea otters, european wild boar and amur leopards...the more money in the bank for the expanding zoo.

I took that to be a figure from the current Master Plan rather than an action plan. It took the Director about four years of work with the Governor and the Legislature to get "Russia's Grizzly Coast" funded.

This year's funding - it all comes from the state - was cut to bare bones repairs. They cut out the funds for deferred maintenance (which is to say: they deferred them!) The State also, this year, approved a measure allowing the zoo to use private contributions to help augment the salary of the Director. The State and the Board are thrilled to have him and while he is happy there -as long as new exhibits get funded - he could easily go anywhere he wanted to. They didn't want to risk having him "look around."

I am not sure whether the zoo is allowed to fundraise for exhibits. And gate receipts will never build anything. So - if I am correct - it is all and always a political and State economy issue for them. The present Governor is very supportive of the Zoo, but with the State budget requiring about $850million in bonds this year, he had to line item veto funding for the zoos. He was under a great deal of pressure (this was all in the pres)
 
Exhibit

The Minnesota Zoo's tiger exhibit is called "the largest tiger complex in the United States" by the 2008 book "America's Best Zoos". The Bronx Zoo's 3-acre tiger exhibit must then be a close second. Anyone been to both? Zooplantman and others?
 
Exhibit

The Minnesota Zoo's tiger exhibit is called "the largest tiger complex in the United States" by the 2008 book "America's Best Zoos". The Bronx Zoo's 3-acre tiger exhibit must then be a close second. Anyone been to both? Zooplantman and others?

You're loving that new book, aren't you?

My memory is that Minnesota's TWO tiger exhibits (at different sections of the zoo) are the larger. One is quite big. Bronx's recent (2005?) tiger exhibit(s) are long but not deep. At the Bronx, you view from one (in each exhibit) viewing area, looking up hill. In Minnesota's larger exhibit, you go out on a raised boardwalk and look out and down in all directions.
 
@Zooplantman: when are you going to visit the exhibit that you helped design?
 
Minnesota Zoo Review: July 1st, 2008

My wife took over 300 photos at the zoo today, and I'll probably be posting them towards the end of August once we arrive back from our epic road trip of 20 or more zoos. There is a small chance that I'll post them earlier, but I don't want to spend much time on my laptop when there are zoos out there to see! Hahaha...

"Russia's Grizzly Coast" - is quite simply a superb addition to this interesting zoo. The Central Park Plaza is terrific, with a beautiful fountain, lots of metallic animal figures on the grounds, a gift shop, a covered sitting area, a food cafe, etc. I can see that $5 million was well spent on this portion of the zoo, and on a scorching day there were many kids exploring the mini-waterpark.

An offshoot of the plaza is where the other $25 million was spent, and for the most part it is magnificent. The entrance is full of plaques and various signs instructing the zoo visitors about the importance of conservation in Russia and elsewhere around the world. The walkway is on a soft rubbery floor, and that continues through the first couple of exhibits. The sea otter enclosure is the best that I've ever seen, and a number of zoos and aquariums showcase these delightful otters in North America. There were 4 sea otters all rolling around in their watery exhibit, and the landscape in the background is gorgeous. There is a massive viewing window with plenty of seats, rocky terrain for land, and plenty of toys, rocks and logs in the water for the otters to mess around with. A beautiful exhibit that should be copied in other institutions.

The 3 grizzly bears have another outstanding enclosure, and it is one that will give Seattle's Woodland Park Zoo a run for its money in terms of North America's best grizzly habitat. One of the bears spent the entire 30 minutes that I was there in the water, fishing in vain but splashing around and shaking his head impressively. Another bear was enticed to play with some logs in the background, and every few minutes a geyser of water was shot into the air in the spacious and well-laid out exhibit. The third bear ambled around, dug in the sand pit, and basically ignored the first two bears. It's difficult to tell how far back the habitat goes, but with the large viewing windows, spacious area for visitors and beautifully landscaped backdrop one can almost picture themselves on the Russian coastline! This enclosure is stunning and I have tons of photos to upload to justify my thoughts.

The wild boar enclosure is satisfactory but nothing special. Half of it is covered with a mesh wall (which is awkward) but the second half has no mesh and allows for great photos. The one disappointment of the new exhibits is the trio of amur leopard cages. Two of the leopards were hiding and invisible, and the third leopard could barely be seen at the back of the enclosure. I have no problem with animals being difficult to spot, but all three exhibits are far too small for such powerfully large cats. After the spectacular bear and otter habitats the amur leopards are shown in cages that lack the excitement of the rest of the new enclosures. I couldn't believe the tiny size of the habitats, and that two out of three there is thick, ugly mesh obscuring the vision of people straining their eyes as they search for the elusive leopards.

Northern Trail - the pair of amur tiger enclosures are apparently the largest in North America, and there were 2 tigers in each exhibit. The habitats were set in a heavily wooded forest, with large meadows adjacent to the countless trees. It took quite a bit of skill to actually locate the tigers, and the enclosures were fantastic for the animals. Again, these are older exhibits but nevertheless outstanding.

Many of the paddocks at the Minnesota Zoo are enormous: bison in a 3 acre exhibit, a herd of 5-6 takin in a half-acre paddock, pronghorn antelope had about 2 acres, bactrian camel had 2 acres, mexican gray and timber wolves each had at least an acre, etc. Huge enclosures that brought a smile to my face, as I'm always all over zoos that build exhibits that don't allow their animals room to roam. The bison, camel and moose habitats had huge pools in them, and the musk oxen must have had at least 5 or more acres and a gigantic lake in their enclosure!

Discovery Bay - 4 dolphins in a lacklustre 15-minute show in an aging dolphinarium that was so-so at best. The pools weren't quite big enough for such intelligent animals, and the other aquarium tanks (sharks, fish, seahorses, sea turtles) were underwhelming. My first impression at entering the mammoth building was one of delight, but after the novelty of the facades wore off there was nothing but merely adequate exhibits that have been done far better elsewhere.

Tropics Trail - a large indoor rainforest set of habitats that showcase a surprisingly diverse list of animals. Red pandas mixed with long-horned gorals in a rocky exhibit, a tamandua with armadillos and cotton-top tamarins, clouded leopard, a stinky binturong with a swimming malayan tapir, golden-lion tamarins with agoutis and a sloth, a fishing cat in a puny exhibit, slow loris, pgymy loris, komodo dragon, water monitor, burmese python, flying foxes, tri-coloured squirrels, lemurs, etc. The problem with this section of the zoo is that every single one of the habitats was far too small.

The sun bear indoor grotto is the smallest that I've ever seen for that bear, the red pandas had two trees extremely close to the public to climb on, the fishing cat was in a glass cage that was horribly small, the matschie's tree kangaroos were in an embarrassingly tiny cage, the chevrotains were in a matchbox-sized hole, the ringtailed and red ruffed lemurs were shoved together in a cramped exhibit. The white-cheeked gibbons were languishing in a pretty and yet small (and completely fake) island. Gorgeous animals but in exhibits that were toooo small.

Minnesota Trail - lots of adequate to very nice exhibits for North American animals, in which this zoo specializes in. At least 3 wolverines, 5 fishers (which we didn't see), wolves, coyotes, porcupines, a bald eagle, owls, river otters, beavers, lynx, cougar. All fairly well done.

Overall - the Minnesota Zoo's outdoor exhibits were without question enormous in comparison to many other zoo's enclosures. Even a solitary moose had a half-acre to itself! The hoofstock, tiger, sea otter, grizzly bear, wolves, etc all had some of the largest and most naturalistic exhibits that I've ever seen. Even the Japanese macaques had an ordinary yet fairly large, grassy enclosure that allowed for the troop to spread out in their own space. Many of these habitats would place the zoo in the top echelon of North American zoological collections. At this point I was over the moon with this surprisingly pleasant zoo...BUT...

However, the dolphinarium and small set of aquariums are outdated and not worth much time in exploring. The rainforest set of exhibits is crammed into less than 2 acres, and there are numerous absolutely wonderful species of animals in nothing but tiny cages. The indoor exhibits tainted my overall opinion of what is a decent zoo. With attendance soaring due to the opening of "Russia's Grizzly Coast" then perhaps the zoo can move up in the unofficial rankings of North America's best zoos. The new set of habitats (aside from the amur leopards) are quite amazing, and a candidate for the AZA Exhibit of the Year Award.
 
G'day Snow leopard. it's great to hear that your road trip has started. I am looking forward to your many reviews.
Could you maybe start a new thread and put all of your reviews and posts in it while you are on the road? that way we will know it's you reporting from somewhere new.
I hope you continue to have a good trip.
Drive safely.
 
Tropics Trail - ... The problem with this section of the zoo is that every single one of the habitats was far too small.

The sun bear indoor grotto is the smallest that I've ever seen for that bear, the red pandas had two trees extremely close to the public to climb on, the fishing cat was in a glass cage that was horribly small, the matschie's tree kangaroos were in an embarrassingly tiny cage, the chevrotains were in a matchbox-sized hole, the ringtailed and red ruffed lemurs were shoved together in a cramped exhibit. The white-cheeked gibbons were languishing in a pretty and yet small (and completely fake) island. Gorgeous animals but in exhibits that were toooo small.

This must be a common problem in all indoor exhibits of this nature, no? There are obvious size constraints to begin with, being entirely within a single building, and the zoo is generally trying to fit as many different species as possible into the area, some of which are fairly large and active animals (often things like tapirs, leopards, gibbons, etc). To your average visitor I doubt there is much appreciation for the minimal area for each animal because they are looking at all the vegetation and other surrounds, and thinking "wow this is awesome for the animals". There's a similar problem in nocturnal houses where zoos try to fit as many as species into the house as they can, resulting in very small cages, although in this case the limits are easier hidden by the darkness.
 
So "it has begun!" pretty exciting. Glad to hear you're on the road and having fun. And - of course - glad you enjoyed so much of Russia's Grizzly Coast. I understand your criticisms. I believe the Amur leopards were expected to benefit from all the vertical space.

Minnesota Trail - lots of adequate to very nice exhibits for North American animals, in which this zoo specializes in. At least 3 wolverines, 5 fishers (which we didn't see), wolves, coyotes, porcupines, a bald eagle, owls, river otters, beavers, lynx, cougar. All fairly well done.

The Minnesota Trail is interesting because it was a very small budget, in-house re-do of an older set of exhibits. Formerly, they were all glass fronted and the public area was simply concrete (I suppose to make you envy the animals outside in their "habitats.") The animal enclosures did not change much. This, and the newer tiger exhibit, are the work of the relatively new Director, so as long as he's there and the State funds it, the zoo will prosper.

Where's the next stop?
 
It appears that the zoo is doing much better with 1.1 million visitors in 2007/08 and its June 2008 attendance is the highest since the zoo first opened in 1978.
 
I'd love to see the Minnesota Zoo blossom into a fantastic institution, as their outdoor paddocks, tiger enclosures and of course "Russia's Grizzly Coast" are all fantastic. The indoor exhibits are definitely disappointing, but if the finances come through there are seemingly a myriad of plans for the future.
 
Minnesota Zoo reports highest attendance in nine years

This link talks about the record-setting attendance figures at the blossoming Minnesota Zoo, and it's intriguing to see that there are already big plans for next summer. A brand-new playground will be opened, plus a series of African animals (ostrich, zebra, antelope, etc) will be added to the zoo. Perhaps "Russia's Grizzly Coast" will kickstart some buzz about a pretty cool zoo.
 
Back
Top