I kind of understand the reasoning of wanting African Elephants in Wild Africa, why else name the 4 areas after the national parks most famous for elephants? Amboseli and Chobe especially.
Search up any 4 of these parks and one species will be depicted more than any other. It's like calling an exhibit Kakadu without a Croc or Virunga without a Gorilla. Imo Monarto should not consider African Elephants (if so at a minimum of 25 years down the track). As it would place too much pressure on an already busy and cash-strapped zoo.
In the meantime, some young Asian bulls (offspring of Pak Boon and Putra Mas) could potentially be dispersed throughout Wild Africa as a stand-in for Africans.
Good point. Irregardless of whether Monarto get African elephants, it’s certainly clear the Asian elephants are ambassadors for their African counterparts.
Prior to the announcement Monarto would be acquiring females (and hopefully establishing a matriarchal herd), I had wondered if they’d be a bachelor holding facility. Surplus bulls held on site may be less genetically valuable bulls from within the region as Putra Mas’ son/sons with Pak Boon (unless they have three sons or something) would be in higher demand for breeding themselves - within the region or overseas.









